Rain City Fencing Center - Bellevue, WA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | LU Jacob | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 61% |
2 | DU Evan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 81% | 37% | |
3 | SHI Jian-An | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 59% | 23% | 4% |
3 | VOO Lucas | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 38% | 8% |
5 | LEWIS Michael | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 79% | 47% | 14% |
6 | FU Nolan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 54% | 18% |
7 | ZHANG Austin | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 54% | 18% | 2% |
8 | ST CLAIR Soren | 100% | 99% | 94% | 77% | 46% | 16% | 3% |
9 | LEE Daniel | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 47% | 16% | 2% |
10 | ZHANG Kwan Fei(Albert) | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 26% |
11 | LEUNG Dylan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 35% | 8% |
12 | MA Nolan | 100% | 100% | 96% | 73% | 30% | 5% | |
13 | MOU Jaydon | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 62% | 27% | 5% |
14 | WANG Jason | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 47% | 13% |
15 | VAN JAARSVELD Leo | 100% | 100% | 96% | 82% | 54% | 22% | 4% |
16 | XUE Michael | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 50% | 15% |
17 | WANG Aaron | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 77% | 41% | 9% |
18 | GOWDA Suyog | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 27% |
19 | LIN Bryan | 100% | 99% | 88% | 60% | 26% | 6% | 1% |
20 | DENG Destin | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 29% | 7% | 1% |
21 | ZHANG Jonathan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 34% | 7% |
22 | WONG Aaron | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 54% | 20% | 3% |
23 | TANG Michael | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 30% | 4% |
24 | ZHANG Chaoyi(Joey) | 100% | 98% | 88% | 62% | 30% | 8% | 1% |
25 | QIN Owen | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 57% | 24% | 5% |
26 | ENG Kyler | 100% | 99% | 93% | 73% | 41% | 14% | 2% |
27 | LIU Xuyao | 100% | 93% | 70% | 36% | 11% | 2% | - |
28 | KIM Doyun | 100% | 98% | 86% | 55% | 21% | 4% | - |
29 | COSTANTINI DANG Anthony | 100% | 99% | 89% | 65% | 32% | 9% | 1% |
30 | LIU Yihong | 100% | 94% | 72% | 39% | 13% | 2% | - |
31 | WU MiEr | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 57% | 24% | 5% |
32 | LU Ian | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 35% | 10% | 1% |
33 | YAKOVYSHENKO Michael Alec | 100% | 97% | 84% | 55% | 24% | 6% | 1% |
34 | WANG Juehan | 100% | 94% | 71% | 38% | 13% | 2% | - |
35 | WHITE Ryden | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 60% | 16% | |
36 | SRINIVASAN Sanat Ram | 100% | 98% | 85% | 57% | 26% | 7% | 1% |
37 | LEE Lucas | 100% | 99% | 92% | 71% | 38% | 12% | 2% |
38 | REILLY August | 100% | 99% | 80% | 37% | 8% | 1% | |
39 | WANG Lucas | 100% | 99% | 89% | 65% | 32% | 9% | 1% |
40 | MYRAH Devin | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 31% | 8% | 1% |
41 | WANG Suian (Andy) | 100% | 96% | 77% | 42% | 13% | 2% | - |
42 | LEE Joshua | 100% | 83% | 46% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
43 | ZHENG Jason | 100% | 98% | 86% | 58% | 27% | 7% | 1% |
44 | LI Timothy | 100% | 100% | 98% | 90% | 67% | 33% | 8% |
45 | PARRA Lucas | 100% | 98% | 84% | 51% | 18% | 3% | - |
46 | LIN Daniel | 100% | 95% | 73% | 36% | 10% | 1% | - |
47 | BACON Corban | 100% | 87% | 54% | 22% | 5% | 1% | - |
48 | BREILING Sebastian | 100% | 97% | 79% | 44% | 14% | 2% | - |
49 | KIM Remington | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 39% | 10% |
50 | PARIKH Parth | 100% | 71% | 28% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
51 | PARK Sean | 100% | 70% | 28% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
52 | CHEN Hayden | 100% | 93% | 51% | 13% | 1% | - | |
53 | PATEL Krish | 100% | 91% | 59% | 23% | 5% | 1% | - |
54 | JU Shang | 100% | 79% | 42% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
55 | SHI Zhicheng | 100% | 97% | 73% | 35% | 10% | 2% | - |
56 | LAU Caleb | 100% | 89% | 55% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
57 | SUN Jiarui (Jerry) | 100% | 97% | 81% | 46% | 16% | 3% | - |
58 | LEE Leo | 100% | 99% | 90% | 67% | 35% | 10% | 1% |
59 | CHAN Joseph | 100% | 66% | 24% | 5% | - | - | - |
60 | MEHROTRA Darsh | 100% | 29% | 3% | - | - | - | |
61 | KHOT Rian | 100% | 42% | 8% | 1% | - | - | - |
62 | ZHAO Kyle Zekai | 100% | 86% | 50% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.