Boston Fencing Club - Boston, MA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | LAI Aedin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 66% | |
| 2 | TRULL A.J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 66% |
| 3 | ZAYDMAN David M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 61% |
| 3 | SONG Troy | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 21% |
| 5 | SIALA Omar | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 34% | 10% | 1% |
| 6 | XIE Brandon | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 65% | 30% | 6% |
| 7 | FEINBERG James Y. | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 29% | 5% | |
| 8 | RADZIKOWSKI Sam | 100% | 96% | 74% | 36% | 8% | 1% | |
| 9 | MOSKOWITZ Martin | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 40% | 12% | 2% |
| 10 | WANG Zichun | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 43% |
| 11 | TRAN Spencer | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 25% | |
| 12 | LIU Jeremiah W. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 57% | 21% | 2% |
| 13 | WANG Xiangdong | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 45% | 7% |
| 14 | BAJAJ Nakul | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 51% | 17% | 2% |
| 15 | KABA Elias | 100% | 99% | 86% | 52% | 17% | 2% | |
| 16 | YIN Chujun | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 34% | 8% | |
| 17 | ZHANG Jonathan | 100% | 93% | 66% | 31% | 8% | 1% | |
| 18 | PAN Anthony | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 27% | 4% | |
| 19 | MCMILLAN Jackson V. | 100% | 99% | 86% | 52% | 17% | 2% | |
| 20 | ERIKSEN Casey | 100% | 95% | 73% | 37% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 21 | WANG-SONG Evan | 100% | 99% | 85% | 52% | 19% | 3% | - |
| 22 | KOPPENHEFFER Rowan | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 33% | 7% | - |
| 23 | SONG Changze | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 37% | 8% | |
| 24 | ZOU Xianyang (Max) | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 32% | |
| 25 | MEN Junda | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 76% | 41% | 11% |
| 26 | SUH Aiden | 100% | 99% | 89% | 59% | 24% | 5% | - |
| 27 | ZHENG Jason | 100% | 96% | 74% | 36% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 28 | DOWD Peter L. | 100% | 97% | 82% | 50% | 18% | 3% | |
| 29 | GLUSHKOV David | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 27% | 3% | |
| 30 | O'BRIEN Eamon | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 39% | 9% | |
| 31 | HOLBROOK Joshua | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 31% | 7% | |
| 32 | CHEN Tianjun | 100% | 94% | 69% | 32% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 33 | GU Eric | 100% | 71% | 29% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 34 | LIN Lucas | 100% | 87% | 52% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
| 35 | MANSFIELD Hunter | 100% | 96% | 76% | 39% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 36 | BRESLAV Asher | 100% | 33% | 5% | - | - | - | |
| 37 | ORESKOVIC Olivier | 100% | 96% | 74% | 37% | 9% | 1% | |
| 38 | OTTAVIANO Aaron | 100% | 94% | 69% | 31% | 7% | 1% | |
| 39 | MITSCH Aubrey | 100% | 90% | 60% | 24% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 40 | WU Chi Kuan | 100% | 98% | 80% | 45% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 41 | ZHANG Roland | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 42% | 10% | 1% |
| 42 | FOGEL Jake | 100% | 64% | 22% | 4% | - | - | |
| 43 | ROSIELLO Francesco | 100% | 82% | 45% | 15% | 3% | - | |
| 44 | LI Ray | 100% | 97% | 78% | 41% | 12% | 1% | |
| 45 | CHALLAMEL Hadrien | 100% | 60% | 19% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 46 | NIXON-PERONI Micah | 100% | 98% | 85% | 56% | 24% | 5% | - |
| 47 | SHONEMAN Sam | 100% | 99% | 83% | 48% | 15% | 2% | |
| 47 | PESSIN Nadav | 100% | 96% | 74% | 37% | 9% | 1% | |
| 49 | WHITE Aidan | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 26% | 5% | - |
| 50 | CAFASSO Alexander | 100% | 92% | 63% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 51 | SONPAL Winslow | 100% | 47% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 52 | SATDEV Thomas | 100% | 95% | 73% | 37% | 11% | 2% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.