Baird Center - Milwaukee, WI, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | ONG Lauren | - | - | 3% | 12% | 30% | 37% | 17% |
2 | DEHON Inès | - | - | 2% | 11% | 32% | 39% | 17% |
3 | COLBY Mercer | - | 1% | 11% | 33% | 39% | 16% | |
3 | DUTA Lyra | - | - | 2% | 13% | 33% | 37% | 14% |
5 | SHEARER Alena | - | - | 6% | 26% | 43% | 22% | 3% |
6 | YADAV Tishya | - | 5% | 19% | 35% | 31% | 10% | |
7 | PADANILAM Lily | - | - | 1% | 10% | 33% | 40% | 15% |
8 | CHERUKURI Tanvi | - | 3% | 16% | 34% | 32% | 13% | 2% |
9 | XA-CHIN Sara | - | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 41% | 30% |
10 | BUTMAN Chloe Alexandra | - | 2% | 13% | 32% | 37% | 16% | |
11 | HWANG Charlotte | - | 5% | 19% | 33% | 28% | 12% | 2% |
12 | ASHTIANI Shaya | - | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 40% | 21% |
13 | YE Madeleine | 2% | 13% | 30% | 32% | 17% | 5% | - |
14 | PARK Haylie | - | 2% | 11% | 28% | 35% | 20% | 3% |
15 | REAVIS Isabel | - | - | 4% | 19% | 40% | 30% | 7% |
16 | MCMAHON Kylin S. | - | - | 1% | 9% | 27% | 40% | 23% |
17 | DOLEV Rony | - | 2% | 10% | 25% | 34% | 23% | 6% |
18 | BARNES Sarah | - | 4% | 17% | 31% | 30% | 15% | 3% |
19 | FLEEGER Sophia | - | 8% | 29% | 36% | 21% | 5% | 1% |
20 | ISBERG Natalie | - | - | - | 2% | 11% | 38% | 49% |
21 | CHERON Helene | - | 4% | 18% | 35% | 30% | 11% | 1% |
22 | YANG Caroline | - | - | 4% | 19% | 39% | 33% | 5% |
23 | AKULA Roszlynn | 1% | 7% | 21% | 33% | 26% | 11% | 2% |
24 | SADANI Jyotika | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 37% | 27% | 7% |
25 | SHELLEY Scarlett | - | 2% | 13% | 31% | 34% | 17% | 3% |
26 | BAINS Nandini | - | 3% | 12% | 27% | 33% | 20% | 5% |
27 | KHOST Maeve | - | 3% | 13% | 29% | 33% | 18% | 4% |
28 | MOON Claire | - | 2% | 10% | 26% | 34% | 22% | 5% |
29 | SUN Angela | 2% | 22% | 41% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - |
30 | MING Emma | - | 4% | 14% | 30% | 32% | 17% | 3% |
31 | VATS Ishita | - | 3% | 18% | 35% | 31% | 11% | 1% |
32 | ALDORT Amanda | 1% | 5% | 18% | 32% | 29% | 13% | 2% |
33 | KU Chloe | - | 1% | 4% | 16% | 33% | 34% | 13% |
34 | HUA Catherine W. | - | - | - | - | 4% | 29% | 67% |
34 | PETTIT Sara M. | - | - | - | 2% | 12% | 39% | 47% |
36 | LIU Hannah | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 38% | 23% | 5% |
37 | NEUMAN Ella | - | 1% | 5% | 20% | 37% | 30% | 7% |
38 | KANG Soeun | - | 1% | 11% | 30% | 36% | 19% | 3% |
39 | HAN Emma | - | 3% | 13% | 29% | 32% | 18% | 4% |
40 | YOO Audrey | - | 6% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 7% | - |
41 | CLIFTON Nicole R. | - | - | - | 3% | 20% | 44% | 32% |
42 | CHANG Annette | - | 2% | 10% | 26% | 34% | 22% | 5% |
43 | MALLAMPATI Jaabili | - | 3% | 15% | 31% | 32% | 16% | 3% |
44 | JEFFORDS Sophia | - | 1% | 9% | 30% | 41% | 19% | |
