Burlington, NJ - Burlington, NJ, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
# | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
1 | NG Jonathan H. | V V V V V V | V V V V V | 4.9 | 6 | +1.1 |
2 | MORRILL William | V V V V V V | V V V V D | 5.0 | 6 | +1.0 |
3 | CHAN Matthew | V V V V V V | V V V D | 4.7 | 6 | +1.3 |
3 | LEMPERT Levy A. | V V V V D V | V V V D | 3.7 | 5 | +1.3 |
5 | SO Hananiah | V V V V V V | V V D | 4.5 | 6 | +1.5 |
6 | LUKASHENKO Darii | V V V V V V | V V D | 4.9 | 6 | +1.1 |
7 | HUANG Ethan F. | V V V V V V | V V D | 3.5 | 6 | +2.5 |
8 | KIM-COGAN Ryan | V D V V V V | V V D | 4.1 | 5 | +0.9 |
9 | ZHANG Jeffrey | V V V V D V | V V D | 3.2 | 5 | +1.8 |
10 | YUAN Kevin | V V V V D V | V V D | 3.8 | 5 | +1.2 |
11 | WILSON Jude | V V V D V | V V D | 4.3 | 4 | -0.3 |
12 | MORRILL Justin | V V D V D V | V V D | 4.7 | 4 | -0.7 |
13 | ALTIRS Alexander | V D V D V V | V V D | 2.7 | 4 | +1.3 |
14 | DENNER Maximilian P. | V D V V V D | V V D | 4.8 | 4 | -0.8 |
15 | OWENS Harrison J. | V D D V V V | V V D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
16 | NOBLE Colin | D D D V D V | V V D | 2.4 | 2 | -0.4 |
17 | HONG Vincent Q. | V V D V V V | D | 2.8 | 5 | +2.2 |
18 | SHTEYN Mark | D V V V V | V D | 2.2 | 4 | +1.8 |
19 | BUCHMANN Finn D. | V V V V D | V D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
20 | HO Kaden M. | V V D V D V | V D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
22 | HU Andrew | V V D V V D | V D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
23 | GU Samuel | V V V D D V | V D | 4.4 | 4 | -0.4 |
24 | FIELDS Matthew S. | D V V V D D | V D | 3.9 | 3 | -0.9 |
25 | EPSTEIN Oliver D. | D V D D V V | V D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
26 | MALONE Gregory D. | D D V V D V | V D | 3.6 | 3 | -0.6 |
27 | RAUSCHER Ryan | D D V D V V | V D | 2.1 | 3 | +0.9 |
28 | SULLIVAN Aidan J. | V D D V D | V D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 |
29 | GOLD Jackson | D D D D V V | V D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 |
30 | WANG Robert | V V D D D D | V D | 3.1 | 2 | -1.1 |
31 | CHAUDHURI Eeshaan A. | D V V D D D | V D | 1.4 | 2 | +0.6 |
32 | CHENG Cody | D D D V V D | V D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
33 | APTER Robert A. | D V D V V D | D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
34 | CHAN Austin | V V V D D D | D | 3.9 | 3 | -0.9 |
35 | ZHENG Edward L. | D D V V V D | D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
36 | SANDERS Samuel B. | D V D D V V | D | 1.5 | 3 | +1.5 |
37 | KIM Matthew | V D V D V D | D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
38 | GEORGE Daniel | D V V D D V | D | 0.9 | 3 | +2.1 |
39 | KOVACH Jonah F. | D D D V V D | D | 3.0 | 2 | -1.0 |
40 | KOGAN Nikita | V V D D D D | D | 3.9 | 2 | -1.9 |
41 | HUANG Connor | D V D V D D | D | 3.0 | 2 | -1.0 |
42 | MCCARTHY Gabriel | D D D D V | D | 2.3 | 1 | -1.3 |
43 | CHENG Kyle | D D V D D D | D | 1.3 | 1 | -0.3 |
44 | HONG Justin | D D D V D D | D | 3.2 | 1 | -2.2 |
45 | SKABICH Nicholas | D D D D V D | D | 1.7 | 1 | -0.7 |
46 | LEONARD Charles | D V D D D D | D | 2.6 | 1 | -1.6 |
47 | MEDVEDEV Michail D. | D D D D V D | D | 1.7 | 1 | -0.7 |
49 | LIN Steve | V D D D D D | D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 |
50 | TONG Luke | D D D D V D | D | 1.8 | 1 | -0.8 |
51 | CHANG Yufeng | D D D D D D | D | 2.3 | 0 | -2.3 |
52 | ZENG Noah | D D D D D D | D | 1.2 | 0 | -1.2 |
53 | MOULTON Ian | D D D D D | D | 0.5 | 0 | -0.5 |
54 | OH Triton | D D D D D D | D | 1.3 | 0 | -1.3 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
---|---|---|---|
Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.