Southern Connecticut State University (James Moore Fieldhouse) - New Haven, CT, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | ATKINS Benjamin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 53% | 17% |
| 2 | WHEELER Daniel | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 80% | 36% |
| 3 | PRIHODKO Andrew | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 86% | 56% | 17% |
| 3 | LAWLOR Lee | 100% | 97% | 80% | 47% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 5 | ZUCKER Noah L. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 60% | 14% |
| 6 | BUSH Thomas | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 36% | 9% | 1% |
| 7 | YAKIMENKO Andrei | 100% | 99% | 92% | 70% | 34% | 7% | |
| 8 | GERSEN Jacob | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 32% | 5% |
| 9 | BELLIVEAU Shane | 100% | 98% | 83% | 52% | 20% | 4% | < 1% |
| 10 | STEWART Robert | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 60% | 17% |
| 11 | COETZEE Frans M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 37% | 6% |
| 12 | PHO Eric | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 54% |
| 13 | CHENG Thomas | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 83% | 51% | 15% |
| 14 | HARRIS Robert S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 60% | 20% |
| 15 | FIEDERLEIN Andrew M. | 100% | 96% | 77% | 43% | 13% | 2% | |
| 16 | HUGHES Michael D. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 47% | 12% |
| 17 | SPRINGER Michael | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 75% | 33% |
| 18 | ELBAG Mark H. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 51% | 15% | |
| 19 | LIU Kun | 100% | 95% | 75% | 41% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 20 | VIEDERMAN Matthew (Matt) | 100% | 97% | 79% | 45% | 15% | 2% | |
| 21 | MCDONNELL Michael | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 38% | 7% |
| 22 | FROLICH Grant | 100% | 92% | 66% | 32% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 23 | CHOI Paul S. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 64% | 30% | 6% |
| 24 | HARRELL D. Fox | 100% | 98% | 84% | 52% | 19% | 3% | |
| 25 | NEMAZIE David A. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 45% | 14% | 2% |
| 26 | RUGGLES William R. | 100% | 98% | 88% | 61% | 26% | 6% | - |
| 27 | CHU Brandon A. | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 36% | 10% | 1% |
| 28 | ZHANG Qing | 100% | 74% | 33% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 29 | WU Robert | 100% | 88% | 52% | 16% | 2% | - | - |
| 30 | DREYER Matthew W. | 100% | 96% | 77% | 43% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 31 | WALTING Paul J. | 100% | 99% | 90% | 65% | 31% | 8% | 1% |
| 32 | ANDERSON Eric | 100% | 82% | 43% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 33 | WARD Carrington R. | 100% | 96% | 73% | 34% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 34 | HEKMAT Sina R. | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 38% | 11% | 1% |
| 35 | TARDIFF Seth | 100% | 73% | 21% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 36 | GAO "George" Xiaojiang | 100% | 99% | 89% | 50% | 13% | 1% | - |
| 37 | LESINSKI Jason J. | 100% | 86% | 51% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
| 38 | LEE Kevin | 100% | 94% | 73% | 40% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 39 | ROMERO Javier | 100% | 100% | 94% | 67% | 29% | 6% | - |
| 40 | PARTE Aidan | 100% | 97% | 81% | 50% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 41 | HANSEL Roy | 100% | 77% | 38% | 11% | 2% | - | |
| 42 | MILES Ronald D. | 100% | 98% | 84% | 50% | 16% | 2% | - |
| 43 | CUFF Joe | 100% | 52% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 44 | O'BRIEN Timothy S. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 65% | 22% | 3% | - |
| 45 | LUNIEVICZ Joseph P. | 100% | 93% | 68% | 32% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 46 | BERDICHEVSKY Steven | 100% | 96% | 72% | 34% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 47 | PIERRO Roger | 100% | 98% | 86% | 56% | 23% | 5% | - |
| 48 | LONADIER Robert | 100% | 21% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.