45 | XU Kaylyn | - | 2% | 10% | 25% | 34% | 23% | 7% |
46 | KOHLBERGER Noelle | - | - | - | 1% | 10% | 39% | 51% |
47 | GUO Daisy | 2% | 13% | 34% | 34% | 15% | 3% | - |
48 | LU Angela | 2% | 19% | 42% | 29% | 8% | 1% | - |
49 | GOSAVI Aabolee | - | - | 5% | 20% | 38% | 30% | 7% |
50 | HILD Anya | - | 3% | 17% | 34% | 31% | 13% | 2% |
51 | POLSTON Ella | - | 4% | 18% | 34% | 30% | 12% | 2% |
52 | NANDA Maanika | - | 2% | 9% | 25% | 35% | 23% | 5% |
52 | KAZA Ananya | 6% | 22% | 35% | 26% | 10% | 2% | - |
54 | JACHYMIAK Emilia | - | 4% | 20% | 38% | 30% | 8% | |
55 | LAGUNA Genevieve | - | 3% | 17% | 39% | 32% | 9% | 1% |
56 | WONG Cerise | - | 4% | 17% | 31% | 30% | 14% | 3% |
57 | RANDALL-COLLINS Shea M. | - | - | 3% | 15% | 35% | 35% | 12% |
58 | LEUNG Ashlyn K. | - | 1% | 7% | 21% | 34% | 28% | 10% |
59 | SNOAD Indy | - | 4% | 17% | 32% | 31% | 14% | 2% |
60 | NAKATA Gwyneth | 15% | 42% | 32% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
61 | WITEK Isabelle | 4% | 22% | 37% | 27% | 9% | 1% | |
62 | PAINE Lily | - | - | < 1% | 3% | 17% | 41% | 39% |
63 | SAMPATH Medha | 4% | 19% | 34% | 28% | 12% | 2% | - |
64 | LADY Jamie | 9% | 32% | 38% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
65 | CHEN Kasey | - | 2% | 14% | 34% | 35% | 14% | 2% |
66 | DONDERIS Katherine | - | 2% | 10% | 25% | 34% | 23% | 6% |
67 | LEE Kaitlin | - | 2% | 11% | 26% | 33% | 21% | 5% |
68 | BANGALORE Shriya | 7% | 26% | 35% | 23% | 8% | 1% | - |
69 | WEINSTEIN Hannah | 1% | 9% | 29% | 38% | 18% | 4% | - |
70 | COOVADIA Malina | 1% | 6% | 20% | 32% | 27% | 11% | 2% |
71 | DESAUTELS Alexandra | 1% | 8% | 26% | 35% | 22% | 6% | 1% |
72 | BARCZAY Sara E. | - | 2% | 13% | 34% | 34% | 15% | 2% |
73 | DANTULURI Shivani | 2% | 14% | 32% | 33% | 15% | 3% | |
74 | IREGUI Sofia | 2% | 15% | 37% | 33% | 12% | 2% | |
75 | LIM Eunice | 5% | 24% | 35% | 25% | 9% | 2% | - |
76 | HUSS Miriam | - | 2% | 15% | 36% | 35% | 11% | 1% |
77 | PHAN Genevieve | 1% | 6% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 7% | 1% |
78 | BARBORIAK Emily | 1% | 8% | 24% | 34% | 24% | 8% | 1% |
79 | ERPELDING Emily | 3% | 16% | 32% | 30% | 15% | 3% | - |
80 | BIESIADA Sophia | 5% | 21% | 33% | 27% | 11% | 2% | - |
81 | BANDHU Saahiti | - | 1% | 11% | 30% | 36% | 19% | 3% |
82 | STONE Coral | - | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 42% | 25% |
83 | KONZEN Iris | 5% | 22% | 34% | 26% | 10% | 2% | - |
84 | HARRISON Allie | 35% | 41% | 19% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
85 | SOBERY Lillian | 1% | 7% | 26% | 37% | 23% | 5% | - |
86 | MEFFORD Isadora | 13% | 38% | 35% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
87 | PATIL Jyothi | 9% | 28% | 35% | 21% | 6% | 1% | - |
88 | DEMARIA Lauren | 1% | 8% | 25% | 33% | 23% | 8% | 1% |
89 | SEELIG Samantha | 1% | 8% | 24% | 34% | 24% | 8% | 1% |
