Baird Center - Milwaukee, WI, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | DANG Kelia | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 30% |
2 | MANN Sophia J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 90% | 63% | 23% |
3 | DRAGON Rainer | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 53% |
3 | DAVIS Jayna M. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 60% | 23% | 4% |
5 | KHAN Alissa | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 74% | 32% |
6 | TABANGAY Heartlyn | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 40% |
7 | LIU Sydney | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 63% | 22% |
8 | XIAO Cindy | 100% | 97% | 80% | 47% | 17% | 3% | - |
9 | LIM Jaslene | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 55% | 17% |
10 | KONDEV Elizabeth | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 30% | |
11 | ONG Lauren | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 37% | 11% | 1% |
12 | LO Chloe | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 46% | 15% | 2% |
13 | NGUYEN Siena | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 25% | |
14 | MUNGUIA Mila | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 48% | 17% | 3% |
15 | TENG Christine Renmei | 100% | 97% | 80% | 45% | 13% | 1% | |
16 | SPEARS Mya B | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 48% | 13% |
17 | LIU kai yin aria | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 58% | 24% | 4% |
18 | YUEN Nicole | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 62% | 26% | 4% |
19 | MACKAY Katherine | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 57% | 22% | 3% |
20 | SINGER Ellery | 100% | 97% | 83% | 50% | 17% | 2% | |
21 | CHAVAN Arya | 100% | 98% | 84% | 51% | 17% | 2% | |
22 | HAMMERSTROM Aria | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 39% | 8% |
23 | XU Emily T. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 37% | 8% |
24 | CHEN Elaine | 100% | 100% | 95% | 78% | 46% | 15% | 2% |
25 | YAO Rainie | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 32% | 7% | |
25 | WANG Jiayi | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 30% | 6% | |
27 | GOLDIN Nina | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 33% | |
28 | DANTULURI Shalini | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 34% | 7% | |
29 | LI Alexis | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 47% | 12% | |
30 | GREENBAUM Ella K. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 57% | |
31 | TONG Laurie | 100% | 92% | 64% | 27% | 6% | - | |
32 | ELLIS-FURLONG Ava | 100% | 97% | 81% | 45% | 13% | 2% | |
33 | RANDALL-COLLINS Shea M. | 100% | 87% | 53% | 20% | 4% | < 1% | - |
34 | YANG Lea | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 62% | 22% |
35 | KIM Satie | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 42% | 13% | 1% |
36 | HUA Catherine W. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 32% | 7% |
37 | WILSON Eva | 100% | 99% | 85% | 51% | 15% | 2% | - |
38 | MERCHANT Aishwarya | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 73% | 38% | 9% |
39 | STAPLETON Lindsay K. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 70% | 20% |
40 | WALLER London | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 39% | 11% | 1% |
41 | SCOTT Eve | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 59% | 20% |
42 | XIE Nora | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 73% | 39% | 10% |
43 | GOLOVITSER Maya | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 32% | 6% |
44 | MATSUO Kei | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 38% | 8% |
44 | HUGHES-WILLIAMS Adelayde | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 35% | 9% | 1% |
46 | SCHOON REBECCA | 100% | 88% | 56% | 22% | 5% | 1% | - |
47 | BUHAY Kirsten M. | 100% | 97% | 80% | 47% | 16% | 2% | |
48 | JEFFORDS Sophia | 100% | 94% | 70% | 33% | 8% | 1% | |
49 | ASHTIANI Shaya | 100% | 86% | 51% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
50 | HALPERIN Elizabeth H. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 78% | 45% | 15% | 2% |
