Rockland Community College, Eugene Levy Field House - Suffern, NY, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | WANG Amabel | - | - | - | - | 1% | 15% | 85% |
| 2 | YAO Abby | - | - | - | - | 5% | 29% | 65% |
| 3 | YIN Chloe | - | - | - | 2% | 14% | 40% | 43% |
| 3 | YACOBUCCI Nadia | - | - | - | - | 3% | 26% | 71% |
| 5 | ZHAO Olivia | - | - | - | 1% | 10% | 41% | 49% |
| 6 | ORBÉ-AUSTIN Maya | - | - | - | 1% | 8% | 34% | 56% |
| 7 | JOO Sara | - | - | - | 1% | 9% | 46% | 45% |
| 8 | DE CASTRO Kai | - | 1% | 7% | 27% | 42% | 23% | |
| 9 | DONG Iris | - | - | - | 2% | 14% | 42% | 42% |
| 10 | MURPHY Genevieve | - | - | 1% | 11% | 34% | 41% | 12% |
| 11 | SHIN Elizabeth | - | - | - | 1% | 11% | 40% | 48% |
| 12 | BO Iris | - | 1% | 9% | 30% | 38% | 19% | 3% |
| 13 | LUO lucy | - | 1% | 10% | 34% | 38% | 15% | 2% |
| 14 | YANG Hanli | - | - | 2% | 13% | 35% | 38% | 12% |
| 15 | LIN Claire | - | 7% | 29% | 39% | 21% | 4% | |
| 16 | RIVERA Leahy | - | 2% | 11% | 30% | 39% | 19% | |
| 17 | XING Melly | - | - | - | 2% | 15% | 51% | 32% |
| 18 | CHO Olivia | - | - | 1% | 7% | 27% | 47% | 18% |
| 19 | ZHU Alivia | - | - | 3% | 17% | 40% | 35% | 5% |
| 20 | SINGH Evangelina | - | - | 4% | 22% | 45% | 29% | |
| 21 | ZHENG Annalyn | - | 1% | 11% | 36% | 39% | 13% | |
| 22 | ZHU Ella | - | 5% | 20% | 37% | 29% | 8% | |
| 23 | CHAN Jolene | - | 1% | 10% | 29% | 35% | 20% | 4% |
| 24 | SHEN Gloria | - | - | 3% | 16% | 41% | 37% | 3% |
| 25 | LIU Sophia | - | 2% | 14% | 33% | 34% | 14% | 2% |
| 26 | SON Ayoung | - | - | 1% | 7% | 28% | 42% | 21% |
| 27 | KHETPAL Aalia | - | 3% | 15% | 32% | 33% | 15% | 2% |
| 28 | ENRIQUEZ Bianca Perla | - | - | 4% | 19% | 37% | 32% | 8% |
| 29 | ZHANG Caroline | 1% | 7% | 22% | 34% | 26% | 9% | 1% |
| 30 | GE Deanna | 1% | 8% | 26% | 37% | 23% | 5% | |
| 31 | BYK Karalina | - | - | 5% | 21% | 43% | 31% | |
| 32 | LLOYD Bianca | 1% | 9% | 29% | 37% | 20% | 4% | |
| 33 | LEO Jenna | - | 4% | 21% | 39% | 29% | 7% | |
| 34 | YANG Olivia | - | 3% | 16% | 36% | 34% | 11% | |
| 35 | KIM Yuna | - | 2% | 12% | 31% | 36% | 16% | 2% |
| 36 | ZHU Audrey | - | 2% | 12% | 33% | 36% | 15% | 2% |
| 37 | KASHUBA Mila | - | 3% | 17% | 39% | 33% | 7% | - |
| 38 | KIRBY Emelie | 3% | 16% | 32% | 31% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 39 | ELLISON Ingrid | - | 2% | 15% | 38% | 34% | 10% | 1% |
| 40 | HAFEZ Sahar | - | 1% | 8% | 28% | 42% | 19% | 1% |
| 40 | SHI Micah | 1% | 10% | 28% | 35% | 21% | 5% | - |
| 42 | LI Christina | - | 1% | 10% | 35% | 40% | 14% | |
| 43 | WANG Joann | - | 7% | 29% | 39% | 21% | 4% | |
| 44 | PAEK Mila | 1% | 11% | 35% | 36% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 45 | GENG Emma | 1% | 11% | 30% | 34% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 46 | HUANG Emma | 1% | 6% | 20% | 34% | 29% | 11% | 1% |
| 47 | SUN Nicole | - | 1% | 10% | 33% | 39% | 16% | 1% |
| 48 | VO Evelyn | 1% | 8% | 26% | 35% | 23% | 6% | - |
| 49 | MILLER Anna | 2% | 17% | 35% | 32% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 50 | FAN Melody | 7% | 25% | 35% | 23% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 50 | LIU Bella | 1% | 12% | 35% | 36% | 14% | 1% | - |
