Baird Center - Milwaukee, WI, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | KU Alathea-Joy | - | - | 4% | 20% | 43% | 33% | |
| 2 | GOLOVITSER Maya | - | 1% | 7% | 27% | 44% | 21% | |
| 3 | SCHAIBLE Sofia L. | - | 2% | 9% | 26% | 35% | 23% | 5% |
| 3 | SPEARS Mya B | - | - | - | 5% | 28% | 45% | 22% |
| 5 | SINGER Ellery | - | 3% | 13% | 32% | 37% | 16% | |
| 6 | RAGHURAMAN Anishka | 2% | 12% | 28% | 32% | 20% | 6% | 1% |
| 7 | TAN Adelyn | - | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 41% | 31% |
| 8 | ZHENG Valentina | - | - | 2% | 11% | 33% | 39% | 15% |
| 9 | CHEN Elaine | - | 1% | 9% | 26% | 40% | 24% | |
| 10 | NANDA Maanika | 7% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 8% | 1% | |
| 11 | LISSO Ria A. | - | - | 1% | 5% | 21% | 42% | 32% |
| 12 | ONG Lauren | - | 1% | 10% | 28% | 36% | 21% | 5% |
| 13 | YADAV Tishya | - | 5% | 18% | 32% | 30% | 13% | 2% |
| 14 | LEE Kaitlin | 6% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 8% | 1% | |
| 15 | SUN Angela | 18% | 37% | 30% | 12% | 3% | - | - |
| 16 | LUKER Hannah | - | 4% | 17% | 34% | 32% | 12% | |
| 17 | LIU Hannah | - | 6% | 28% | 44% | 19% | 3% | < 1% |
| 18 | DUDNICK Morgan | - | 3% | 15% | 33% | 35% | 14% | |
| 19 | KWON Hannah | - | 3% | 14% | 31% | 34% | 16% | 3% |
| 20 | MYAT Chloe | - | - | 2% | 12% | 30% | 37% | 18% |
| 21 | MCAFEE Jada | - | - | 4% | 19% | 36% | 31% | 9% |
| 22 | ZHAN Sophie | - | 1% | 5% | 20% | 37% | 29% | 8% |
| 23 | WONG Natalie | - | - | 2% | 12% | 31% | 38% | 17% |
| 24 | RANDALL-COLLINS Shea M. | 3% | 16% | 33% | 32% | 14% | 2% | |
| 25 | MERCHANT Aishwarya | - | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 41% | 29% |
| 26 | NAIR Supriya | - | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 42% | 28% |
| 27 | NEUMAN Ella | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 37% | 22% | 5% |
| 28 | MCSWEENEY Kylie | - | - | 3% | 13% | 33% | 37% | 14% |
| 29 | KIM Audrey | - | 5% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 9% | 1% |
| 30 | TISSONE Veronica | 10% | 30% | 35% | 19% | 5% | - | |
| 31 | HUA Catherine W. | - | - | 1% | 8% | 31% | 42% | 18% |
| 32 | ELLIS-FURLONG Ava | 1% | 9% | 25% | 35% | 24% | 7% | |
| 33 | ASHTIANI Shaya | - | 3% | 15% | 32% | 32% | 15% | 2% |
| 34 | CHI Claire | - | - | 4% | 18% | 37% | 31% | 9% |
| 35 | MUELLER Amelia D. | - | - | 5% | 18% | 34% | 31% | 11% |
| 36 | KNOBEL Sophia | - | - | 2% | 11% | 31% | 39% | 18% |
| 37 | TENG Christine Renmei | - | - | 1% | 8% | 28% | 41% | 22% |
| 38 | PETTIT Sara M. | - | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 40% | 21% |
| 39 | COLBY Mercer | 2% | 13% | 30% | 33% | 17% | 4% | - |
| 40 | XIAO Cindy | - | 2% | 13% | 30% | 33% | 17% | 3% |
| 41 | DUTA Lyra | 1% | 9% | 29% | 35% | 20% | 5% | 1% |
| 42 | KOSZYK Agnieszka | - | - | 4% | 21% | 44% | 30% | |
| 43 | CHANG Annette | - | 2% | 13% | 34% | 38% | 13% | |
| 44 | NG Sophia | - | 5% | 26% | 44% | 25% | ||
