York Fencing Club - York, PA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | METZ Mason | - | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 41% | 22% |
2 | STURGIS Zachary C. | - | - | 2% | 13% | 33% | 37% | 15% |
3 | BLACK Henry | 6% | 23% | 35% | 25% | 9% | 2% | - |
3 | GODIN Willis | 7% | 24% | 34% | 24% | 9% | 2% | - |
5 | BAYER John P. | - | - | 2% | 19% | 45% | 33% | 2% |
6 | BLAM Aaron | - | - | 4% | 19% | 37% | 31% | 9% |
7 | WATSON Logan | - | 3% | 17% | 38% | 32% | 9% | - |
8 | LAZAR Carolina | 5% | 20% | 34% | 28% | 12% | 2% | - |
9 | NICUDEMUS Bryella | - | 2% | 16% | 36% | 32% | 12% | 2% |
10 | KIM Aiden | - | 2% | 11% | 29% | 35% | 19% | 4% |
11 | LEE Ethan | - | 3% | 13% | 29% | 33% | 18% | 3% |
12 | STURGIS Bruce T. | - | - | - | - | 5% | 40% | 55% |
13 | LEE Hans | - | 3% | 21% | 38% | 28% | 9% | 1% |
14 | KRAMER Ryan | 1% | 7% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 6% | - |
15 | RUSANOV Oleg | - | - | 3% | 15% | 35% | 35% | 12% |
16 | GORDON Rachel A. | - | 1% | 7% | 23% | 35% | 26% | 7% |
17 | ROSA II Carl D. | 1% | 6% | 20% | 33% | 28% | 11% | 2% |
18 | DAVIS Connor | - | 5% | 24% | 38% | 25% | 7% | 1% |
19 | HINTON Nickolys R. | - | 3% | 12% | 27% | 33% | 21% | 5% |
20 | NAUGHTON Aidan | 27% | 41% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
21 | NOVOTNY Felicia A. | 1% | 8% | 33% | 44% | 14% | 1% | - |
22 | JANKOWSKI Jakob | 1% | 10% | 28% | 34% | 20% | 6% | 1% |
23 | REARDON Isabella | 48% | 44% | 8% | 1% | - | - | - |
24 | GANT Ansley | 43% | 42% | 13% | 2% | - | - | - |
25 | AGNEW Charlie | 17% | 46% | 30% | 6% | - | - | - |
26 | ZAIDI Sohail | 2% | 11% | 28% | 33% | 20% | 6% | 1% |
27 | TEVIS Kyle | 2% | 11% | 28% | 33% | 20% | 6% | 1% |
28 | ALLEN Augustus | 27% | 51% | 19% | 3% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.