90 | TESTROET Aubrey | - | - | 3% | 14% | 31% | 35% | 16% |
90 | TAMARO Allie | 3% | 21% | 39% | 28% | 9% | 1% | - |
92 | SCHOON REBECCA | - | 3% | 13% | 28% | 33% | 19% | 4% |
93 | KIM Alice | 15% | 34% | 32% | 15% | 4% | 1% | - |
94 | MUTHAPPAN Sahana | 2% | 11% | 27% | 32% | 21% | 7% | 1% |
95 | FORTNER Violet | 10% | 37% | 36% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
96 | JAJRA Avni | 17% | 36% | 31% | 13% | 3% | - | - |
97 | XIAO Sophia | 9% | 28% | 34% | 21% | 7% | 1% | - |
98 | WAY Samantha | - | - | 2% | 11% | 31% | 39% | 17% |
99 | MILLER SACKMAN Anita | 7% | 24% | 34% | 25% | 10% | 2% | - |
100 | KAZA Aditi | 35% | 41% | 19% | 4% | - | - | |
101 | CHIU Philippa | 25% | 45% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - | |
102 | ZHANG Erica | 1% | 6% | 21% | 33% | 27% | 11% | 2% |
103 | YAO Reeva | - | 4% | 17% | 32% | 31% | 13% | 2% |
104 | MARTIN Audrey | 41% | 43% | 14% | 2% | - | - | - |
104 | HENRY Erin | 2% | 17% | 37% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - |
106 | LOTURCO Akiko | 1% | 8% | 28% | 38% | 21% | 4% | - |
107 | MUKHERJEE Moupriya | 7% | 25% | 34% | 23% | 9% | 2% | - |
108 | JUDE Simona | 5% | 21% | 34% | 27% | 11% | 2% | - |
109 | JAGROO Mary | 2% | 23% | 38% | 26% | 9% | 1% | - |
110 | XIE Shirley | 4% | 31% | 41% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
111 | WU Chloe | 21% | 42% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
112 | MADDEN Chloe | 67% | 28% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
113 | CARNES Meghan | 4% | 19% | 34% | 29% | 12% | 2% | - |
114 | MILLER Sophia | - | 5% | 18% | 32% | 29% | 13% | 2% |
115 | REESE Rebecca M. | 5% | 28% | 39% | 21% | 5% | 1% | - |
116 | WOLVERTON Emma | 55% | 36% | 8% | 1% | - | - | - |
117 | CAI Veronica | 2% | 12% | 31% | 35% | 17% | 3% | |
118 | SETHRE Traci | 1% | 9% | 25% | 34% | 23% | 7% | 1% |
118 | GAMEZ Jennifer | 3% | 18% | 33% | 30% | 13% | 3% | - |
120 | PERRY Madelyn | 28% | 45% | 22% | 4% | - | - | |
121 | WELCH Greta | 73% | 24% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
121 | LYNCH Vivian | 41% | 42% | 14% | 2% | - | - | - |
123 | TERP Lucy | 22% | 39% | 27% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
123 | MALVESTUTO Prudence | 59% | 33% | 8% | 1% | - | - | - |
123 | MOROAICA Nsheka | 23% | 42% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
126 | HICKS Corlis | 43% | 41% | 14% | 2% | - | - | - |
126 | HOAGLAND Simone | 24% | 40% | 26% | 9% | 2% | - | - |
126 | FAGAN Cara | 23% | 42% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
129 | MCCAWLEY Madeleine | 80% | 18% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
130 | RAJAGOPALAN Dhanya | 12% | 37% | 34% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
131 | ALEXANDER Leigh | 1% | 13% | 43% | 33% | 9% | 1% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.