Baird Center - Milwaukee, WI, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | WEI Levana | - | 6% | 30% | 48% | 15% | ||
| 2 | FAN Tina | - | - | - | 3% | 19% | 43% | 34% |
| 3 | SHI Maxine | - | - | 2% | 9% | 26% | 39% | 24% |
| 3 | DANIELS Jordanna | - | - | 2% | 16% | 42% | 40% | |
| 5 | CHENG Anna | - | - | 3% | 17% | 41% | 38% | |
| 6 | QIU Abigail | - | 5% | 22% | 37% | 28% | 7% | |
| 7 | CORD Sophia | - | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 42% | 28% |
| 8 | TRAN Esme | 1% | 9% | 25% | 34% | 23% | 7% | 1% |
| 9 | HWANG Sophie | - | - | - | 1% | 8% | 37% | 54% |
| 10 | LUC Christabel | - | 1% | 6% | 21% | 36% | 29% | 8% |
| 11 | SARATH Sana | - | - | - | 4% | 19% | 43% | 34% |
| 12 | MALUKI Nia | - | - | 2% | 9% | 27% | 40% | 22% |
| 13 | ZHOU Carolyn | - | 3% | 12% | 28% | 34% | 20% | 4% |
| 14 | PORTNOY Elizabeth | 3% | 16% | 32% | 31% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 15 | XU Isabella | 1% | 9% | 27% | 37% | 22% | 4% | |
| 16 | RADELL Zoe | 1% | 10% | 28% | 35% | 21% | 5% | - |
| 17 | HU Emily | - | 1% | 5% | 19% | 35% | 31% | 10% |
| 18 | GUERVILLE Angelique | - | 8% | 31% | 39% | 18% | 3% | |
| 19 | TAN Angela | 4% | 20% | 36% | 29% | 10% | 1% | |
| 20 | YU Sydney | 2% | 11% | 27% | 33% | 21% | 6% | 1% |
| 21 | CHEN Chloe | - | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 43% | 18% |
| 22 | ROBBINS Lydia | 2% | 17% | 38% | 31% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 23 | LEE Sophia | 3% | 16% | 33% | 31% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 24 | BREWSTER Ayaki | - | 4% | 19% | 37% | 31% | 9% | |
| 25 | MENON Maya | - | 1% | 10% | 29% | 40% | 20% | |
| 26 | KABILING Anika Von Marie | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 42% | 28% | |
| 27 | GAO Anita | - | 2% | 12% | 32% | 36% | 16% | 2% |
| 28 | WANG April | - | 3% | 13% | 30% | 33% | 18% | 3% |
| 29 | ARANGO Ivanna | 7% | 26% | 37% | 23% | 6% | 1% | |
| 30 | YAO Elizabeth | - | 6% | 24% | 38% | 25% | 6% | - |
| 31 | KONDE Anika | - | 3% | 13% | 30% | 34% | 17% | 3% |
| 32 | LI Gloria | 8% | 32% | 37% | 18% | 4% | - | |
| 33 | TSIPORUKHA Arie | - | - | 3% | 14% | 33% | 37% | 13% |
| 34 | LAMTAN Trinity | - | - | 2% | 12% | 34% | 39% | 14% |
| 35 | MACHIRAJU Ishita | - | - | 1% | 8% | 25% | 41% | 25% |
| 36 | CHAN Clara Minna | 3% | 23% | 47% | 23% | 3% | ||
| 37 | JIN Eileen | 2% | 12% | 31% | 35% | 17% | 3% | |
| 38 | GUO YUKI | - | 4% | 19% | 36% | 31% | 9% | |
| 39 | ATA Emily | - | 4% | 20% | 37% | 29% | 9% | 1% |
| 40 | OH Joanna | 3% | 17% | 33% | 31% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 41 | KU Sophie Grace | 1% | 7% | 24% | 35% | 24% | 7% | 1% |
| 42 | ZHOU kelsey | 8% | 27% | 35% | 22% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 43 | CHANG Kora | - | - | 3% | 15% | 37% | 37% | 9% |
| 44 | CHANG Grace | - | 2% | 13% | 33% | 36% | 15% | 2% |
| 45 | VARAH Alaia | - | 1% | 8% | 38% | 53% | ||
| 46 | KONG Hermione | - | 2% | 15% | 38% | 35% | 10% | |
| 47 | FISCHER Luna | 5% | 22% | 35% | 26% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 48 | BEAL Cameron | 1% | 7% | 21% | 33% | 27% | 11% | 2% |
| 49 | LIU Anya | 11% | 32% | 35% | 17% | 4% | - | |
| 49 | WINSLOW Zaria | - | 7% | 29% | 40% | 21% | 3% | |
| 51 | HONG Eden | 3% | 19% | 36% | 30% | 11% | 1% | |
| 52 | ONG Katherine | 2% | 14% | 33% | 34% | 15% | 2% | |
| 53 | HAN yujie | 39% | 46% | 14% | 1% | - | ||
| 54 | ALLENBACH Madeline | 3% | 15% | 31% | 31% | 16% | 4% | - |
| 55 | ZHOU Charlotte | 12% | 36% | 34% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
| 56 | VU Claire | 3% | 15% | 32% | 31% | 15% | 4% | - |
| 57 | CHANG Jillian | 19% | 38% | 29% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 58 | PURITZ Morgan | 14% | 34% | 32% | 15% | 4% | 1% | - |
| 59 | CERVERA Zoe | 30% | 42% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 60 | ZHAO Audrey | 34% | 42% | 19% | 4% | - | - | |
| 61 | AVDEEV Katherine | 24% | 48% | 24% | 4% | - | ||
| 62 | LIU Kaylee | 3% | 20% | 38% | 28% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 63 | SARBU Esme | 6% | 24% | 35% | 25% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 64 | SHIH Cayla | 32% | 41% | 20% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
| 65 | EDUSA Nayelli | 11% | 36% | 36% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
| 66 | CHANG Eleanor | 4% | 20% | 37% | 29% | 10% | 1% | |
| 68 | POTDAR Harper | 13% | 46% | 32% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 69 | NARAYAN Riya | 12% | 38% | 35% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 70 | RUBANOVA Aleksandra | - | 5% | 20% | 35% | 29% | 10% | 1% |
| 71 | PRAKASH Lithika | 7% | 25% | 35% | 24% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 72 | LEE Kady Hayen | 5% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 73 | WANG ZOE | 32% | 43% | 21% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 74 | LEOU Eliana | 14% | 36% | 33% | 14% | 3% | - | |
| 75 | ZHANG Ellie | 2% | 12% | 29% | 34% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 76 | WU Jing | 4% | 17% | 32% | 29% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 76 | SHANG Skye | 41% | 42% | 14% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 78 | GOSAVI Amiya | 59% | 35% | 6% | - | - | - | |
| 79 | RAZIANO Wallie | 41% | 42% | 15% | 2% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.