Baird Center - Milwaukee, WI, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | POPOKH Leo | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 42% |
2 | LOPEZ Reynaldo (REY) | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 58% | |
3 | FOELLMER Oliver K. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 56% | |
3 | ANDERSON Nathan T. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 92% | 35% | |
5 | KOEHN Ted | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 85% | 30% |
6 | KIM Ethan | 100% | 97% | 77% | 39% | 11% | 1% | - |
7 | SIRICO Thomas (Tommy) P. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 40% | |
8 | CHO Michael | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 93% | 50% |
9 | WYSZYNSKI Marek B. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% |
10 | RIFFATERRE Jason | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 76% | 21% | 2% |
11 | VALENTINE Iain | 100% | 100% | 100% | 92% | 61% | 20% | 1% |
12 | MONSEFI Amir | 100% | 99% | 91% | 60% | 17% | 1% | |
13 | HARKINS Craig T. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 76% | 26% | |
14 | ZHAO Zhiyong | 100% | 100% | 100% | 90% | 55% | 16% | 1% |
15 | DE BARROS CONTI Thibaut | 100% | 100% | 97% | 65% | 23% | 3% | - |
16 | KISSINGFORD John F. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 54% | 14% |
17 | POWERS Douglas A. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 41% | 10% | 1% |
18 | ORNELAS Polo | 100% | 79% | 26% | 2% | - | - | |
19 | NEEVEL David | 100% | 100% | 97% | 74% | 25% | 2% | |
20 | KRYLTSOV Greg | 100% | 100% | 92% | 54% | 6% | - | |
21 | CHENG Thomas | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 71% | 18% | |
22 | STOY Patrick | 100% | 86% | 48% | 12% | 1% | - | - |
23 | MAURIN Michael | 100% | 100% | 100% | 92% | 61% | 20% | 1% |
24 | JOO Michael | 100% | 89% | 54% | 16% | 2% | - | |
25 | RUSANOV Oleg | 100% | 98% | 80% | 29% | 2% | - | |
26 | TOWSTER Robert | 100% | 79% | 35% | 7% | - | - | |
27 | JEFFCOAT Timothy | 100% | 98% | 81% | 41% | 7% | - | - |
28 | MISTRETTA Alex | 100% | 92% | 62% | 25% | 5% | - | - |
29 | NEWELL Tim | 100% | 61% | 13% | 1% | - | - | |
30 | BORG Daniel | 100% | 66% | 17% | 1% | - | - | |
31 | GERACI Paul A. | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 31% | 7% | 1% |
32 | SPRINGER Michael | 100% | 81% | 39% | 8% | 1% | - | |
33 | BERKE Daniel (Dan) L. | 100% | 97% | 72% | 22% | 2% | - | |
34 | LOTURCO Greg | 100% | 38% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
35 | THOMAS Jr. Robert D. | 100% | 77% | 34% | 7% | - | - | - |
36 | CHAO Pierre | 100% | 89% | 52% | 14% | 1% | - | - |
37 | GOLLNICK Brian | 100% | 67% | 24% | 4% | - | - | - |
38 | FELDMAN Louis | 100% | 52% | 11% | 1% | - | - | |
39 | RUTH Erin | 100% | 70% | 7% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.