May SJCC

Cadet Men's Saber

Sunday, May 18, 2025 at 8:00 AM

Reno-Sparks Convention Center - Reno, NV, USA

Probability density of pool victories

Reset

Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.

# Name Number of victories
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
1 ZHAO Lucas - - - 2% 14% 41% 43%
2 SO Preston - - - 3% 18% 42% 37%
3 MEHAN Nicholas - - 1% 7% 25% 41% 26%
3 WONG Lucas - 1% 6% 19% 34% 30% 10%
5 IM Tyler - 3% 13% 29% 32% 18% 4%
6 MEYERSON Jacob - - 3% 15% 35% 35% 12%
7 YANG Phillip - 1% 4% 16% 33% 33% 13%
8 NGUYEN Anthony - 2% 12% 30% 35% 18% 3%
9 KIM Kendrick - - 1% 7% 23% 40% 28%
10 OH Aster - - 3% 13% 31% 37% 16%
11 KOVALEV Daniil N. - - 1% 5% 21% 42% 31%
11 SANGSTER Arden - - 4% 17% 36% 34% 9%
13 SKARBONKIEWICZ Maksymilian A. - - - 4% 21% 44% 31%
14 BIAN Hongyu - 2% 10% 29% 40% 20%
15 CRICOL Damian - 2% 12% 31% 35% 18% 3%
16 STURGEON Cole - 1% 10% 28% 36% 20% 4%
17 TANI Tino - - 5% 20% 38% 30% 7%
18 ZHOU William - 1% 11% 29% 35% 19% 4%
19 WEI Rian - 1% 9% 26% 36% 23% 5%
20 CHAN Henry 3% 18% 35% 30% 12% 2%
21 YAP Kah Kai (Cayden) - - 2% 13% 33% 36% 14%
22 GREENSTEIN Viktor - 5% 23% 37% 26% 8% 1%
23 KITSON Chase 1% 8% 22% 32% 25% 10% 2%
24 SANCHEZ Jacob - 1% 7% 23% 37% 26% 6%
25 BEKDJANOV Arthur 1% 14% 36% 33% 14% 3% -
26 HWANG Jayden - - 1% 6% 23% 42% 29%
28 CAO Donald 1% 7% 22% 33% 26% 10% 1%
29 WANG Max - 2% 10% 26% 35% 22% 5%
30 LI Yidong A. - 2% 12% 33% 35% 16% 2%
31 LI Ayden - 1% 5% 19% 34% 31% 10%
32 BURGESS Beckham - 2% 13% 29% 34% 18% 4%
33 GAY Jono - - 4% 17% 34% 32% 11%
34 LEE Brian - 6% 25% 37% 24% 7% 1%
35 LIU Aaron 2% 14% 30% 32% 18% 5% 1%
36 CHAMBERS Miles - - - 6% 28% 45% 20%
37 MINASIAN Mason 2% 11% 28% 33% 20% 6% 1%
38 GREMILLION Obadiah - 1% 8% 23% 35% 26% 7%
39 KANG Matthew - - 4% 20% 41% 28% 6%
39 WONG David 1% 6% 19% 32% 29% 13% 2%
41 HOLZ Lucas - 3% 15% 33% 35% 13%
42 AIKMAN Kai 17% 38% 30% 12% 2% - -
43 BELL III Alfred (Tripp) R. - - 4% 17% 36% 33% 10%
44 ZHANG Kaixuan - 2% 15% 33% 33% 15% 2%
45 IYER Neil 1% 6% 22% 34% 26% 10% 1%
46 LI linze 1% 9% 26% 33% 22% 7% 1%
47 XIAO Brayden - 5% 18% 33% 29% 13% 2%
48 KANG Jeremy 2% 11% 27% 32% 21% 7% 1%
48 LIU Daniel 7% 28% 36% 21% 7% 1% -
50 SU Kingston 1% 11% 35% 39% 13% 2% -
51 AROUNA Ilan 1% 8% 25% 35% 23% 7% 1%
52 GATTO Enzo P. 30% 42% 22% 6% 1% - -
53 LIU Yijin 1% 22% 40% 27% 8% 1% -
54 WANG Max 2% 11% 28% 33% 20% 6% 1%
55 HO Anson - 5% 19% 35% 29% 10% 1%
56 BRUM Charles E. 12% 34% 35% 16% 3% - -
57 LOO Jason 6% 24% 36% 25% 8% 1%
58 EKAMBARAM Nikhil 5% 27% 40% 22% 5% 1% -
59 YOOK Isaac - 2% 10% 27% 36% 21% 4%
60 PEREIRA Beckham 2% 11% 30% 34% 19% 5% -
60 WONG Ron 8% 28% 36% 21% 6% 1% -
62 BROWN Andrew 19% 38% 30% 11% 2% -
63 CHEN Shawn 2% 13% 31% 32% 17% 4% -
64 LIN Philip T. - 1% 5% 17% 34% 32% 12%
65 LEE Nathan Uju 2% 14% 32% 32% 16% 4% -
66 BRIMMER Robert (Trey) - 4% 17% 32% 30% 14% 3%
67 HWANG Hagan 1% 9% 27% 35% 22% 6% -
68 LIAO Yifong 5% 29% 40% 20% 5% - -
69 FIROOZI Sam 4% 36% 39% 17% 4% - -
70 DOOLEY Atticus 8% 36% 39% 15% 3% - -
71 SADHU Neiyam - 1% 9% 29% 37% 20% 3%
72 SLAVNOV Anton 2% 15% 32% 32% 15% 4% -
73 NAIR Sujit 2% 13% 32% 33% 16% 3% -
74 KANIA Alexander 6% 26% 36% 23% 7% 1% -
75 AMEN Oscar 33% 45% 19% 3% - - -
76 BAGGA Shray 9% 36% 37% 15% 3% - -
77 KOVACHEV Martin 2% 14% 35% 33% 14% 3% -
78 GRIGORIEV Roman 2% 12% 29% 34% 19% 5% -
79 LEE Brady 5% 23% 36% 26% 9% 1%
80 KATZ Nico 52% 38% 9% 1% - - -
81 IRVINE Patrick 18% 38% 30% 11% 2% - -
82 GONZALEZ Mark 26% 42% 25% 7% 1% - -
83 ROBUCHON Aleksandr 8% 26% 34% 23% 8% 2% -
84 WESTMORELAND-BROWN Cole 41% 40% 15% 3% - - -
85 KIM Enoch 82% 17% 1% - - - -
86 HERRERA Stefano 55% 36% 8% 1% - - -
87 DARTER Cody 4% 28% 43% 20% 4% - -
88 FENECH Francois J. 7% 28% 36% 22% 6% 1% -
88 CHEN Xiangyi 8% 32% 38% 18% 4% - -
88 SMITH Etienne 84% 15% 1% - - - -
91 MYSZ Jacob 7% 29% 38% 20% 5% 1% -

Explanation

The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:

This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.