Southern Connecticut State University (James Moore Fieldhouse) - New Haven, CT, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | WESER Veronica U. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 57% |
| 2 | WILLIAMSON Beatrix | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 40% | 10% |
| 3 | YOUN Kylie | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 52% | 20% | 3% |
| 3 | XU Mulan | 100% | 96% | 78% | 46% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 5 | WANG Sophie Y. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 51% |
| 6 | MARCHANT Morgan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 64% | 20% | |
| 7 | LAW Mila | 100% | 99% | 89% | 62% | 29% | 7% | 1% |
| 8 | BRODEUR Andrea | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 58% | 25% | 5% |
| 9 | BARMAN Willa | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 72% | 38% | 9% |
| 10 | BOWIE Charlotta | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 76% | 21% |
| 11 | ZUCKER Emily A. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 55% | 22% | 4% |
| 12 | CHERNOBRIVETS Maria | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 46% | 14% | 2% |
| 13 | ZHENG Erin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 60% | 20% |
| 14 | JU Jennifer | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 36% | 9% | 1% |
| 15 | HALL Henrietta | 100% | 96% | 77% | 41% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 16 | VENKATESAN Harshitha | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 54% | 16% |
| 17 | TRAN Helena | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 61% |
| 18 | XIAO Katelyn | 100% | 100% | 98% | 79% | 37% | 6% | - |
| 19 | WU Madisen | 100% | 90% | 55% | 19% | 3% | - | - |
| 20 | CHEN Alina | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 73% | 39% | 10% |
| 21 | YOUN Emily | 100% | 98% | 86% | 56% | 22% | 4% | - |
| 22 | SCHLIEP Anna J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 41% | 7% |
| 23 | HSU Catherine | 100% | 85% | 51% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
| 24 | MILLER Cassandra | 100% | 100% | 93% | 59% | 18% | 2% | - |
| 25 | GARCIA Aly | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 64% | 29% | 6% |
| 26 | WROBEL Julia | 100% | 98% | 87% | 61% | 28% | 7% | 1% |
| 27 | PETRIZZO Anna | 100% | 97% | 78% | 42% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 28 | ZHENG Kristen | 100% | 96% | 76% | 41% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 29 | SHETH Anayaà | 100% | 98% | 86% | 56% | 24% | 6% | 1% |
| 30 | SONG Charlotte | 100% | 95% | 74% | 40% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 31 | WALMSLEY Rowan | 100% | 93% | 70% | 36% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 32 | BUES Caelan | 100% | 71% | 19% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 33 | FOMINA Polina | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 90% | 64% | 25% |
| 34 | DUNNE Jessica | 100% | 98% | 83% | 47% | 13% | 1% | |
| 35 | JENSEN MJ | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 70% | 27% | |
| 36 | STEPTOE Cass | 100% | 55% | 16% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 37 | MONGI Holly L. | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 40% | 13% | 2% |
| 38 | DIBENEDETTI Isabella | 100% | 53% | 13% | 2% | - | - | |
| 39 | MASTRONARDI Laura | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 33% | 5% |
| 40 | DIOH Nicole | 100% | 77% | 35% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 41 | ORDORICA Abra | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 38% | 8% |
| 42 | POYNTON Cora | 100% | 100% | 97% | 75% | 33% | 5% | - |
| 43 | YANAGIDA Coco | 100% | 91% | 60% | 24% | 5% | - | - |
| 44 | SIZER Courtney | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 40% | 13% | 2% |
| 45 | CUFF Addison | 100% | 74% | 32% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 46 | HAMMONDS Carissa | 100% | 98% | 85% | 49% | 15% | 2% | |
| 47 | CROWDER Julia | 100% | 92% | 59% | 21% | 3% | - | |
| 48 | FRANKEL Abigail | 100% | 79% | 40% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 49 | WHEELER Michele L. | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 38% | 12% | 2% |
| 50 | MONITTO Malina | 100% | 100% | 94% | 71% | 33% | 7% | - |
| 51 | LAU Karina | 100% | 95% | 71% | 35% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 52 | REED Juliya | 100% | 91% | 62% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 53 | ALVAREZ Letizia | 100% | 94% | 71% | 37% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 54 | WESTERFELD Zoey | 100% | 52% | 8% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 55 | BRANDON Em | 100% | 98% | 76% | 33% | 6% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.