50 | BARROSO Isabela | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 28% | 5% |
52 | FOSS Persephone | 100% | 96% | 73% | 33% | 7% | 1% | - |
53 | ISBERG Natalie | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 47% | 11% | 1% |
54 | KANG Soeun | 100% | 85% | 45% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
55 | TAN Adelyn | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 46% | 12% |
56 | COLTER Aurora | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 31% | 6% |
57 | HU Michelle | 100% | 100% | 96% | 82% | 50% | 18% | 3% |
58 | PRESANTH Nandana | 100% | 93% | 66% | 29% | 7% | 1% | |
59 | ZHAN Sophie | 100% | 95% | 72% | 36% | 10% | 1% | |
60 | MOON Claire | 100% | 81% | 43% | 13% | 2% | - | |
61 | LITTLE Avery | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 31% | 5% |
62 | COLBY Mercer | 100% | 95% | 74% | 40% | 13% | 2% | - |
63 | RAGHURAMAN Anishka | 100% | 98% | 87% | 58% | 26% | 6% | 1% |
64 | SHEARER Alena | 100% | 95% | 73% | 37% | 11% | 2% | - |
65 | CHERON Helene | 100% | 81% | 43% | 13% | 2% | - | |
66 | DEHON Inès | 100% | 97% | 81% | 49% | 18% | 3% | - |
67 | YE Madeleine | 100% | 79% | 40% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
68 | HUANG Neila | 100% | 96% | 70% | 32% | 8% | 1% | - |
69 | DUDNICK Morgan | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 48% | 16% | 2% |
69 | REAVIS Isabel | 100% | 98% | 86% | 53% | 19% | 4% | - |
71 | MARTURANO Bridget H. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 37% |
72 | MALLAMPATI Jaabili | 100% | 97% | 80% | 48% | 18% | 4% | - |
73 | KU Chloe | 100% | 89% | 58% | 23% | 5% | 1% | - |
74 | IREGUI Sofia | 100% | 88% | 52% | 16% | 2% | - | - |
75 | JOHNSON Neema | 100% | 97% | 79% | 43% | 12% | 1% | |
76 | KHOST Maeve | 100% | 86% | 50% | 16% | 3% | - | |
77 | ZHAI AMY | 100% | 98% | 85% | 53% | 18% | 2% | |
78 | PETTIT Sara M. | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 35% | 8% | |
79 | WONG Natalie | 100% | 94% | 69% | 31% | 7% | - | |
80 | NAYAK Antara | 100% | 79% | 40% | 11% | 1% | - | |
81 | FAN Alexandria | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 53% | 14% | |
82 | PABIAN Emilia | 100% | 100% | 95% | 78% | 46% | 16% | 2% |
83 | CHERUKURI Tanvi | 100% | 76% | 33% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
84 | TISSONE Veronica | 100% | 95% | 68% | 31% | 8% | 1% | - |
85 | JUDE Simona | 100% | 48% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
86 | BUTMAN Chloe Alexandra | 100% | 92% | 63% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - |
87 | XU Kaylyn | 100% | 96% | 73% | 34% | 9% | 1% | - |
88 | YANG Caroline | 100% | 81% | 42% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
89 | SADANI Jyotika | 100% | 92% | 65% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - |
90 | NAIR Supriya | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 40% | 12% | 1% |
91 | DEMARIA Lauren | 100% | 89% | 56% | 22% | 5% | 1% | - |
92 | GENTILE Vittoria | 100% | 95% | 74% | 38% | 11% | 1% | |
93 | DOLEV Rony | 100% | 80% | 40% | 11% | 1% | - | |
94 | KRASOWITZ Lucy | 100% | 95% | 74% | 38% | 11% | 1% | |
95 | LEE Kaitlin | 100% | 82% | 43% | 12% | 2% | - | |
96 | CHI Claire | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 33% | 9% | 1% |
97 | MYAT Chloe | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 39% | 12% | 1% |
98 | RANJAN Diya | 100% | 96% | 73% | 34% | 7% | 1% | - |
99 | MUELLER Amelia D. | 100% | 99% | 88% | 61% | 28% | 7% | 1% |
100 | YOO Audrey | 100% | 49% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
101 | PROBASCO Leila | 100% | 95% | 74% | 39% | 12% | 2% | - |
102 | BARCZAY Sara E. | 100% | 84% | 47% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
103 | BARBORIAK Emily | 100% | 83% | 42% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
104 | JACHYMIAK Emilia | 100% | 99% | 89% | 60% | 26% | 6% | - |
105 | LU Angela | 100% | 55% | 16% | 2% | - | - | - |
106 | KONZEN Iris | 100% | 64% | 21% | 3% | - | - | - |
106 | KAZA Ananya | 100% | 65% | 24% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.