Rockland Community College, Eugene Levy Field House - Suffern, NY, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | WANG Amabel | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 85% |
2 | YAO Abby | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 65% |
3 | YIN Chloe | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 43% |
3 | YACOBUCCI Nadia | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 71% |
5 | ZHAO Olivia | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 49% |
6 | ORBÉ-AUSTIN Maya | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 56% |
7 | JOO Sara | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 45% |
8 | DE CASTRO Kai | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 65% | 23% | |
9 | DONG Iris | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 42% |
10 | MURPHY Genevieve | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 54% | 12% |
11 | SHIN Elizabeth | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 48% |
12 | BO Iris | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 60% | 22% | 3% |
13 | LUO lucy | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 55% | 17% | 2% |
14 | YANG Hanli | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 50% | 12% |
15 | LIN Claire | 100% | 100% | 93% | 64% | 25% | 4% | |
16 | RIVERA Leahy | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 57% | 19% | |
17 | XING Melly | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 32% |
18 | CHO Olivia | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 65% | 18% |
19 | ZHU Alivia | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 40% | 5% |
20 | SINGH Evangelina | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 74% | 29% | |
21 | ZHENG Annalyn | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 52% | 13% | |
22 | ZHU Ella | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 38% | 8% | |
23 | CHAN Jolene | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 60% | 25% | 4% |
24 | SHEN Gloria | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 40% | 3% |
25 | LIU Sophia | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 50% | 16% | 2% |
26 | SON Ayoung | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 63% | 21% |
27 | KHETPAL Aalia | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 50% | 17% | 2% |
28 | ENRIQUEZ Bianca Perla | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 40% | 8% |
29 | ZHANG Caroline | 100% | 99% | 92% | 70% | 36% | 9% | 1% |
30 | GE Deanna | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 29% | 5% | |
31 | BYK Karalina | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 31% | |
32 | LLOYD Bianca | 100% | 99% | 90% | 61% | 25% | 4% | |
33 | LEO Jenna | 100% | 100% | 96% | 75% | 36% | 7% | |
34 | YANG Olivia | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 44% | 11% | |
35 | KIM Yuna | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 55% | 19% | 2% |
36 | ZHU Audrey | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 53% | 16% | 2% |
37 | KASHUBA Mila | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 40% | 7% | - |
38 | KIRBY Emelie | 100% | 97% | 80% | 48% | 17% | 3% | - |
39 | ELLISON Ingrid | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 45% | 11% | 1% |
40 | HAFEZ Sahar | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 62% | 20% | 1% |
40 | SHI Micah | 100% | 99% | 89% | 61% | 26% | 6% | - |
42 | LI Christina | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 54% | 14% | |
43 | WANG Joann | 100% | 100% | 93% | 64% | 25% | 4% | |
44 | PAEK Mila | 100% | 99% | 88% | 53% | 17% | 2% | - |
45 | GENG Emma | 100% | 99% | 88% | 58% | 24% | 5% | - |
46 | HUANG Emma | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 40% | 11% | 1% |
47 | SUN Nicole | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 56% | 17% | 1% |
48 | VO Evelyn | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 29% | 7% | - |
49 | MILLER Anna | 100% | 98% | 81% | 46% | 14% | 2% | - |
50 | FAN Melody | 100% | 93% | 68% | 32% | 9% | 1% | - |
50 | LIU Bella | 100% | 99% | 87% | 52% | 15% | 1% | - |
52 | CLOUD Chrystie | 100% | 96% | 75% | 37% | 9% | 1% | - |
53 | HOLLIS Priscillia | 100% | 92% | 58% | 22% | 4% | - | |
54 | LI Doreen | 100% | 79% | 38% | 10% | 1% | - | |
55 | DOMINIK Eliana | 100% | 93% | 52% | 13% | 1% | - | |
56 | ZHILKOV Anya | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 39% | 9% | |
57 | DONG Katelyn | 100% | 95% | 65% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - |
58 | FAROOQI Eliora | 100% | 95% | 74% | 37% | 10% | 1% | - |
59 | LEE Annabel | 100% | 86% | 47% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
60 | HOU Xu | 100% | 88% | 53% | 18% | 3% | - | |
61 | JU Victoria | 100% | 91% | 60% | 23% | 4% | - | |
62 | WEN Lillian | 100% | 98% | 83% | 49% | 16% | 2% | - |
63 | HUANG Jiayu | 100% | 99% | 89% | 59% | 23% | 4% | - |
64 | DONG Audrey | 100% | 98% | 84% | 47% | 13% | 1% | - |
65 | WU Charlotte | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 39% | 9% | 1% |
66 | MCCLAIN Madison | 100% | 99% | 92% | 65% | 29% | 6% | - |
67 | FENG Christy | 100% | 81% | 42% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
68 | PAEK Ellie | 100% | 97% | 70% | 25% | 4% | - | |
69 | LU Sophia | 100% | 91% | 55% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
70 | HUDSON Sophie | 100% | 90% | 58% | 21% | 3% | - | - |
71 | WANG Heidi | 100% | 80% | 33% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
72 | BALIN Sophia | 100% | 99% | 72% | 31% | 6% | - | |
73 | KIM Lael | 100% | 97% | 79% | 43% | 13% | 2% | - |
74 | ZELDIN Nina | 100% | 93% | 58% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
75 | MCCLELLAN Florence | 100% | 95% | 70% | 32% | 7% | 1% | - |
75 | YAN Elena | 100% | 94% | 63% | 21% | 3% | - | - |
77 | LE Minnie | 100% | 100% | 96% | 73% | 33% | 7% | - |
78 | MCCLAIN Grayce | 100% | 97% | 76% | 39% | 11% | 1% | - |
79 | ZHU Alicia | 100% | 78% | 37% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
80 | YEH Constance | 100% | 100% | 93% | 71% | 35% | 9% | 1% |
81 | ZHU Joanna | 100% | 85% | 50% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
82 | SAVIR Abigail | 100% | 59% | 16% | 2% | - | - | - |
83 | JIN Emily | 100% | 48% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
84 | LUXIEO Cathy | 100% | 41% | 7% | 1% | - | - | - |
85 | GOMEZ Amelia | 100% | 89% | 55% | 20% | 3% | - | - |
86 | WEST Mira | 100% | 56% | 16% | 2% | - | - | - |
87 | LABANOK Amelia | 100% | 32% | 4% | - | - | - | |
88 | ZUCKER Eleanor | 100% | 42% | 8% | 1% | - | - | - |
88 | ZAMLYNNY Victoria | 100% | 99% | 92% | 70% | 36% | 10% | 1% |
90 | LIANG Jasmine | 100% | 58% | 17% | 3% | - | - | |
91 | CHIN Harper | 100% | 55% | 13% | 1% | - | - | - |
92 | MIN Claire | 100% | 6% | - | - | - | - | |
93 | WANG Rebecca | 100% | 50% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
94 | NIVAS Tvisha | 100% | 99% | 93% | 67% | 27% | 4% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.