Modern Duelists Fencing Academy - Elkton, MD, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | GUNDUBOGULA Saket | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 38% | 25% | 3% |
| 2 | SERAFIN Ben | - | - | - | - | 4% | 29% | 67% |
| 3 | TIRRELL Justin J. | - | - | - | - | 4% | 27% | 68% |
| 3 | GLOGOWSKI Konrad | - | - | - | 1% | 12% | 40% | 47% |
| 5 | O'DOWD Andrew J. | - | - | - | 1% | 11% | 54% | 34% |
| 6 | TATE William Isom | - | - | - | - | 5% | 31% | 64% |
| 7 | KAPLAN Maddox | - | - | 2% | 15% | 42% | 36% | 6% |
| 8 | GAMBINO Robert A. | - | - | - | 5% | 29% | 66% | |
| 9 | GOVOROV Alexander | - | - | 1% | 13% | 45% | 36% | 6% |
| 10 | KIM Zac | - | 1% | 11% | 33% | 37% | 16% | 2% |
| 11 | CZACHOROWSKI Mark | 2% | 15% | 34% | 33% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 12 | DOLBOW Trevor | - | - | 5% | 21% | 38% | 29% | 6% |
| 13 | SOKALSKI Edwin | - | 4% | 19% | 38% | 31% | 7% | - |
| 14 | LENAR David | 1% | 6% | 22% | 35% | 26% | 8% | 1% |
| 15 | KARASICK Andrew | - | 1% | 17% | 39% | 32% | 10% | 1% |
| 16 | VANDINGSTEE Keith | - | - | 3% | 19% | 43% | 30% | 4% |
| 17 | LUM-DEBONO Adam | - | 5% | 24% | 43% | 25% | 3% | |
| 18 | CHAWLA Aarav | - | 2% | 13% | 31% | 36% | 17% | 1% |
| 19 | BERGMANN Beatrix | 1% | 11% | 28% | 35% | 20% | 5% | - |
| 20 | TRAN Alex | 4% | 26% | 42% | 23% | 4% | - | |
| 21 | SCHROPPE Henry | 2% | 13% | 31% | 33% | 17% | 4% | - |
| 22 | MURPHY Megan | 1% | 9% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 5% | - |
| 23 | SHIN Jamie | 6% | 28% | 42% | 20% | 3% | - | - |
| 24 | BOWIE Charlotta | 24% | 44% | 27% | 5% | - | - | |
| 25 | STARKWEATHER Jeff | - | - | 4% | 18% | 37% | 32% | 9% |
| 26 | MAGUIRE Timothy | - | 3% | 23% | 47% | 23% | 4% | - |
| 27 | STOUT Zachary | 2% | 16% | 37% | 33% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 28 | FAN Yonghua | 15% | 38% | 33% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 29 | DARLING Giles | - | 2% | 21% | 40% | 28% | 8% | 1% |
| 30 | SIMS Martin L. | 4% | 23% | 39% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 31 | ZHANG Jason | - | 1% | 12% | 42% | 40% | 5% | |
| 32 | YU Kenneth | 4% | 21% | 36% | 27% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 33 | GRIETZER Elizabeth | 33% | 42% | 20% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 34 | LOPATIN Sergei | 29% | 53% | 17% | 2% | - | - | |
| 35 | WOHNER Kenneth S. | 2% | 13% | 31% | 33% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 36 | FONS Jennifer | 38% | 45% | 15% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 37 | DEXTER Danny | 46% | 46% | 7% | - | - | - | - |
| 38 | FONS Amandine | 37% | 53% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 39 | ALPERS Brian | 21% | 41% | 28% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 40 | WEIRICH Mackenzie | 22% | 50% | 25% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 41 | PARIKH Rowan | 48% | 38% | 12% | 2% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.