Ontario Convention Center - Ontario, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | YI William W. | - | - | 4% | 16% | 33% | 34% | 13% |
| 2 | WYMAN Julian | - | - | - | 1% | 6% | 32% | 61% |
| 3 | WOO Christian | - | - | - | - | 2% | 22% | 76% |
| 3 | LU Royce | - | - | - | 3% | 28% | 52% | 18% |
| 5 | CANLAS Nathan | - | - | - | 1% | 9% | 38% | 53% |
| 6 | LE Jacob H. | - | - | 1% | 13% | 50% | 32% | 4% |
| 7 | DINSAY Kristjan | - | - | 2% | 11% | 32% | 39% | 15% |
| 8 | CHEN Matthew | - | - | 1% | 5% | 24% | 45% | 25% |
| 9 | DERRICK Blake | - | - | 1% | 5% | 22% | 43% | 29% |
| 10 | LIN Youlong | - | - | - | 5% | 31% | 64% | |
| 11 | KIM Daniel Y. | - | - | - | 4% | 27% | 47% | 21% |
| 12 | LI Matthew | - | 1% | 8% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 6% |
| 13 | NGUYEN Martin | - | - | - | 2% | 16% | 45% | 37% |
| 14 | BIELER Mason | - | 3% | 14% | 32% | 35% | 15% | 1% |
| 15 | CHOI Ethan | - | - | - | 5% | 22% | 45% | 28% |
| 16 | CO Dylan | - | - | - | - | 7% | 38% | 55% |
| 17 | SISINNI Leonardo | - | 5% | 22% | 38% | 27% | 8% | 1% |
| 18 | LIN Xilong | - | - | - | 3% | 17% | 43% | 37% |
| 19 | FUKUDA Diego | - | 1% | 8% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 5% |
| 20 | PARK Rion | - | - | 2% | 16% | 42% | 33% | 6% |
| 21 | ROZALSKI Eli | - | - | 2% | 12% | 35% | 40% | 11% |
| 22 | HUANG Jonathan | - | - | 1% | 11% | 33% | 41% | 14% |
| 23 | NICOLETTI Luca | - | - | - | 4% | 19% | 41% | 35% |
| 24 | ZHOU Ryan | - | 1% | 11% | 32% | 38% | 17% | 2% |
| 25 | LI Richard | - | 3% | 14% | 33% | 35% | 13% | 2% |
| 25 | WANDJI Noah | - | - | 2% | 16% | 43% | 32% | 7% |
| 27 | WONG Evan | - | 2% | 11% | 29% | 36% | 19% | 3% |
| 28 | BI Ryan | - | 1% | 11% | 32% | 38% | 17% | 2% |
| 29 | CHONG Tristan | - | 2% | 13% | 31% | 36% | 16% | 1% |
| 30 | LIU William | - | 5% | 28% | 42% | 22% | 2% | |
| 31 | PARK Steve (Sangmin) | - | 1% | 8% | 29% | 39% | 20% | 2% |
| 32 | PARK Sky | - | - | 2% | 14% | 40% | 37% | 8% |
| 33 | LOZANO Veyron Jericho | - | 2% | 10% | 28% | 36% | 20% | 3% |
| 34 | ZHANG Aaron | - | - | 1% | 11% | 33% | 39% | 16% |
| 35 | BAE Eugene | - | 5% | 28% | 43% | 22% | 2% | |
| 36 | MARTIN IV Elmer D. | - | - | 1% | 8% | 29% | 42% | 20% |
| 37 | FINNEY Lorenz | - | 4% | 15% | 32% | 32% | 15% | 2% |
| 38 | RODRIGUEZ Tyler | 1% | 8% | 25% | 35% | 23% | 6% | 1% |
| 39 | YUE Jackson | - | 4% | 22% | 40% | 27% | 7% | 1% |
| 40 | NAVARRO Kato | - | 1% | 11% | 32% | 37% | 17% | 2% |
| 41 | WU Alber Y. | - | - | - | 2% | 12% | 39% | 48% |
| 42 | ZHAN Kevin | 5% | 25% | 38% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 43 | BORG Matthew | 1% | 10% | 29% | 36% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 44 | KIM Aiden | - | 3% | 16% | 34% | 33% | 12% | 2% |
| 45 | PINCHENG Yao | - | 3% | 18% | 34% | 30% | 13% | 2% |
| 46 | CHANG Jonathan | - | 1% | 9% | 35% | 37% | 16% | 2% |
| 47 | ZHANG Jayden | 3% | 20% | 41% | 31% | 5% | - | - |
| 48 | GUDIMETLA Siddhanth | 44% | 40% | 13% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 49 | WONG Braxton | 2% | 19% | 48% | 25% | 5% | - | - |
| 50 | UPENDER West | 13% | 34% | 34% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
| 51 | WEI Winston | 5% | 25% | 40% | 25% | 5% | - | - |
| 52 | CHANG Eric Jonathan | 2% | 14% | 32% | 33% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 53 | TSOI Spencer | 1% | 10% | 35% | 36% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 54 | HERNANDEZ BERRON Salvador | - | 6% | 35% | 41% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 55 | COSTE Fabien | - | - | 2% | 15% | 40% | 34% | 9% |
