Fredericksburg Convention Center - Fredericksburg, VA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | GRIFFITH MCALLISTER Thomas | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 67% |
| 2 | WHEELOCK Bryan M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 24% |
| 3 | LIM Charlie | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 39% | 6% | |
| 3 | BELOKON Sammy | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 52% | 17% | 2% |
| 5 | METZ Mason | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 46% | 12% | |
| 6 | PRUT Anton | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 43% | 11% | |
| 7 | HAN Alexander | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 38% | 8% | |
| 8 | LU Nathan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 21% |
| 9 | SMOLICH Marat | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 37% |
| 10 | YU William | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 44% | 11% | |
| 11 | CLARK Benjamin | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 52% | 15% | |
| 12 | TAM Kyle | 100% | 99% | 91% | 62% | 22% | 2% | |
| 13 | EMENHEISER Conrad | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 54% | |
| 14 | POWELL Sean | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 55% | 21% | 3% |
| 15 | GORLOVITZKI Amitai | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 50% | 18% | 2% |
| 16 | FERRONE Nate | 100% | 93% | 59% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
| 17 | ELSAYED Ahmed | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 30% | 8% | 1% |
| 18 | YANG David H. | 100% | 99% | 90% | 66% | 33% | 8% | 1% |
| 19 | GADIYARAM Madhav | 100% | 99% | 89% | 64% | 30% | 7% | - |
| 20 | GRINER Kevin | 100% | 98% | 85% | 55% | 23% | 5% | - |
| 21 | HARWOOD Gray | 100% | 98% | 87% | 59% | 26% | 6% | - |
| 22 | SMITH Finnley | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 29% | 5% | |
| 23 | DELANNES-MOLKA Daniel | 100% | 100% | 94% | 71% | 33% | 8% | 1% |
| 24 | SHEA William | 100% | 94% | 66% | 27% | 5% | - | |
| 25 | SALAZAR Tomas D. | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 26% | 5% | |
| 26 | CLARK Robert | 100% | 99% | 90% | 61% | 24% | 4% | |
| 27 | RAMESH Prashvin | 100% | 89% | 59% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 28 | PHILLIPS Oliver | 100% | 63% | 20% | 3% | - | - | |
| 29 | KARLEKAR Ved | 100% | 68% | 25% | 5% | - | - | |
| 30 | CHAN Geoffrey | 100% | 98% | 83% | 48% | 16% | 2% | - |
| 31 | HAN Nathan | 100% | 46% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 32 | LEE Noah | 100% | 83% | 41% | 11% | 1% | - | |
| 33 | MACKAY Ian | 100% | 53% | 14% | 2% | - | - | |
| 34 | BAZZLE Christopher E. | 100% | 97% | 81% | 50% | 19% | 3% | - |
| 35 | FLYNN Oliver | 100% | 78% | 39% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 36 | SINGH Meet | 100% | 89% | 54% | 19% | 4% | - | |
| 37 | LAZAREANU Justin | 100% | 92% | 65% | 30% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 38 | RHEE Josiah | 100% | 97% | 80% | 48% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 39 | ERTZBERGER Joel | 100% | 95% | 69% | 28% | 5% | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.