BEAVERTON, OR - BEAVERTON, OR, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | ARIETA Ryan T. | - | - | 4% | 17% | 36% | 32% | 10% |
2 | LARSEN Samuel F. | - | - | 2% | 11% | 31% | 39% | 17% |
3 | RAYLE Evan K. | - | - | 1% | 11% | 34% | 39% | 15% |
3 | MCGAW Julian E. | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 41% | 25% | |
5 | LAKE Adam | - | - | 2% | 11% | 30% | 39% | 18% |
6 | CRANOR Erich L. | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 41% | 21% | 4% |
7 | LEI Joshua | - | 1% | 5% | 23% | 38% | 27% | 7% |
8 | LI Brian X | 3% | 19% | 36% | 30% | 11% | 1% | |
9 | BENACK Steven M. | - | - | 1% | 7% | 28% | 42% | 21% |
10 | JOHNSON Lucas W. | - | 5% | 21% | 37% | 29% | 8% | |
11 | BODON Michele I. | - | - | 1% | 7% | 30% | 47% | 15% |
12 | DUCHOW Matthew D. | 1% | 12% | 32% | 36% | 16% | 3% | - |
13 | LAWLER Aidan | 9% | 35% | 38% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
14 | LEI Jacob | 1% | 8% | 26% | 38% | 23% | 5% | |
15 | HINMAN Andrew | 21% | 41% | 28% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
16 | CLINGSHOFF Christopher | 15% | 38% | 33% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
17 | FRANK Fred | 5% | 26% | 38% | 23% | 6% | 1% | |
18 | IYOKI Kent | - | - | 2% | 13% | 36% | 37% | 13% |
19 | DEO Ameya | 4% | 24% | 39% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - |
20 | ALGER Caleb (CJ) J. | - | 2% | 11% | 29% | 35% | 19% | 4% |
21 | VANDERVELDE Pierce F. | - | 6% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 7% | 1% |
22 | GULLO Kenji Y. | 24% | 44% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
23 | KLEIN Johannes | 2% | 20% | 39% | 29% | 9% | 1% | - |
24 | BRADLEY Noah W. | 24% | 44% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
25 | DESSAUER Tobyn M. | 3% | 18% | 39% | 31% | 9% | 1% | - |
26 | KILUK Andrew | 40% | 41% | 16% | 3% | - | - | |
27 | MANDERA Darsh | 63% | 31% | 5% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.