Still Point Fencing - Tucson, AZ, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | ||
1 | KING Charles M. | - | - | 4% | 27% | 69% |
2 | KEITH michael | 7% | 33% | 43% | 16% | 1% |
3 | SYPES Michael A. | - | 3% | 22% | 48% | 26% |
3 | POPPRE Michael N. | - | - | 3% | 28% | 70% |
5 | CUEVAS Tom | 5% | 31% | 54% | 9% | - |
6 | HOWIE Ryan | 3% | 22% | 42% | 28% | 5% |
7 | IMHOF Adelia J. | - | 7% | 29% | 43% | 21% |
8 | ANDERSON Donald | 21% | 43% | 29% | 7% | - |
9 | SANKEY Joel | - | 1% | 14% | 67% | 18% |
10 | BLUM Chaston | 1% | 14% | 43% | 38% | 4% |
11 | SMITH Samuel J. | 9% | 38% | 38% | 13% | 1% |
12 | WELLING Michael | 42% | 46% | 12% | - | - |
13 | CHERNEK Stephen L. | 54% | 37% | 8% | 1% | - |
14 | FELDMAN Louis | 30% | 51% | 18% | 1% | - |
15 | BAKER Tina | 20% | 52% | 24% | 4% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.