Burlington, NJ - Burlington, NJ, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | NG Jonathan H. | - | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 41% | 26% |
| 2 | MORRILL William | - | - | - | 4% | 19% | 43% | 34% |
| 3 | CHAN Matthew | - | - | 2% | 9% | 28% | 40% | 21% |
| 3 | LEMPERT Levy A. | - | 1% | 10% | 31% | 37% | 17% | 3% |
| 5 | SO Hananiah | - | - | 2% | 11% | 33% | 39% | 15% |
| 6 | LUKASHENKO Darii | - | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 44% | 26% |
| 7 | HUANG Ethan F. | - | 3% | 14% | 31% | 33% | 16% | 2% |
| 8 | KIM-COGAN Ryan | - | 1% | 6% | 20% | 36% | 29% | 8% |
| 9 | ZHANG Jeffrey | 1% | 6% | 21% | 35% | 27% | 10% | 1% |
| 10 | YUAN Kevin | - | 2% | 10% | 28% | 35% | 21% | 4% |
| 11 | WILSON Jude | - | - | 1% | 12% | 41% | 46% | |
| 12 | MORRILL Justin | - | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 41% | 20% |
| 13 | ALTIRS Alexander | 2% | 11% | 29% | 34% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 14 | DENNER Maximilian P. | - | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 42% | 25% |
| 15 | OWENS Harrison J. | - | 2% | 12% | 31% | 35% | 18% | 3% |
| 16 | NOBLE Colin | 4% | 18% | 32% | 29% | 14% | 4% | - |
| 17 | HONG Vincent Q. | 2% | 12% | 28% | 32% | 20% | 6% | 1% |
| 18 | SHTEYN Mark | 2% | 21% | 40% | 28% | 8% | 1% | |
| 19 | BUCHMANN Finn D. | - | 2% | 13% | 35% | 39% | 12% | |
| 20 | HO Kaden M. | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 39% | 21% | 3% |
| 22 | HU Andrew | - | 1% | 8% | 24% | 35% | 25% | 7% |
| 23 | GU Samuel | - | - | 3% | 14% | 32% | 36% | 14% |
| 24 | FIELDS Matthew S. | - | 2% | 10% | 25% | 34% | 23% | 6% |
| 25 | EPSTEIN Oliver D. | 1% | 10% | 27% | 34% | 21% | 6% | 1% |
| 26 | MALONE Gregory D. | - | 2% | 13% | 32% | 34% | 16% | 3% |
| 27 | RAUSCHER Ryan | 5% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 28 | SULLIVAN Aidan J. | 3% | 20% | 39% | 30% | 9% | 1% | |
| 29 | GOLD Jackson | 5% | 21% | 35% | 27% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 30 | WANG Robert | - | 5% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 8% | 1% |
| 31 | CHAUDHURI Eeshaan A. | 18% | 38% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 32 | CHENG Cody | 3% | 15% | 32% | 32% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 33 | APTER Robert A. | 1% | 6% | 20% | 34% | 28% | 10% | 1% |
| 34 | CHAN Austin | - | 1% | 8% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 6% |
| 35 | ZHENG Edward L. | 1% | 9% | 27% | 35% | 22% | 6% | 1% |
| 36 | SANDERS Samuel B. | 15% | 38% | 33% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 37 | KIM Matthew | 1% | 7% | 28% | 39% | 21% | 4% | - |
| 38 | GEORGE Daniel | 35% | 43% | 18% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 39 | KOVACH Jonah F. | 1% | 8% | 23% | 33% | 25% | 9% | 1% |
| 40 | KOGAN Nikita | - | 1% | 9% | 26% | 36% | 22% | 5% |
| 41 | HUANG Connor | 1% | 8% | 24% | 35% | 24% | 7% | 1% |
| 42 | MCCARTHY Gabriel | 2% | 19% | 39% | 31% | 9% | 1% | |
| 43 | CHENG Kyle | 23% | 39% | 27% | 9% | 2% | - | - |
| 44 | HONG Justin | - | 5% | 21% | 36% | 27% | 9% | 1% |
| 45 | SKABICH Nicholas | 8% | 36% | 36% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 46 | LEONARD Charles | 2% | 13% | 30% | 32% | 17% | 4% | - |
| 47 | MEDVEDEV Michail D. | 12% | 34% | 34% | 16% | 4% | - | - |
| 49 | LIN Steve | 17% | 38% | 31% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 50 | TONG Luke | 8% | 31% | 37% | 19% | 5% | - | - |
| 51 | CHANG Yufeng | 3% | 19% | 35% | 29% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 52 | ZENG Noah | 22% | 42% | 28% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 53 | MOULTON Ian | 57% | 35% | 8% | 1% | - | - | |
| 54 | OH Triton | 20% | 41% | 28% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.