Reno-Sparks Convention Center - Reno, NV, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | ZHAO Lucas | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 43% |
| 2 | SO Preston | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 37% |
| 3 | MEHAN Nicholas | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 26% |
| 3 | WONG Lucas | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 74% | 40% | 10% |
| 5 | IM Tyler | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 54% | 22% | 4% |
| 6 | MEYERSON Jacob | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 47% | 12% |
| 7 | YANG Phillip | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 79% | 46% | 13% |
| 8 | NGUYEN Anthony | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 57% | 21% | 3% |
| 9 | KIM Kendrick | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 28% |
| 10 | OH Aster | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 53% | 16% |
| 11 | KOVALEV Daniil N. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 31% |
| 11 | SANGSTER Arden | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 43% | 9% |
| 13 | SKARBONKIEWICZ Maksymilian A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 75% | 31% |
| 14 | BIAN Hongyu | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 60% | 20% | |
| 15 | CRICOL Damian | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 56% | 21% | 3% |
| 16 | STURGEON Cole | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 60% | 24% | 4% |
| 17 | TANI Tino | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 37% | 7% |
| 18 | ZHOU William | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 58% | 23% | 4% |
| 19 | WEI Rian | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 64% | 28% | 5% |
| 20 | CHAN Henry | 100% | 97% | 79% | 44% | 13% | 2% | |
| 21 | YAP Kah Kai (Cayden) | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 51% | 14% |
| 22 | GREENSTEIN Viktor | 100% | 100% | 94% | 72% | 35% | 9% | 1% |
| 23 | KITSON Chase | 100% | 99% | 91% | 69% | 36% | 11% | 2% |
| 24 | SANCHEZ Jacob | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 32% | 6% |
| 25 | BEKDJANOV Arthur | 100% | 99% | 85% | 49% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 26 | HWANG Jayden | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 71% | 29% |
| 28 | CAO Donald | 100% | 99% | 92% | 70% | 37% | 11% | 1% |
| 29 | WANG Max | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 62% | 27% | 5% |
| 30 | LI Yidong A. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 53% | 18% | 2% |
| 31 | LI Ayden | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 75% | 41% | 10% |
| 32 | BURGESS Beckham | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 56% | 22% | 4% |
| 33 | GAY Jono | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 78% | 44% | 11% |
| 34 | LEE Brian | 100% | 100% | 94% | 69% | 32% | 8% | 1% |
| 35 | LIU Aaron | 100% | 98% | 84% | 54% | 23% | 5% | 1% |
| 36 | CHAMBERS Miles | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 66% | 20% |
| 37 | MINASIAN Mason | 100% | 98% | 87% | 59% | 26% | 6% | 1% |
| 38 | GREMILLION Obadiah | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 68% | 33% | 7% |
| 39 | KANG Matthew | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 34% | 6% |
| 39 | WONG David | 100% | 99% | 94% | 75% | 43% | 15% | 2% |
| 41 | HOLZ Lucas | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 48% | 13% | |
| 42 | AIKMAN Kai | 100% | 83% | 44% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
| 43 | BELL III Alfred (Tripp) R. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 43% | 10% |
| 44 | ZHANG Kaixuan | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 50% | 17% | 2% |
| 45 | IYER Neil | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 37% | 11% | 1% |
| 46 | LI linze | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 31% | 8% | 1% |
| 47 | XIAO Brayden | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 44% | 15% | 2% |
| 48 | KANG Jeremy | 100% | 98% | 87% | 61% | 28% | 7% | 1% |
| 48 | LIU Daniel | 100% | 93% | 65% | 29% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 50 | SU Kingston | 100% | 99% | 88% | 53% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 51 | AROUNA Ilan | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 32% | 8% | 1% |
| 52 | GATTO Enzo P. | 100% | 70% | 29% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 53 | LIU Yijin | 100% | 99% | 76% | 36% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 54 | WANG Max | 100% | 98% | 87% | 60% | 27% | 6% | 1% |
| 55 | HO Anson | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 40% | 11% | 1% |
| 56 | BRUM Charles E. | 100% | 88% | 54% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
| 57 | LOO Jason | 100% | 94% | 70% | 34% | 9% | 1% | |
| 58 | EKAMBARAM Nikhil | 100% | 95% | 68% | 28% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 59 | YOOK Isaac | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 61% | 25% | 4% |
| 60 | PEREIRA Beckham | 100% | 98% | 87% | 57% | 24% | 5% | - |
| 60 | WONG Ron | 100% | 92% | 64% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 62 | BROWN Andrew | 100% | 81% | 43% | 13% | 2% | - | |
| 63 | CHEN Shawn | 100% | 98% | 85% | 53% | 21% | 4% | - |
| 64 | LIN Philip T. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 77% | 44% | 12% |
| 65 | LEE Nathan Uju | 100% | 98% | 84% | 52% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 66 | BRIMMER Robert (Trey) | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 47% | 17% | 3% |
| 67 | HWANG Hagan | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 28% | 6% | - |
| 68 | LIAO Yifong | 100% | 95% | 65% | 25% | 5% | - | - |
| 69 | FIROOZI Sam | 100% | 96% | 61% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
| 70 | DOOLEY Atticus | 100% | 92% | 56% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
| 71 | SADHU Neiyam | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 60% | 23% | 3% |
| 72 | SLAVNOV Anton | 100% | 98% | 83% | 51% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 73 | NAIR Sujit | 100% | 98% | 85% | 53% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 74 | KANIA Alexander | 100% | 94% | 67% | 31% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 75 | AMEN Oscar | 100% | 67% | 22% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 76 | BAGGA Shray | 100% | 91% | 55% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
| 77 | KOVACHEV Martin | 100% | 98% | 84% | 49% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 78 | GRIGORIEV Roman | 100% | 98% | 87% | 57% | 24% | 5% | - |
| 79 | LEE Brady | 100% | 95% | 72% | 36% | 10% | 1% | |
| 80 | KATZ Nico | 100% | 48% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 81 | IRVINE Patrick | 100% | 82% | 44% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 82 | GONZALEZ Mark | 100% | 74% | 33% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 83 | ROBUCHON Aleksandr | 100% | 92% | 66% | 33% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 84 | WESTMORELAND-BROWN Cole | 100% | 59% | 19% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 85 | KIM Enoch | 100% | 18% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
| 86 | HERRERA Stefano | 100% | 45% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 87 | DARTER Cody | 100% | 96% | 67% | 24% | 4% | - | - |
| 88 | FENECH Francois J. | 100% | 93% | 65% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 88 | CHEN Xiangyi | 100% | 92% | 60% | 22% | 4% | - | - |
| 88 | SMITH Etienne | 100% | 16% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
| 91 | MYSZ Jacob | 100% | 93% | 64% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.