Secaucus, NJ - Secaucus, NJ, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | HOOSHI Erica S. | - | - | 2% | 17% | 44% | 36% | |
| 2 | SERBAN Samantha M. | - | - | 2% | 13% | 46% | 40% | |
| 3 | ALFONSO Czarina M. | - | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 42% | 29% |
| 3 | TUCKER ALARCON Ariadna C. | - | - | 4% | 21% | 48% | 27% | |
| 5 | JING Alexandra | - | - | - | 2% | 12% | 39% | 47% |
| 6 | SHEN Sophia H. | 1% | 10% | 26% | 35% | 22% | 6% | |
| 7 | RASO Sofia G. | - | - | - | 5% | 29% | 52% | 14% |
| 8 | KIM Rachael | - | - | 4% | 18% | 35% | 32% | 11% |
| 9 | FANG Sabrina | - | - | - | 1% | 12% | 41% | 46% |
| 10 | ABAYEVA Sasha | - | - | - | 2% | 17% | 47% | 34% |
| 11 | LIN Ashley | - | - | 5% | 20% | 37% | 30% | 8% |
| 12 | WANG Ellen | - | - | - | 4% | 22% | 47% | 27% |
| 13 | KOENIG Charlotte R. | - | 3% | 18% | 42% | 31% | 7% | |
| 14 | JING Emily | - | - | 2% | 12% | 32% | 37% | 16% |
| 15 | DAVIA Daniella V. | - | 1% | 9% | 26% | 37% | 22% | 4% |
| 16 | ZHENG Ivy | - | - | 5% | 23% | 43% | 29% | |
| 17 | YE Eileen | - | - | - | 4% | 19% | 42% | 35% |
| 18 | SADAN Jordan E. | - | 3% | 16% | 36% | 34% | 11% | |
| 19 | PO Edith | - | 3% | 18% | 37% | 30% | 10% | 1% |
| 20 | HE Fenghuan | - | 1% | 11% | 29% | 35% | 20% | 4% |
| 21 | OUYANG Bridgette Z. | - | - | - | 1% | 10% | 38% | 51% |
| 22 | XU Christine | - | 5% | 23% | 40% | 26% | 5% | |
| 23 | STUTCHBURY Carolina J. | - | 1% | 10% | 32% | 39% | 16% | 2% |
| 24 | ADAMS KIM Natalie | - | 5% | 22% | 41% | 26% | 6% | - |
| 25 | PATEL Anika | 1% | 8% | 27% | 37% | 21% | 5% | - |
| 26 | CHEN Jessie S. | - | - | 3% | 17% | 37% | 34% | 9% |
| 27 | SHAW Kayla M. | 1% | 9% | 27% | 35% | 22% | 6% | 1% |
| 28 | CHEN Jia P. | - | 1% | 9% | 32% | 42% | 16% | |
| 29 | CHEN Kelly | - | 1% | 10% | 32% | 39% | 15% | 2% |
| 30 | KIM Lauren Hyomin | 1% | 7% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 7% | |
| 31 | WU Irene M. | 3% | 20% | 37% | 28% | 10% | 1% | |
| 32 | YU Jaime L. | 14% | 38% | 34% | 12% | 1% | - | |
| 33 | LI Meilin | - | 5% | 20% | 36% | 30% | 9% | |
| 34 | HOLLE Aviella S. | - | 1% | 10% | 31% | 38% | 18% | 2% |
| 35 | LUNG Katerina | - | - | 3% | 17% | 38% | 33% | 8% |
| 36 | WERBACH Esther | 2% | 15% | 36% | 33% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 37 | HECKMANN Emma | 1% | 8% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 7% | 1% |
| 38 | MEYER Claudia | 2% | 14% | 30% | 32% | 17% | 4% | - |
| 39 | CHENG Gloria | 30% | 43% | 22% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 40 | XUE Alanna | 2% | 12% | 30% | 34% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 41 | SRIVASTAVA Palak | 20% | 56% | 21% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 42 | LAM Victoria M. | 4% | 20% | 35% | 29% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 43 | COSTELLO Angeline S. | 1% | 11% | 34% | 36% | 15% | 2% | |
| 44 | CHEN Allison V. | 1% | 10% | 29% | 36% | 20% | 4% | |
| 45 | CHO Lorin Y. | 4% | 21% | 39% | 29% | 7% | 1% | |
| 46 | XU Madison | 5% | 34% | 42% | 17% | 3% | - | |
| 47 | LIU Sophia | 3% | 15% | 33% | 32% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 48 | WILSON Anna S. | - | - | 4% | 20% | 38% | 30% | 7% |
| 49 | SHEN Annabel | - | 1% | 9% | 27% | 37% | 22% | 4% |
| 50 | RASO Olivia | 1% | 6% | 25% | 40% | 23% | 5% | - |
| 51 | MAESTRADO Ashley R. | 8% | 31% | 39% | 19% | 3% | - | - |
| 52 | SENIC Adeline | - | 3% | 17% | 34% | 31% | 13% | 2% |
| 53 | SHEN Sophia | 12% | 35% | 36% | 15% | 2% | - | |
| 54 | SHEN Lydia | 4% | 29% | 44% | 19% | 3% | - | |
| 55 | HUANG Natalie | 13% | 36% | 36% | 14% | 2% | - | |
| 56 | CHEN Georgia M. | 22% | 44% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 57 | MUELLER Tatum J. | 68% | 28% | 4% | - | - | - | |
| 58 | LEE Alison | 5% | 27% | 43% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
| 59 | WU Julianna Y. | 1% | 9% | 31% | 37% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 60 | MCSHINE Katelyn H. | 4% | 25% | 39% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 61 | ACHILOVA Feyza | 9% | 36% | 38% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
| 62 | YU Lauren C. | 36% | 43% | 18% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 63 | SULTANA-HOLE Olivia B. | 11% | 40% | 36% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 64 | KOROTCOVA Anastasia | 35% | 48% | 15% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 65 | ZHEN Ellen | 18% | 40% | 30% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
| 66 | NORTH Zoe M. | 33% | 42% | 20% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 67 | FUCHS Ava R. | 32% | 43% | 20% | 4% | - | - | |
| 68 | SARKARIA Jasminder | 13% | 35% | 35% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
| 69 | LIN Emma | 35% | 46% | 17% | 2% | - | - | |
| 70 | KNOEPFFLER Andrea V. | 19% | 41% | 30% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 71 | MUSTO Isabella | 41% | 41% | 15% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 73 | NICOLL Kathryn | 15% | 51% | 28% | 5% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.