Southern Connecticut State University (James Moore Fieldhouse) - New Haven, CT, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | HOU Gaven | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 33% | 7% |
| 3 | DAVIDSON Elliot | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 59% |
| 3 | URIBE GOMEZ Sebastian Javier | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 72% |
| 5 | DEEB Adam | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 41% |
| 6 | LIU Aaron | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 71% | 28% |
| 7 | ABRAMKIN Tim | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 45% | 11% | |
| 8 | SMITH Grant D. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 93% | 58% | ||
| 9 | PLUMMER Waylon | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 25% | 3% |
| 10 | CHA James | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 54% | 16% | |
| 11 | HAN Alexander | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 61% | 19% | |
| 12 | FROST Chayse | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 32% | 4% |
| 13 | LEE Thomas | 100% | 99% | 87% | 50% | 14% | 2% | |
| 14 | ZHAO Ryan | 100% | 98% | 84% | 51% | 18% | 2% | |
| 15 | GECKELER James | 100% | 89% | 56% | 21% | 4% | - | |
| 16 | COFFIN Carleton | 100% | 98% | 84% | 51% | 18% | 3% | |
| 17 | FERENCZ Alexander J. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 40% | 9% | |
| 18 | TOOMRE Kai | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 30% | 6% |
| 19 | PAN Ethan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 73% | 39% | 10% |
| 20 | BAI Austin | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 66% | 23% | |
| 21 | XU Nathan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 25% | 3% |
| 22 | YANG Dylan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 57% | 18% | |
| 23 | ZHANG GAVIN J | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 35% | 7% | |
| 24 | PECK Quinn | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 31% | 6% | |
| 25 | XU Ryan | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 28% | 6% | - |
| 26 | GORLOVITZKI Amitai | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 49% | 15% | 1% |
| 27 | KROLEWSKI Alexander | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 31% | 6% | |
| 28 | SUSANTO William | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 58% | 24% | 4% |
| 29 | KIM Aiden | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 40% | 11% | 1% |
| 30 | CZARNECKI Thomas | 100% | 100% | 93% | 70% | 36% | 11% | 1% |
| 31 | JEFF Ariff | 100% | 92% | 61% | 25% | 5% | - | |
| 32 | QUAN Noah | 100% | 88% | 55% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
| 33 | LEE Charles T | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 52% | 15% | |
| 34 | MUNDAHL Brandon | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 49% | 13% | |
| 35 | POLLIO Benjamin | 100% | 96% | 74% | 34% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 36 | ZHANG Julian | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 38% | 10% | 1% |
| 37 | NIECHWADOWICZ Michael | 100% | 99% | 84% | 43% | 7% | ||
| 38 | CHOI Hunter | 100% | 99% | 89% | 62% | 27% | 5% | - |
| 39 | REN Ryan | 100% | 97% | 75% | 37% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 41 | DIAZ Gabriel | 100% | 98% | 79% | 44% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 42 | ULYSSE Jacob | 100% | 96% | 72% | 33% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 43 | ESPINAL Ryan | 100% | 78% | 37% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 44 | XU Brian | 100% | 87% | 53% | 19% | 4% | - | |
| 45 | PEREZ Logan | 100% | 94% | 57% | 16% | 1% | ||
| 46 | FALCONE Jack | 100% | 95% | 68% | 29% | 6% | 1% | |
| 47 | STAFFORD Gareth | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 35% | 7% | |
| 48 | DAO-CRESPO Joaquin | 100% | 95% | 70% | 32% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 49 | THOMAS Liam | 100% | 100% | 94% | 74% | 40% | 13% | 2% |
| 50 | AMRANI David | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 63% | 27% | 5% |
| 51 | DAWSON Myer | 100% | 65% | 22% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 52 | CHENG Thomas | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 69% | 20% |
| 53 | ZAPPALA Nikolai | 100% | 100% | 95% | 71% | 30% | 5% | |
| 54 | MCCALL Aidan | 100% | 93% | 63% | 25% | 5% | - | |
| 55 | GRANADOS Luis | 100% | 98% | 76% | 31% | 4% | ||
| 56 | TIBBETTS Justin | 100% | 99% | 88% | 58% | 23% | 4% | |
| 57 | MURPHY Damian J. | 100% | 94% | 70% | 33% | 8% | 1% | |
| 58 | AYYAGARI Abhiram | 100% | 96% | 59% | 18% | 3% | - | |
| 59 | BERETICH Brian | 100% | 96% | 73% | 33% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 60 | EZEKIEL Nathan | 100% | 97% | 77% | 40% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 61 | ABDELGAWAD Abdelrahman | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 36% | |
| 61 | ARSHAD Mohsin | 100% | 82% | 41% | 12% | 2% | - | |
| 63 | BOURNE Zane | 100% | 45% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 64 | BERNARD Jonathan | 100% | 59% | 17% | 2% | - | - | |
| 65 | HU Daniel | 100% | 94% | 70% | 35% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 66 | SHAMBARGER Graham | 100% | 67% | 25% | 5% | - | - | |
| 67 | HIMELFARB Charlie | 100% | 34% | 5% | - | - | ||
| 68 | HOWARD Mekai | 100% | 19% | 1% | - | - | - | |
| 69 | LIU jeremy | 100% | 91% | 63% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 70 | SINCAVAGE Louis | 100% | 56% | 15% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 71 | MANCHALA Vedanth | 100% | 38% | 7% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 72 | DINIO Clara J. | 100% | 98% | 77% | 33% | 7% | 1% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.