| 52 | CLOUD Chrystie | 4% | 21% | 38% | 28% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 53 | HOLLIS Priscillia | 8% | 33% | 37% | 18% | 4% | - | |
| 54 | LI Doreen | 21% | 41% | 29% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 55 | DOMINIK Eliana | 7% | 40% | 39% | 12% | 1% | - | |
| 56 | ZHILKOV Anya | - | 4% | 19% | 37% | 30% | 9% | |
| 57 | DONG Katelyn | 5% | 30% | 39% | 21% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 58 | FAROOQI Eliora | 5% | 21% | 37% | 28% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 59 | LEE Annabel | 14% | 40% | 35% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
| 60 | HOU Xu | 12% | 35% | 35% | 15% | 3% | - | |
| 61 | JU Victoria | 9% | 31% | 37% | 19% | 4% | - | |
| 62 | WEN Lillian | 2% | 15% | 33% | 33% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 63 | HUANG Jiayu | 1% | 10% | 31% | 36% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 64 | DONG Audrey | 2% | 14% | 37% | 35% | 12% | 1% | - |
| 65 | WU Charlotte | - | 5% | 20% | 36% | 30% | 8% | 1% |
| 66 | MCCLAIN Madison | 1% | 8% | 27% | 37% | 22% | 6% | - |
| 67 | FENG Christy | 19% | 39% | 30% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
| 68 | PAEK Ellie | 3% | 27% | 45% | 21% | 4% | - | |
| 69 | LU Sophia | 9% | 36% | 37% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
| 70 | HUDSON Sophie | 10% | 32% | 37% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
| 71 | WANG Heidi | 20% | 48% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 72 | BALIN Sophia | 1% | 27% | 42% | 24% | 6% | - | |
| 73 | KIM Lael | 3% | 18% | 36% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 74 | ZELDIN Nina | 7% | 35% | 40% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
| 75 | MCCLELLAN Florence | 5% | 24% | 38% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 75 | YAN Elena | 6% | 32% | 41% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
| 77 | LE Minnie | - | 4% | 22% | 40% | 27% | 6% | - |
| 78 | MCCLAIN Grayce | 3% | 20% | 37% | 28% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 79 | ZHU Alicia | 22% | 41% | 28% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 80 | YEH Constance | - | 6% | 23% | 35% | 26% | 9% | 1% |
| 81 | ZHU Joanna | 15% | 35% | 32% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
| 82 | SAVIR Abigail | 41% | 43% | 14% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 83 | JIN Emily | 52% | 38% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 84 | LUXIEO Cathy | 59% | 33% | 7% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 85 | GOMEZ Amelia | 11% | 34% | 35% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 86 | WEST Mira | 44% | 40% | 14% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 87 | LABANOK Amelia | 68% | 28% | 4% | - | - | - | |
| 88 | ZUCKER Eleanor | 58% | 33% | 8% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 88 | ZAMLYNNY Victoria | 1% | 7% | 22% | 34% | 26% | 9% | 1% |
| 90 | LIANG Jasmine | 42% | 41% | 14% | 2% | - | - | |
| 91 | CHIN Harper | 45% | 42% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 92 | MIN Claire | 94% | 6% | - | - | - | - | |
| 93 | WANG Rebecca | 50% | 39% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 94 | NIVAS Tvisha | 1% | 7% | 26% | 40% | 23% | 4% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.