| 45 | MATSUO Kei | - | - | 3% | 15% | 33% | 35% | 14% |
| 45 | KU Chloe | - | 4% | 18% | 33% | 30% | 13% | 2% |
| 47 | HWANG Charlotte | - | 4% | 19% | 34% | 29% | 12% | 2% |
| 48 | VISWANATHAN Nishka | 1% | 8% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 6% | - |
| 49 | ZHAI AMY | - | - | 2% | 11% | 29% | 38% | 19% |
| 50 | HUGHES-WILLIAMS Adelayde | - | 1% | 4% | 16% | 33% | 33% | 13% |
| 51 | KHOST Maeve | - | 4% | 19% | 34% | 29% | 12% | 2% |
| 52 | KRIVOSHEEV Alexandra | - | 1% | 9% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 5% |
| 53 | MUNGUIA Mila | 1% | 6% | 21% | 34% | 27% | 10% | 1% |
| 54 | KRASOWITZ Lucy | 1% | 5% | 19% | 32% | 29% | 12% | 2% |
| 55 | PADANILAM Lily | 1% | 9% | 25% | 35% | 24% | 6% | |
| 56 | BORGUETA Madison | 1% | 5% | 19% | 34% | 29% | 11% | 2% |
| 57 | STONE Coral | - | 1% | 7% | 27% | 38% | 23% | 5% |
| 58 | HUANG Pierra | 2% | 14% | 30% | 32% | 17% | 4% | - |
| 59 | PHAN Genevieve | 2% | 14% | 32% | 34% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 60 | BARNES Sarah | - | 2% | 12% | 27% | 33% | 20% | 5% |
| 61 | FLEEGER Sophia | 7% | 28% | 38% | 21% | 5% | - | |
| 62 | NIU Jessica | 2% | 14% | 35% | 34% | 13% | 2% | |
| 63 | BUTMAN Chloe Alexandra | 9% | 27% | 35% | 22% | 7% | 1% | |
| 64 | MOON Claire | 1% | 8% | 25% | 35% | 23% | 7% | 1% |
| 65 | LITTLE Avery | - | - | - | 4% | 21% | 44% | 31% |
| 66 | JEFFORDS Sophia | - | 3% | 14% | 31% | 33% | 16% | 3% |
| 67 | HUANG Neila | 1% | 12% | 30% | 34% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 68 | GENTILE Vittoria | - | 1% | 8% | 24% | 35% | 25% | 7% |
| 69 | ERPELDING Emily | 1% | 15% | 37% | 32% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 70 | REAVIS Isabel | - | 1% | 8% | 23% | 35% | 25% | 7% |
| 71 | SHELLEY Scarlett | 1% | 19% | 42% | 30% | 7% | ||
| 72 | STAPLETON Lindsay K. | - | - | - | - | 3% | 24% | 73% |
| 73 | BANDHU Saahiti | 2% | 11% | 28% | 33% | 20% | 6% | 1% |
| 74 | JUDE Simona | 16% | 39% | 31% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 75 | NAYAK Esha | - | - | 2% | 12% | 31% | 38% | 17% |
| 76 | VATS Ishita | 1% | 10% | 26% | 34% | 22% | 7% | 1% |
| 77 | PARK Haylie | 1% | 8% | 26% | 35% | 23% | 7% | 1% |
| 78 | BAINS Nandini | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 38% | 22% | 4% |
| 79 | CLIFTON Nicole R. | - | - | 1% | 9% | 34% | 41% | 16% |
| 80 | SNOAD Indy | 7% | 25% | 34% | 23% | 8% | 2% | - |
| 81 | PRESANTH Nandana | 4% | 18% | 33% | 30% | 13% | 2% | |
| 82 | LOO Kaitlyn | - | 4% | 18% | 35% | 32% | 11% | |
| 83 | KONZEN Iris | 11% | 35% | 36% | 15% | 3% | - | |
| 84 | XA-CHIN Sara | 2% | 10% | 27% | 34% | 22% | 5% | |
| 85 | KANG Soeun | 2% | 14% | 31% | 32% | 16% | 4% | - |
| 86 | AKULA Roszlynn | - | 3% | 14% | 30% | 32% | 17% | 4% |
| 87 | XU Emily T. | - | - | 3% | 15% | 33% | 35% | 14% |
| 87 | WONG Cerise | 3% | 17% | 34% | 31% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 87 | TONG Laurie | - | 2% | 11% | 28% | 35% | 21% | 5% |
