Brandeis University - Waltham, MA, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
# | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
1 | SKLAR Davida | V V V V V V | V V V V V | 4.8 | 6 | +1.2 |
2 | GARCIA Alysia | V V V V V V | V V V V D | 3.4 | 6 | +2.6 |
3 | BURNELL-WOJTECH River | D V V V V V | V V V D | 4.6 | 5 | +0.4 |
3 | ZULUAGA Sofia | V V V V V V | V V V D | 4.8 | 6 | +1.2 |
5 | DRON Lily | V V D V V V | V V D | 5.2 | 5 | -0.2 |
6 | POYNTON Cora | V V V D V | V V D | 2.8 | 4 | +1.2 |
7 | XIAO Katelyn | D D V V V | V V V D | 3.4 | 3 | -0.4 |
8 | ORDORICA Abra | V V D V D D | V V V D | 3.6 | 3 | -0.6 |
9 | CHERNOBRIVETS Maria | V V V V V V | V D | 3.2 | 6 | +2.8 |
10 | MARCHANT Morgan | V V V V V | V D | 4.0 | 5 | +1.0 |
11 | LI Yixin Catherine | V V V V V | V D | 4.3 | 5 | +0.7 |
12 | PHUONG Elaine | V V V V V | V D | 3.0 | 5 | +2.0 |
13 | SONG Charlotte | V V V V D | V V D | 2.7 | 4 | +1.3 |
14 | IVANOV Angela-Sophie | V D V V V | V V D | 1.6 | 4 | +2.4 |
15 | GERBOTH Lauren | V V D D V V | V V D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
16 | MURTALA Aisha | V D D D V V | V V D | 2.4 | 3 | +0.6 |
17 | ROSZKOWSKI Olivia | V V V V D V | D | 3.1 | 5 | +1.9 |
18 | SCHELTZ Kimberly | V V V V D | D | 3.3 | 4 | +0.7 |
19 | BRODEUR Andrea | D V V V V D | V D | 4.1 | 4 | -0.1 |
20 | ERIKSEN Kate | D V V V V D | V D | 1.8 | 4 | +2.2 |
21 | GORTI Aadya | D V D V V | V D | 1.4 | 3 | +1.6 |
22 | CUFF Addison | V V D V D | V D | 1.7 | 3 | +1.3 |
23 | SPRINGER Lily | V D V D D V | V D | 0.8 | 3 | +2.2 |
24 | TIBBETTS Lily | D D V V D | V D | 2.6 | 2 | -0.6 |
25 | STOCKTON Catherine | V D V D D | V D | 2.9 | 2 | -0.9 |
26 | CHOWRIRA Reynah | D V V D D | V D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
27 | ROQUE Alexis | V D D D V | V D | 4.1 | 2 | -2.1 |
28 | STEPTOE Cassandra | V D D D V D | V D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 |
29 | MAES Heather J. | D D V D V D | V D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
30 | GILMORE Lia | D D D V V D | V D | 2.3 | 2 | -0.3 |
31 | HALL Henrietta | D V D D D | V D | 2.1 | 1 | -1.1 |
32 | AUDET Scarlett | D D D D V | V D | 0.5 | 1 | +0.5 |
33 | WHEELER Michele L. | V V D D D V | D | 4.3 | 3 | -1.3 |
34 | LE NOC’H Farrah | V V D V D D | D | 2.0 | 3 | +1.0 |
35 | WESTERFELD Zoey | D D V V V D | D | 0.9 | 3 | +2.1 |
36 | SCHAU DeHavilland | D V D V D | D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
37 | BURNHAM Sarah | D V D D V | D | 3.1 | 2 | -1.1 |
38 | BALLOU Alexandra | D D V D V | D | 3.0 | 2 | -1.0 |
39 | LIPPA Eliana | V D D D V | D | 1.6 | 2 | +0.4 |
40 | LIU Ilana | D D D D V V | D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
41 | SETO Karen | D D V V D D | D | 3.4 | 2 | -1.4 |
42 | FRANKEL Abigail | D D D V D | D | 0.8 | 1 | +0.2 |
43 | AJAMIAN Deeba | V D D D D | D | 3.0 | 1 | -2.0 |
44 | AJAMIAN Nika | D V D D D D | D | 3.4 | 1 | -2.4 |
45 | SHUM Kayla | D D D V D D | D | 1.3 | 1 | -0.3 |
46 | ABRAMSON Liliana M. | D D V D D D | D | 3.9 | 1 | -2.9 |
47 | CROWDER Julia | D D D D V D | D | 1.9 | 1 | -0.9 |
48 | ONTIVEROS Sara D. | V D D D D D | D | 3.1 | 1 | -2.1 |
49 | BOYLE Bridget | D D D D D | D | 1.9 | 0 | -1.9 |
50 | LI Danlu | D D D D D D | D | 3.4 | 0 | -3.4 |
51 | MA Yanlei | D D D D D | D | 1.5 | 0 | -1.5 |
52 | MATSUO Kei | D D D D D D | D | 2.7 | 0 | -2.7 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
---|---|---|---|
Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.