Greater Philadelphia Expo Center - Oaks, PA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | MYERS Dean | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 46% | 11% |
2 | TSIMIKLIS Yanni | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 41% |
3 | ZOBEL Eric H. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 78% |
3 | KATAYAMA Kevin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 59% |
5 | MCISAAC Finn | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 40% | 9% |
6 | KAPOOR Aayan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 21% | |
7 | DAVIDSON Elliot | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 46% | 6% |
8 | GRIFFITH MCALLISTER Thomas | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 56% | 16% |
9 | SIMONOV Timofey | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 27% |
10 | XU Andy P. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 36% |
11 | HOLLIS Sean | 100% | 99% | 87% | 55% | 20% | 4% | - |
12 | URIBE GOMEZ Sebastian Javier | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 86% | 42% | 8% |
13 | GUTH Joseph | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 36% | 7% |
13 | PARRA Fabian | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 37% |
13 | ZHAO Brian | 100% | 97% | 71% | 28% | 5% | < 1% | - |
16 | JOSEPH Willem | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 34% | |
17 | JURMAN Therin | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 46% | 13% | |
18 | STRAYER Andrew | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 24% |
19 | JIMENEZ Naveen | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 52% | 7% |
20 | ABRAMKIN Tim | 100% | 98% | 80% | 41% | 8% | < 1% | - |
21 | SCHLESINGER Nathan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 92% | 46% | |
22 | SENANI arjun | 100% | 96% | 74% | 37% | 9% | 1% | |
23 | ZHANG GAVIN J | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 33% | 7% | |
24 | WANG Rory | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 48% | 13% | |
25 | DEEB Adam | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 47% | 12% |
26 | GOGUEN-COMPAGNONI Nicholas | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 38% |
27 | PYO Michael M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 85% | 34% |
28 | NABI Masoud Masoud W. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 53% | 15% | 1% |
29 | KENNEDY christo | 100% | 98% | 82% | 48% | 17% | 3% | - |
30 | ZENG Rick | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 42% | 10% | |
31 | BAI Brian | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 53% | 16% | |
32 | SHIN Noah | 100% | 98% | 81% | 46% | 15% | 3% | - |
33 | DOBBINS Evan W. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 53% |
34 | HUANG Chenghan | 100% | 100% | 96% | 69% | 23% | 1% | - |
35 | BLACK Zachary | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 71% | 34% | 7% |
36 | SHANNON Jack | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 43% | 13% | 1% |
37 | WONG Jacob W. | 100% | 93% | 66% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - |
38 | YAP Nathan | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 49% | 14% | |
39 | TANG xianchi | 100% | 95% | 63% | 24% | 5% | - | |
40 | SRINIVASAN Vedant | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 31% | 6% | |
41 | RIPA Joseph K. | 100% | 95% | 74% | 38% | 11% | 1% | |
42 | CHOI Benjamin | 100% | 98% | 81% | 40% | 6% | - | |
43 | ORLOV Dmitriy | 100% | 100% | 92% | 65% | 27% | 5% | |
44 | BAI Austin | 100% | 97% | 76% | 39% | 11% | 1% | |
45 | O'BRIEN Jack K. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 43% | 8% |
46 | MILLER Dillon | 100% | 99% | 87% | 56% | 19% | 3% | - |
47 | THOMAS Liam | 100% | 100% | 94% | 65% | 25% | 4% | - |
48 | CHA James | 100% | 97% | 81% | 47% | 16% | 3% | - |
49 | BAKER Stephen | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 30% |
50 | KAO Alexander H. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 47% | 12% | 1% |
51 | HAN Alexander | 100% | 97% | 76% | 39% | 11% | 1% | - |
52 | LEE Charles T | 100% | 97% | 81% | 45% | 13% | 2% | |
53 | LYNCH Owen C. | 100% | 99% | 92% | 64% | 26% | 4% | |
54 | ZHAO Brandon | 100% | 97% | 74% | 31% | 4% | - | |
55 | GORLOVITZKI Amitai | 100% | 86% | 51% | 18% | 3% | - | |
56 | JABLOKOV Roman | 100% | 95% | 51% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
57 | MILLER Andrew | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 69% | 19% | 2% |
58 | STAFFORD Gareth | 100% | 95% | 72% | 35% | 10% | 1% | - |
59 | STURGIS Zachary C. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 74% | 34% | 6% | - |
60 | LIGOS Alex M. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 60% | 19% | |
61 | TOOMRE Kai | 100% | 98% | 78% | 36% | 7% | - | - |
62 | MATTOS Luis Felipe | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 36% | 8% | |
63 | GATES Combustion | 100% | 100% | 91% | 51% | 11% | - | - |
64 | WANG Xicheng | 100% | 37% | 6% | - | - | - | |
65 | POWELL Sean | 100% | 80% | 35% | 7% | - | - | |
66 | SEIB-LEVINSON Conrad | 100% | 98% | 80% | 45% | 14% | 2% | |
67 | ONIK Ari N. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 40% | 4% | - |
68 | METZ Mason | 100% | 99% | 86% | 47% | 10% | 1% | - |
69 | GREENE Amit | 100% | 96% | 63% | 21% | 3% | - | - |
70 | SANTIAGO Elias | 100% | 96% | 73% | 35% | 9% | 1% | |
71 | KUO Phineas | 100% | 96% | 75% | 33% | 6% | - | - |
72 | GODIN Willis | 100% | 80% | 40% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
73 | CHUN Zachary | 100% | 76% | 29% | 5% | - | - | - |
74 | LANGEN Carter M. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 42% | 11% | 1% |
75 | XU Dinghui Ryan | 100% | 100% | 96% | 71% | 30% | 5% | - |
76 | MANLAPAZ Jan Vincent | 100% | 70% | 17% | 2% | - | - | - |
77 | SHEA William | 100% | 90% | 58% | 23% | 5% | - | |
78 | KIM Yoonsoo | 100% | 65% | 23% | 4% | - | - | |
79 | BELOKON Sammy | 100% | 91% | 51% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
80 | KWON Chase | 100% | 81% | 39% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
81 | PISTEA Mark | 100% | 98% | 84% | 53% | 21% | 4% | - |
82 | TANG Jeremy | 100% | 71% | 27% | 5% | - | - | - |
83 | GALLER Dave | 100% | 95% | 73% | 38% | 11% | 2% | - |
84 | ELSAYED Ahmed | 100% | 94% | 71% | 37% | 12% | 2% | - |
85 | BUNDUS Luca | 100% | 53% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
86 | BRIDGES Nicholas | 100% | 17% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
87 | SABATINO Patrick | 100% | 55% | 16% | 2% | - | - | |
88 | TIBBETTS Justin | 100% | 82% | 43% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
88 | OH Joshua | 100% | 44% | 8% | 1% | - | - | - |
90 | ZHENG Alan | 100% | 92% | 60% | 22% | 3% | - | - |
91 | KIM John | 100% | 66% | 20% | 2% | - | - | |
92 | HOWARD Fox | 100% | 65% | 24% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
93 | RUPP Keegan E. | 100% | 30% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.