Southern Connecticut State University (James Moore Fieldhouse) - New Haven, CT, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | WANG Dina C. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 29% | |
| 2 | HAFEZ Tahiyah | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 52% |
| 3 | LAZAR Carolina | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 53% | 18% | 2% |
| 3 | CHEN Sophie | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 57% | 17% | |
| 5 | ZELDIN Nadia | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 35% |
| 6 | BASILE Gianna | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 71% | 28% | |
| 7 | BADLANI Diya | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 30% | 6% |
| 9 | JIANG Chloe | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 26% |
| 10 | ROBERTS Anastasia | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 60% | 14% |
| 11 | CHEN Jephanie Y. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 24% | |
| 12 | PANNONE Elisa | 100% | 99% | 85% | 51% | 16% | 2% | |
| 13 | COLE Sofia | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 40% | 11% | 1% |
| 14 | LIU Yinuo | 100% | 100% | 100% | 93% | 68% | 29% | 5% |
| 15 | SONG Jenna | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 28% |
| 16 | GREENLEAF Ella | 100% | 99% | 88% | 57% | 20% | 3% | |
| 17 | HUSSIAN Annabelle | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 61% | 25% | 4% |
| 18 | LIN Katherine | 100% | 100% | 100% | 92% | 65% | 27% | 4% |
| 19 | LI Christina | 100% | 100% | 97% | 72% | 33% | 8% | 1% |
| 20 | HUANG Sophie | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 47% | 11% |
| 21 | NICUDEMUS Bryella | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 32% | 8% | 1% |
| 22 | KATS Ekaterina | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 47% | 16% | 2% |
| 23 | CHOI Cara | 100% | 99% | 91% | 63% | 26% | 4% | - |
| 24 | YUAN Agnes | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 60% | 23% | 3% |
| 25 | YANIV Liya | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 54% | 20% | 3% |
| 26 | MEYER Claudia | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 72% | 29% |
| 27 | POWLEDGE Cora | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 49% | 13% | |
| 28 | POLING Katherine | 100% | 98% | 86% | 54% | 19% | 3% | |
| 29 | PUOPOLO Mia | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 56% | 16% | |
| 30 | KIM Claire | 100% | 99% | 92% | 65% | 28% | 5% | - |
| 31 | LAVINE Samantha | 100% | 94% | 67% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 32 | VACCARO Lillian | 100% | 82% | 42% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 33 | BAULIN Zoya | 100% | 98% | 82% | 48% | 15% | 2% | |
| 34 | OTTAVIANO Maris | 100% | 81% | 42% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 35 | CHRISTENSEN Nora | 100% | 98% | 88% | 59% | 25% | 6% | 1% |
| 36 | SHAH Mahi | 100% | 95% | 68% | 29% | 6% | - | |
| 37 | DEEKEN Anna | 100% | 99% | 91% | 63% | 25% | 4% | - |
| 38 | JUNCADELLA Lucy | 100% | 81% | 41% | 11% | 2% | - | |
| 39 | ZINITI-LAU Elena | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 35% | 10% | 1% |
| 40 | QI Annabelle | 100% | 88% | 52% | 17% | 3% | - | |
| 41 | ZHOU Sophia | 100% | 95% | 71% | 33% | 7% | 1% | |
| 42 | SNYDERS Evelyn | 100% | 98% | 81% | 44% | 12% | 1% | |
| 43 | MAIA ZUCKERMAN Julia | 100% | 74% | 31% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 44 | JIANG Doris | 100% | 49% | 11% | 1% | - | - | |
| 45 | WALMSLEY Rowan | 100% | 95% | 69% | 31% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 46 | PEPE Natalia | 100% | 82% | 42% | 12% | 2% | - | |
| 47 | ERSHOVA Anastasia | 100% | 93% | 64% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 47 | LOPES Julia | 100% | 92% | 58% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
| 49 | LENZ Phoebe | 100% | 62% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 50 | SONG Sarah | 100% | 50% | 12% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 51 | POPOVA Polina | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 47% | 16% | 2% |
| 52 | BENADOUDA Ines | 100% | 64% | 21% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 53 | MCCORMICK Ella | 100% | 45% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 54 | ALDREDGE Ginny Rebecca | 100% | 55% | 8% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.