Modern Duelists Fencing Academy - Elkton, MD, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | GUNDUBOGULA Saket | V V V V D V | V V V V V | 3.9 | 5 | +1.1 |
| 2 | SERAFIN Ben | V V V V V V | V V V V D | 5.6 | 6 | +0.4 |
| 3 | TIRRELL Justin J. | V V D V V V | V V V D | 5.6 | 5 | -0.6 |
| 3 | GLOGOWSKI Konrad | V V V V V V | V V V D | 5.3 | 6 | +0.7 |
| 5 | O'DOWD Andrew J. | V V V V V V | V V D | 5.2 | 6 | +0.8 |
| 6 | TATE William Isom | D V V V V V | V V D | 5.6 | 5 | -0.6 |
| 7 | KAPLAN Maddox | D V V V V V | V V D | 4.3 | 5 | +0.7 |
| 8 | GAMBINO Robert A. | V V V V D | V V D | 4.6 | 4 | -0.6 |
| 9 | GOVOROV Alexander | V V V V V D | V D | 4.3 | 5 | +0.7 |
| 10 | KIM Zac | V V V V V D | V D | 3.6 | 5 | +1.4 |
| 11 | CZACHOROWSKI Mark | V D V D V V | V D | 2.5 | 4 | +1.5 |
| 12 | DOLBOW Trevor | V D V D V V | V D | 4.1 | 4 | -0.1 |
| 13 | SOKALSKI Edwin | D V D V V V | V D | 3.2 | 4 | +0.8 |
| 14 | LENAR David | D V V D V V | V D | 3.1 | 4 | +0.9 |
| 15 | KARASICK Andrew | V D V D V D | V D | 3.4 | 3 | -0.4 |
| 16 | VANDINGSTEE Keith | V V D D V D | V D | 4.1 | 3 | -1.1 |
| 17 | LUM-DEBONO Adam | V V V D V | D | 3.0 | 4 | +1.0 |
| 18 | CHAWLA Aarav | V V D V D V | D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
| 19 | BERGMANN Beatrix | D V V V D V | D | 2.8 | 4 | +1.2 |
| 20 | TRAN Alex | V D D V V | D | 2.0 | 3 | +1.0 |
| 21 | SCHROPPE Henry | V D D V V D | D | 2.6 | 3 | +0.4 |
| 22 | MURPHY Megan | V V D D V D | D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
| 23 | SHIN Jamie | V D V D D V | D | 1.9 | 3 | +1.1 |
| 24 | BOWIE Charlotta | D V D V D | V D | 1.1 | 2 | +0.9 |
| 25 | STARKWEATHER Jeff | V D D V D D | V D | 4.2 | 2 | -2.2 |
| 26 | MAGUIRE Timothy | V V D D D D | V D | 3.0 | 2 | -1.0 |
| 27 | STOUT Zachary | D D V V D D | V D | 2.4 | 2 | -0.4 |
| 28 | FAN Yonghua | D V D D D V | V D | 1.5 | 2 | +0.5 |
| 29 | DARLING Giles | D V D D D V | V D | 3.2 | 2 | -1.2 |
| 30 | SIMS Martin L. | D D V D V D | V D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
| 31 | ZHANG Jason | D D D D V | V D | 3.4 | 1 | -2.4 |
| 32 | YU Kenneth | D D V D D D | V D | 2.2 | 1 | -1.2 |
| 33 | GRIETZER Elizabeth | D D V D D V | D | 1.0 | 2 | +1.0 |
| 34 | LOPATIN Sergei | D D V D D | D | 0.9 | 1 | +0.1 |
| 35 | WOHNER Kenneth S. | D V D D D D | D | 2.6 | 1 | -1.6 |
| 36 | FONS Jennifer | D D D D V D | D | 0.8 | 1 | +0.2 |
| 37 | DEXTER Danny | D D D V D D | D | 0.6 | 1 | +0.4 |
| 38 | FONS Amandine | D D D D D D | D | 0.8 | 0 | -0.8 |
| 39 | ALPERS Brian | D D D D D D | D | 1.3 | 0 | -1.3 |
| 40 | WEIRICH Mackenzie | D D D D D D | D | 1.1 | 0 | -1.1 |
| 41 | PARIKH Rowan | D D D D D D | D | 0.7 | 0 | -0.7 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.