| 87 | MALLAMPATI Jaabili | 1% | 7% | 22% | 34% | 26% | 9% | 1% |
| 91 | YANG Caroline | 1% | 9% | 25% | 33% | 23% | 8% | 1% |
| 92 | SHEARER Alena | - | 2% | 10% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 5% |
| 93 | RANJAN Diya | 3% | 15% | 31% | 31% | 16% | 4% | - |
| 94 | SADANI Jyotika | 3% | 14% | 30% | 31% | 17% | 5% | - |
| 95 | XU Kaylyn | - | 3% | 15% | 35% | 33% | 12% | 2% |
| 96 | SCHOON REBECCA | - | 8% | 32% | 42% | 18% | ||
| 97 | CARLUCCI Laura A. | - | - | 4% | 17% | 38% | 35% | 5% |
| 98 | HUSS Miriam | 4% | 20% | 36% | 29% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 98 | TESTROET Aubrey | - | 1% | 7% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 6% |
| 100 | ISBERG Natalie | - | 1% | 8% | 24% | 35% | 25% | 7% |
| 101 | DESAUTELS Alexandra | 3% | 30% | 42% | 21% | 4% | ||
| 102 | MING Emma | 2% | 14% | 32% | 32% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 103 | LEUNG Ashlyn K. | - | 4% | 16% | 31% | 31% | 15% | 2% |
| 104 | CHERUKURI Tanvi | 6% | 26% | 37% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 105 | DOLEV Rony | 1% | 6% | 21% | 33% | 27% | 11% | 2% |
| 106 | PATIL Jyothi | 16% | 36% | 31% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
| 107 | ZHANG Erica | 3% | 16% | 33% | 32% | 14% | 2% | |
| 108 | DEHON Inès | 1% | 8% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 6% | |
| 109 | CHERON Helene | 6% | 27% | 39% | 22% | 5% | - | |
| 110 | PROBASCO Leila | 3% | 17% | 34% | 31% | 13% | 2% | |
| 111 | YAO Reeva | 7% | 29% | 38% | 21% | 4% | - | |
| 112 | CHEN Kasey | 1% | 9% | 29% | 38% | 20% | 3% | |
| 113 | WONG Charlene | 3% | 15% | 33% | 32% | 15% | 2% | |
| 114 | JACHYMIAK Emilia | 7% | 25% | 35% | 24% | 8% | 1% | |
| 115 | HILD Anya | 5% | 20% | 33% | 27% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 116 | ZHAO Jing | - | 1% | 9% | 30% | 38% | 19% | 3% |
| 117 | MCMAHON Kylin S. | - | 1% | 6% | 21% | 35% | 28% | 9% |
| 118 | YOO Audrey | 5% | 26% | 41% | 22% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 119 | DONDERIS Katherine | - | 3% | 15% | 32% | 33% | 15% | 3% |
| 119 | HENRY Erin | 30% | 42% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 119 | SAMPATH Medha | 19% | 37% | 29% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 122 | LAGUNA Genevieve | 4% | 20% | 35% | 29% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 123 | JUNG Elise | 6% | 27% | 40% | 22% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 124 | COOVADIA Malina | - | 10% | 29% | 35% | 20% | 6% | 1% |
| 125 | YERENKOVA Ameliia | 2% | 14% | 33% | 34% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 126 | WITEK Isabelle | 21% | 39% | 28% | 10% | 2% | - | |
| 127 | BARBORIAK Emily | 20% | 39% | 29% | 10% | 2% | - | |
| 128 | KOHLBERGER Noelle | - | < 1% | 3% | 12% | 29% | 37% | 19% |
| 129 | WAY Samantha | - | 1% | 5% | 19% | 35% | 31% | 10% |
