Still Point Fencing - Tucson, AZ, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | ||
1 | KING Charles M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 69% |
2 | KEITH michael | 100% | 93% | 60% | 17% | 1% |
3 | SYPES Michael A. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 74% | 26% |
3 | POPPRE Michael N. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 70% |
5 | CUEVAS Tom | 100% | 95% | 64% | 10% | - |
6 | HOWIE Ryan | 100% | 97% | 75% | 34% | 5% |
7 | IMHOF Adelia J. | 100% | 100% | 93% | 64% | 21% |
8 | ANDERSON Donald | 100% | 79% | 36% | 7% | - |
9 | SANKEY Joel | 100% | 100% | 99% | 85% | 18% |
10 | BLUM Chaston | 100% | 99% | 85% | 41% | 4% |
11 | SMITH Samuel J. | 100% | 91% | 53% | 14% | 1% |
12 | WELLING Michael | 100% | 58% | 12% | - | - |
13 | CHERNEK Stephen L. | 100% | 46% | 9% | 1% | - |
14 | FELDMAN Louis | 100% | 70% | 19% | 1% | - |
15 | BAKER Tina | 100% | 80% | 28% | 4% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.