Middlebury Union Middle School - South Burlington, VT, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | BOLDUC Patrice | - | - | 2% | 13% | 40% | 45% | |
2 | BUSH Thomas | - | - | - | 3% | 17% | 42% | 38% |
3 | ROUSE Joseph (Joe) T. | - | 4% | 17% | 35% | 33% | 12% | |
3 | LUSSIER Jesse B. | - | - | 6% | 26% | 43% | 24% | |
5 | NGUYEN Thanh H. | - | 5% | 22% | 38% | 28% | 6% | |
6 | MEAGHER Roderick | 2% | 13% | 32% | 35% | 16% | 2% | |
7 | KROHN Matthew | 11% | 33% | 36% | 17% | 4% | - | |
8 | RUGGLES William R. | - | 5% | 22% | 38% | 28% | 7% | |
9 | D'SOUZA Carlisle (Charlie) J. | - | 1% | 7% | 27% | 42% | 23% | |
10 | MEHRBACH Jesse | 1% | 19% | 40% | 30% | 9% | 1% | - |
11 | LAMOREAUX Zachariah P. | 1% | 8% | 28% | 40% | 21% | 3% | |
12 | LELAND James (Jim) E. | - | 3% | 16% | 34% | 32% | 13% | 2% |
13 | WALTING Paul J. | - | 7% | 29% | 39% | 21% | 4% | |
14 | WHEELER Michele L. | 46% | 40% | 12% | 2% | - | - | |
15 | LUNIEVICZ Joseph P. | 4% | 18% | 34% | 29% | 13% | 2% | - |
16 | FOX Viveka R. | 7% | 29% | 39% | 21% | 5% | - | |
17 | LAROCHELLE Bastien | - | - | 5% | 19% | 37% | 32% | 8% |
18 | GLAZER Adam | 4% | 18% | 33% | 30% | 13% | 2% | - |
19 | CLERMONT Adrian | - | 4% | 22% | 42% | 27% | 5% | |
20 | FERLAND Brent | 6% | 25% | 38% | 24% | 6% | 1% | |
21 | ZIMMERMAN Robert | 14% | 35% | 33% | 15% | 3% | - | |
22 | KASTANAS Stamatia Tina | 3% | 19% | 38% | 31% | 9% | - | |
23 | LAMOREAUX Julie A. | 15% | 52% | 27% | 5% | - | - | |
24 | HANNA Richard | 34% | 43% | 19% | 4% | - | - | |
25 | PEDEN Emily | 22% | 42% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.