Vivo Fencing Club - Haverhill, MA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | BELLIVEAU Raven C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 38% | |
| 2 | WU Joseph | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 82% |
| 3 | GLUSHKOV David | 100% | 96% | 75% | 40% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 3 | SIALA Omar | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 41% | 9% | |
| 5 | WILSON Ian G. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 58% | 21% | 1% |
| 6 | MOSKOWITZ Martin | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 29% | 6% |
| 7 | DJONOUMA Toyohm | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 65% | 29% | 5% |
| 8 | BAJAJ Nakul | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 65% | 29% | 6% |
| 9 | WU Jonathan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 42% |
| 10 | KIM Nathan | 100% | 91% | 58% | 20% | 3% | - | |
| 11 | MEN Junda | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 48% | 14% |
| 12 | ROBINSON Garrett | 100% | 88% | 53% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
| 13 | PARIGIAN Alexander | 100% | 91% | 62% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 14 | BELLIVEAU Emmett S. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 58% | 19% | |
| 15 | MANSFIELD Hunter | 100% | 94% | 68% | 28% | 6% | - | |
| 16 | MORI Seneca | 100% | 97% | 74% | 31% | 5% | - | |
| 17 | SMITH Troy H. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 55% | 14% | |
| 18 | MICKEY Christopher J. | 100% | 92% | 62% | 24% | 5% | - | |
| 19 | OSHIMA Robert | 100% | 72% | 30% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 20 | SMALL Brayden | 100% | 92% | 52% | 14% | 2% | - | |
| 21 | ZENG Andrew | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 36% | 7% | |
| 22 | LIU Jeremiah W. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 28% | 5% |
| 23 | LIN Lucas | 100% | 83% | 46% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
| 24 | MCMILLAN Jackson V. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 78% | 44% | 12% | 1% |
| 25 | RUSSELL Edward | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 63% | 26% | 4% |
| 26 | ZELIN Sam J. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 42% | 9% | |
| 27 | WHITE Aidan | 100% | 97% | 80% | 45% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 28 | HOLLAND Parker | 100% | 94% | 72% | 37% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 29 | BUMPUS Isaias | 100% | 76% | 35% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 30 | SZCZAPA Lukas | 100% | 90% | 54% | 17% | 2% | - | |
| 31 | MCENTEE Owen | 100% | 96% | 76% | 39% | 10% | 1% | |
| 32 | QUIRK Dylan | 100% | 98% | 84% | 53% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 33 | ALVES PEREIRA Francisco Xavier | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 25% | 4% | |
| 34 | CHOY Ida | 100% | 81% | 41% | 11% | 2% | - | |
| 35 | CULLER Michael (Mike) D. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 30% | |
| 36 | DOLLARHITE Tommy | 100% | 95% | 72% | 36% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 37 | HILLEGEIST Ash | 100% | 90% | 61% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 38 | REELS Eric J. | 100% | 90% | 60% | 24% | 5% | - | - |
| 39 | MAES Heather J. | 100% | 90% | 59% | 24% | 5% | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.