Burlington, NJ - Burlington, NJ, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | DUBOIS Lauren N. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 40% |
| 2 | MAREK Sofia | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 69% | 25% | |
| 3 | VADASZ Ibla P. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 55% | 14% |
| 3 | MIKA Veronica | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 47% | 13% | |
| 5 | PAUL Lila | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 29% |
| 6 | SOURIMTO Valeria | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 51% | 12% |
| 7 | YUN Emma | 100% | 94% | 70% | 34% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 8 | YUAN Greta | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 60% | 20% | |
| 9 | ENGELMAN Madeline A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 47% |
| 10 | ADEBANKE Niara | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 39% | 10% | |
| 11 | HILD Nisha | 100% | 98% | 83% | 46% | 13% | 1% | |
| 12 | LEE Sophia | 100% | 99% | 89% | 61% | 24% | 4% | |
| 13 | REN Xinling | 100% | 96% | 75% | 35% | 8% | 1% | |
| 14 | NAYAK Anika | 100% | 91% | 60% | 23% | 5% | - | - |
| 15 | FESTA Carina | 100% | 97% | 81% | 45% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 16 | ANTHONY Alexia B. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 38% | 8% | - |
| 17 | DUCKETT Madison | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 61% | 20% | |
| 18 | NATH Trisha | 100% | 91% | 58% | 22% | 4% | - | |
| 19 | ANGIOLETTI Kazandra | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 54% | 19% | 2% |
| 20 | FEIG Sela | 100% | 94% | 65% | 26% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 21 | HE Lizbeth | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 46% | 9% |
| 22 | SHINCHUK Ellisha | 100% | 82% | 43% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 23 | NG Sarah W. | 100% | 99% | 91% | 62% | 24% | 4% | |
| 24 | YOUNG Charlotte G. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 49% | 13% | |
| 25 | MESSICK Maya | 100% | 77% | 35% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 26 | LEUNG Ashlyn K. | 100% | 95% | 74% | 38% | 11% | 1% | |
| 27 | YOUNG Audrey | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 46% | 13% | 1% |
| 28 | LI Sophie | 100% | 94% | 68% | 32% | 8% | 1% | |
| 29 | HUANG Julia | 100% | 95% | 74% | 38% | 11% | 1% | |
| 30 | GUILFOYLE Alanna | 100% | 83% | 42% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 31 | XIAO julie | 100% | 97% | 80% | 48% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 32 | MONTORIO Lily M. | 100% | 70% | 25% | 4% | - | - | |
| 33 | XU ALINA | 100% | 98% | 83% | 48% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 34 | NAYAK Esha | 100% | 65% | 23% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 35 | CHOU Zoe | 100% | 98% | 81% | 43% | 12% | 1% | - |
| 36 | GOMERMAN Sophia | 100% | 92% | 64% | 27% | 6% | 1% | |
| 37 | JAVERI Amaya | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 40% | 9% | 1% |
| 38 | PRADO-TUCKER Isabel | 100% | 84% | 44% | 12% | 1% | - | |
| 39 | WU Helen | 100% | 91% | 55% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.