| 130 | POLSTON Ella | 6% | 27% | 37% | 23% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 131 | CHIU Philippa | 20% | 43% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 132 | LIM Eunice | 3% | 29% | 44% | 21% | 3% | - | - |
| 133 | TAMARO Allie | 12% | 33% | 34% | 16% | 4% | - | - |
| 134 | JAJRA Avni | 26% | 44% | 24% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
| 135 | DEMARIA Lauren | 6% | 23% | 35% | 26% | 9% | 1% | |
| 136 | ATHOW Stephanie J. | 18% | 37% | 30% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 137 | WU Chloe | 37% | 45% | 16% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 138 | DANTULURI Shivani | 3% | 16% | 31% | 30% | 15% | 4% | - |
| 139 | LU Angela | 3% | 29% | 40% | 21% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 140 | MUTHAPPAN Sahana | - | 3% | 18% | 36% | 30% | 11% | 1% |
| 141 | SEELIG Samantha | 3% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 9% | 2% | - |
| 142 | BARCZAY Sara E. | 5% | 21% | 34% | 26% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 143 | NARAYANAN Sinduja | 6% | 29% | 37% | 21% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 144 | HAN Emma | - | 2% | 12% | 29% | 35% | 18% | 3% |
| 144 | KAZA Aditi | 55% | 36% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 146 | IREGUI Sofia | - | 10% | 29% | 35% | 20% | 6% | 1% |
| 147 | BANGALORE Shriya | 31% | 42% | 22% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
| 148 | MALVESTUTO Prudence | 41% | 43% | 14% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 148 | MADDEN Chloe | 72% | 24% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
| 148 | SOBERY Lillian | 5% | 35% | 43% | 16% | 2% | - | - |
| 151 | LADY Jamie | 22% | 45% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 152 | JAGROO Mary | - | 5% | 18% | 34% | 29% | 12% | 2% |
| 153 | KAZA Ananya | 32% | 43% | 21% | 4% | - | - | |
| 154 | BIESIADA Sophia | 9% | 31% | 37% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
| 155 | CAI Veronica | 7% | 27% | 36% | 23% | 7% | 1% | |
| 155 | WILFRET Katerina | 24% | 42% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 157 | WOLVERTON Emma | 75% | 23% | 2% | - | - | ||
| 158 | LYNCH Vivian | 71% | 26% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
| 159 | ALDORT Amanda | 4% | 19% | 34% | 30% | 12% | 2% | |
| 160 | NAKATA Gwyneth | 72% | 25% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
| 161 | KIM Alice | 42% | 40% | 15% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 162 | PERRY Madelyn | 10% | 31% | 34% | 19% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 163 | XIAO Sophia | 12% | 39% | 35% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 164 | BECERRA Karen | 25% | 42% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 165 | HOAGLAND Simone | 15% | 36% | 32% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
| 166 | MCCAWLEY Madeleine | 89% | 10% | - | - | - | - | - |
| 167 | CARNES Meghan | 2% | 14% | 29% | 31% | 18% | 5% | 1% |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.