Secaucus, NJ - Secaucus, NJ, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | SHIPITSIN Alexander | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 48% | 14% | 1% |
| 2 | SHINCHUK Daniel | 100% | 100% | 95% | 78% | 44% | 13% | 1% |
| 3 | ANTHONY Devyn V. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 49% | 14% | |
| 3 | GONZALEZ Emilio A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 26% |
| 5 | KONG Alan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 41% | 10% |
| 6 | MEHAN Nicholas | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 75% | 42% | 11% |
| 7 | DUCKETT Myles | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 47% | 13% | |
| 8 | GONG Zihao | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 47% | 16% | 2% |
| 9 | SU Landon | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 43% | 13% | 1% |
| 10 | HUANG Alex F. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 68% | 29% | 5% |
| 11 | KUSHKOV Daniel | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 32% | 6% |
| 12 | HUNG Samuel | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 56% | 15% |
| 13 | MEDVINSKY Daniel | 100% | 100% | 93% | 65% | 23% | 3% | |
| 14 | ALAVE Kyle | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 51% | 15% |
| 14 | ZHAO Lucas | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 76% | 42% | 11% |
| 16 | CLARK Gabriel | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 54% | 15% | |
| 17 | BONETTI Brayden | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 63% | 24% | 3% |
| 18 | KOGAN Yelisey L. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 59% | 17% |
| 19 | SHU Tony | 100% | 100% | 100% | 92% | 58% | 15% | |
| 20 | LIN Philip T. | 100% | 98% | 79% | 43% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 22 | WAXLER Ryan | 100% | 90% | 56% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
| 23 | IDRISSI Idris | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 37% | 11% | 1% |
| 24 | GONG Ziqian | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 29% | 5% |
| 25 | DA GRACA Tyler | 100% | 97% | 81% | 50% | 18% | 3% | |
| 26 | TSAO Oliver | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 52% | 18% | 3% |
| 27 | CARRINGTON IV William T. | 100% | 96% | 72% | 26% | 4% | - | - |
| 28 | AHISHALI Devin | 100% | 100% | 98% | 90% | 64% | 29% | 5% |
| 29 | WITCZAK Mateus | 100% | 99% | 88% | 58% | 23% | 5% | - |
| 30 | WONG Caleb W. | 100% | 97% | 82% | 52% | 21% | 5% | - |
| 31 | CHANG Yuyang | 100% | 85% | 48% | 14% | 2% | - | |
| 32 | PATEL Rayn | 100% | 84% | 44% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 33 | GRIGORESCU Alexander | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 36% |
| 34 | NARDINI Nathanael P. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 44% | 13% | 1% |
| 35 | SUGIURA Samuel | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 45% | 15% | 2% |
| 36 | MEYERSON Jacob | 100% | 96% | 78% | 46% | 17% | 4% | - |
| 37 | VOLVOVSKIY Tim | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 44% | 13% | 1% |
| 38 | LEE Andrew | 100% | 82% | 44% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
| 39 | CLARK Caleb | 100% | 100% | 93% | 69% | 34% | 9% | 1% |
| 40 | WANG Max | 100% | 97% | 82% | 48% | 15% | 1% | |
| 41 | YAN William | 100% | 94% | 62% | 22% | 3% | - | |
| 42 | CHEN Jonathan | 100% | 100% | 94% | 74% | 39% | 11% | 1% |
| 44 | LIGH Checed | 100% | 68% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 45 | JUNG Ethan | 100% | 96% | 77% | 42% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 46 | LI Aidan | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 43% | 13% | 2% |
| 47 | KUSHNIR Zack | 100% | 85% | 47% | 14% | 2% | - | |
| 48 | KENNEDY Dakoda | 100% | 92% | 63% | 27% | 6% | - | |
| 49 | CUKIERMAN Benjamin | 100% | 96% | 71% | 32% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 50 | SHINCHUK Jacob | 100% | 54% | 15% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 51 | OH Aster | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 54% | 19% | 2% |
| 52 | GIMBRERE Alexandre | 100% | 98% | 87% | 58% | 25% | 5% | - |
| 54 | EYBELMAN Ariel | 100% | 94% | 70% | 35% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 55 | DIGIACOMO Dennis G. | 100% | 77% | 37% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 56 | SAKMANN Sebastian | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 59% | 23% | 4% |
| 57 | MORSE Sebastian | 100% | 93% | 68% | 32% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 58 | GUREVICH Benjamin | 100% | 64% | 19% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 59 | RUSSELL Hudson | 100% | 88% | 51% | 15% | 1% | - | |
| 60 | SULLIVAN Ciaran P. | 100% | 98% | 84% | 48% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 61 | SARBU Eric | 100% | 69% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.