Twin Cities Fencing Club - St. Paul, MN, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
1 | GARRETT Samuel | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 73% |
2 | KUNJAN Lena R. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 73% | 27% |
3 | BISSEN Quinn | 100% | 100% | 97% | 69% | 27% | 4% |
3 | XIONG Angelica | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 67% | 24% |
5 | ROWLAND Marsden | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 85% | 36% |
6 | SIEDOW William | 100% | 100% | 89% | 54% | 16% | 2% |
7 | OBERLY Nicholas | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 40% | 10% |
8 | HORAN Sean T. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 33% |
9 | TAKATA Benjamin | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 61% | 19% |
10 | ROBBINS Christopher (Chris) W. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 91% | 47% | 5% |
11 | HARRISKING Benjamin | 100% | 97% | 77% | 40% | 11% | 1% |
12 | OZANNE Jeffrey S. | 100% | 93% | 67% | 31% | 8% | 1% |
13 | CHO Joseph | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 28% | 5% |
14 | JORGENSEN Kjirsten | 100% | 78% | 30% | 3% | - | - |
15 | GLENNON Michael | 100% | 100% | 99% | 86% | 42% | 5% |
16 | STONE Ken | 100% | 69% | 23% | 3% | - | - |
17 | SOTO Michael | 100% | 96% | 75% | 36% | 8% | - |
18 | TOLLEFSON Zachary | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 36% | 8% |
18 | FRALEY Orion | 100% | 100% | 90% | 31% | 4% | - |
20 | CHIEM Karen | 100% | 88% | 51% | 16% | 2% | - |
21 | YATES Graeme | 100% | 97% | 80% | 47% | 16% | 2% |
22 | BLAT Robert | 100% | 98% | 87% | 56% | 19% | 2% |
23 | RUBIN Joshua | 100% | 97% | 77% | 35% | 6% | - |
24 | FLANIGAN Kendra | 100% | 95% | 73% | 35% | 8% | 1% |
25 | CAVEN Emerald | 100% | 63% | 9% | - | - | - |
26 | JORGENSEN Rebekah | 100% | 53% | 7% | - | - | - |
26 | WILLIAMSON Ryan | 100% | 97% | 79% | 43% | 11% | 1% |
28 | CULVER Hannah | 100% | 75% | 32% | 7% | 1% | - |
28 | LI Ziyue | 100% | 87% | 51% | 17% | 3% | - |
30 | SCHLIEP Anna J. | 100% | 74% | 32% | 7% | 1% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.