| 56 | QIU Zhaocheng | - | 4% | 25% | 43% | 25% | 3% | |
| 57 | CHALUT Etienne | - | - | < 1% | 3% | 16% | 41% | 40% |
| 58 | ZHANG Jacob | - | 4% | 16% | 33% | 31% | 13% | 2% |
| 59 | YUAN Zhihe | 4% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 60 | SEIGEL Duncan | 15% | 37% | 33% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 61 | OROPEZA David | - | 2% | 12% | 29% | 34% | 19% | 4% |
| 62 | KUNTSEVICH Ivan I. | 4% | 23% | 39% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 63 | PETROV Mikhail | 6% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 64 | GREENEBAUM Oliver | 4% | 25% | 39% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 65 | ORNELAS Matteo | 2% | 29% | 39% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 66 | LI Jett | - | 3% | 14% | 33% | 34% | 14% | 2% |
| 67 | TSAY Jordan R. | - | 4% | 30% | 44% | 19% | 3% | - |
| 68 | MIRON Ioachim | 6% | 29% | 42% | 21% | 2% | - | - |
| 69 | LING Carson Jr | 7% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 70 | MORROW Brenden | - | 3% | 16% | 33% | 31% | 14% | 2% |
| 71 | PE Noah | 2% | 12% | 31% | 34% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 72 | CAJERO Luis O. | - | 6% | 28% | 39% | 21% | 5% | - |
| 72 | LEE Christopher | 24% | 42% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 74 | CHANG Nathan | 12% | 34% | 34% | 16% | 4% | - | - |
| 75 | CHIANG Aiden | 31% | 51% | 16% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 76 | CHEN Fengyi(James) | 6% | 49% | 36% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 77 | TRUJILLO Jonah | 42% | 47% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 78 | PETRAITIS Matteus | 6% | 26% | 37% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 79 | ZHANG Raphael | 8% | 31% | 39% | 19% | 3% | - | - |
| 80 | PONTOPPIDAN Erik | 15% | 40% | 34% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 81 | ZHANG Andrew | 17% | 39% | 32% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 82 | MARSHALL Kyler | 60% | 34% | 5% | - | - | - | - |
| 83 | SMITH Jeremiah | 34% | 42% | 19% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 84 | KARPMAN Benny | 29% | 50% | 18% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 84 | ATTIA Aly | 5% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 86 | BURAGOHAIN Aiden | 20% | 60% | 19% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 87 | SCHIENEMAN Valentine | 1% | 7% | 24% | 37% | 24% | 7% | 1% |
| 88 | BAKER Ethan | 14% | 35% | 33% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
| 89 | FOY Grant | 8% | 31% | 39% | 19% | 3% | - | - |
| 89 | BLUNCK Kristof | 13% | 35% | 33% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
| 91 | YUAN Jonathan | 84% | 15% | 1% | - | - | - | |
| 92 | CHARETTE Matt | 14% | 49% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 92 | PEAKE Santiago | 68% | 30% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
| 94 | WILLIAMS Matthew | 44% | 45% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 94 | DACKO Nolan | 30% | 44% | 22% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 96 | SHORTER David Alexander | 85% | 14% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
| 97 | WASHBURN Cooper | 45% | 40% | 13% | 2% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.