Brandeis University - Waltham, MA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | LIN Maxim | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 53% |
| 2 | MORALES Jonathan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 31% |
| 3 | BARTOLO Domenic V. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 55% | |
| 3 | GHAYALOD ansh | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 47% | |
| 5 | LAUB William | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 65% | 22% | |
| 6 | PIWOWAR Alex | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 65% | 23% | |
| 7 | CORTEZ Christopher | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 38% | |
| 8 | CHENG Brandon | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 27% | 5% | - |
| 9 | WITCZAK Mateus | 100% | 95% | 72% | 35% | 9% | 1% | |
| 10 | GONG Jerry | 100% | 100% | 99% | 85% | 47% | 9% | |
| 11 | WANG Daniel | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 71% | 28% | |
| 12 | SASSI Ilyas | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 54% | 19% | 2% |
| 13 | DREYER William | 100% | 97% | 81% | 47% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 14 | RODRIGUEZ Darlin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 72% | 27% |
| 15 | KANG Evan R. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 82% | 43% | 7% | |
| 16 | ZONG Yujie | 100% | 96% | 73% | 35% | 8% | 1% | |
| 17 | KHOTLINE Daniel | 100% | 92% | 47% | 11% | 1% | < 1% | |
| 18 | WEISS Toby | 100% | 95% | 71% | 34% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 19 | TOZZI Massimo | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 43% | 11% | 1% |
| 20 | BASKIN Isaac | 100% | 99% | 89% | 59% | 21% | 3% | |
| 21 | LEE Damian | 100% | 84% | 43% | 10% | - | - | |
| 22 | SWIFT Owen | 100% | 96% | 76% | 39% | 10% | 1% | |
| 23 | COUNTS Nicholas | 100% | 87% | 52% | 18% | 3% | - | |
| 24 | LIU Eric | 100% | 78% | 36% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 25 | ATWOOD Griffin | 100% | 100% | 95% | 72% | 31% | 5% | |
| 26 | RINALDI Savio | 100% | 99% | 88% | 50% | 14% | 2% | |
| 27 | MCMAHON Chris J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 42% | |
| 28 | WASCO Andrew | 100% | 93% | 62% | 20% | 2% | - | |
| 29 | DAI Zihou | 100% | 91% | 56% | 18% | 2% | - | |
| 30 | WOLMART Zander | 100% | 69% | 26% | 5% | - | - | |
| 31 | KARAVAS Nicholas | 100% | 97% | 76% | 34% | 4% | - | |
| 32 | TORDO Garrett | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 24% | 3% | |
| 33 | EPLETT Nicholas | 100% | 87% | 51% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 34 | DENG Kenny | 100% | 100% | 93% | 67% | 27% | 5% | - |
| 35 | CRAWFORD William | 100% | 57% | 15% | 2% | - | - | |
| 36 | MCCARTHY Devan | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 45% | 11% | |
| 37 | HUROWITZ Maxwell | 100% | 97% | 74% | 33% | 7% | - | |
| 38 | COOKSON Leonardo | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 26% | 5% | - |
| 39 | DZIALO George A. | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 32% | 7% | - |
| 40 | MENZIES Liam | 100% | 52% | 14% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 41 | SORENSEN Walker | 100% | 95% | 71% | 33% | 8% | 1% | |
| 42 | PODDAR Shameek | 100% | 73% | 29% | 5% | - | - | |
| 43 | AVRAMIS Adam | 100% | 27% | 2% | - | - | - | |
| 44 | COURTIN Frederic | 100% | 81% | 42% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.