Rio Hotel and Casino - Las Vegas, NV, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
# | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
1 | CREMEL Remi | V V V V V V | V V V V V V | 4.5 | 6 | +1.5 |
2 | PARK Avan | V V D V V V | V V V V V D | 4.7 | 5 | +0.3 |
3 | TAO Jiemi | V V V V V V | V V V V D | 5.5 | 6 | +0.5 |
3 | JIN Yucheng | V D V V V V | V V V V D | 4.6 | 5 | +0.4 |
5 | YANG Steve | V V V V V V | V V V D | 5.2 | 6 | +0.8 |
6 | JIN George | V V V V V V | V V V D | 5.3 | 6 | +0.7 |
7 | TURBAT Travis | V V V V D V | V V V D | 5.0 | 5 | - |
8 | LIN Sampson | V V V D V V | V V V D | 4.1 | 5 | +0.9 |
9 | WANG Eason | V V V V V V | V V D | 4.4 | 6 | +1.6 |
10 | TSUI Kaylan Ho Sen | V V V V V | V V D | 3.4 | 5 | +1.6 |
11 | CHEN Kyle | V D V V V V | V V D | 4.8 | 5 | +0.2 |
12 | WU Gengze (Daniel) | V V V V D V | V V D | 5.0 | 5 | - |
13 | KIAYIAS Anthony | D V V V V V | V V D | 4.4 | 5 | +0.6 |
14 | MAZAHERI John | V V V V D V | V V D | 4.5 | 5 | +0.5 |
15 | YU Jinyuan | V V V V V D | V V D | 4.5 | 5 | +0.5 |
16 | HUANG Owen | D V D D V V | V V D | 3.8 | 3 | -0.8 |
17 | LU Brandon | V V V V V V | V D | 5.4 | 6 | +0.6 |
18 | LOZANO Koen Alexander | V V D V V V | V D | 3.4 | 5 | +1.6 |
19 | CAO Benjamin | D V V V V V | V D | 3.6 | 5 | +1.4 |
20 | HUANG Dalynn | V D V V V | V D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
21 | SUN Lucas | V V V V D D | V D | 3.3 | 4 | +0.7 |
22 | YAN Aaron | V D D V V V | V D | 2.4 | 4 | +1.6 |
23 | FANG Lionel | D V D V V V | V D | 2.6 | 4 | +1.4 |
24 | LI Lief | D V V D V V | V D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
25 | ZHANG alex | D V D V V V | V D | 2.7 | 4 | +1.3 |
26 | TAN benjamin | D V V D V V | V D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
27 | LI Yunze | D D V V V D | V D | 3.8 | 3 | -0.8 |
28 | SHENOY Neil | V V D D V D | V D | 2.7 | 3 | +0.3 |
29 | LIN Stewart | D D D V V V | V D | 1.7 | 3 | +1.3 |
30 | ZHANG William | V D V D D | V D | 3.3 | 2 | -1.3 |
31 | LIGERET Leo | D V D D V | V D | 2.3 | 2 | -0.3 |
32 | VIEN Bradley | D V V D D D | V D | 3.1 | 2 | -1.1 |
33 | PESKIN Kepler | V D V V V V | D | 4.7 | 5 | +0.3 |
34 | NGUYEN Norris | V V V V D D | D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
35 | KAJITA Grayson | D V V V V D | D | 3.3 | 4 | +0.7 |
36 | MENG Andy | V V V D D V | D | 2.4 | 4 | +1.6 |
37 | CHEN Dante | V D V D V V | D | 3.7 | 4 | +0.3 |
37 | GU Evan | D V V V V D | D | 2.0 | 4 | +2.0 |
39 | MENG Eric | V V D V V D | D | 2.7 | 4 | +1.3 |
40 | WU Vincent Moxiao | D D V V V V | D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
41 | WANG Theodore | V V D V V D | D | 2.4 | 4 | +1.6 |
42 | RAJ Yojith | V D V D D V | D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
43 | RYU Griffin | D V D V V D | D | 3.3 | 3 | -0.3 |
44 | ROSOWSKY Phoenix | D V D V D | D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
45 | LI Mason | V V D D D D | D | 3.0 | 2 | -1.0 |
46 | CHANG Owen | V D V D D D | D | 2.6 | 2 | -0.6 |
47 | LIN Dylan | D D V V D D | D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
48 | FOO Kingston | D D V D D V | D | 3.9 | 2 | -1.9 |
49 | LEE Elliot | D D V D D V | D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
50 | ZENG Cayden | V D D D V D | D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 |
51 | DONG YIKUN | D D V D D V | D | 1.5 | 2 | +0.5 |
52 | AN Jacob | V D D D D V | D | 1.3 | 2 | +0.7 |
53 | WANG Ian | V V D D D D | V D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
54 | LIN Evan | V D V D D D | V D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
55 | WU KADEN | V V D D D D | V D | 2.7 | 2 | -0.7 |
56 | WU Yulen | D V D D V D | V D | 2.8 | 2 | -0.8 |
57 | NGO Lincoln | D D D D D V | V D | 1.8 | 1 | -0.8 |
58 | CREMEL Louis | D D D D V D | V D | 0.8 | 1 | +0.2 |
58 | XU Daniel | D D D D V D | V D | 3.3 | 1 | -2.3 |
60 | FUNG Caleb | D D D V D D | V D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 |
61 | FAZIO Lorenzo | D D V D D D | V D | 2.1 | 1 | -1.1 |
62 | LI Ethan | V D D D D D | V D | 1.3 | 1 | -0.3 |
63 | YIN Luke | D D D D D D | V D | 2.9 | 0 | -2.9 |
64 | XIA Wenhao | D D D D D D | V D | 2.9 | 0 | -2.9 |
65 | BAGWELL Theodore | D V V D D D | D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
66 | XU Benjamin | D D D D D V | D | 1.2 | 1 | -0.2 |
67 | WU William | V D D D D D | D | 0.3 | 1 | +0.7 |
68 | KIM Noah | D D D D D V | D | 0.4 | 1 | +0.6 |
69 | SASOMSUP Kaison | D D V D D D | D | 1.2 | 1 | -0.2 |
70 | BIGELOW Francis | D D D V D D | D | 2.1 | 1 | -1.1 |
71 | TIKHONOV Aleksandr | V D D D D D | D | 1.8 | 1 | -0.8 |
72 | FUNG Lucas | D D D D D | D | 0.5 | 0 | -0.5 |
73 | CHANG Joshua | D D D D D D | D | 2.1 | 0 | -2.1 |
74 | STOCK Ian | D D D D D D | D | 0.7 | 0 | -0.7 |
75 | AN Graham | D D D D D D | D | 2.6 | 0 | -2.6 |
76 | ZIMMERMAN Luke | D D D D D D | D | 3.6 | 0 | -3.6 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
---|---|---|---|
Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.