Southern Connecticut State University (James Moore Fieldhouse) - New Haven, CT, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | ZHAO Royce | V V V V V V | V V V V V | 4.6 | 6 | +1.4 |
| 2 | VEDRE Neil | D D V D V V | V V V V V D | 4.1 | 3 | -1.1 |
| 3 | CRAWFORD William | V V D D V V | V V V V D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
| 3 | LAZARTE Gabriel | V V V V V V | V V V D | 3.2 | 6 | +2.8 |
| 5 | ZWAKA Jonas | V D V V V | V V V D | 3.2 | 4 | +0.8 |
| 6 | ROSADO Sebastian | V V V V D V | V V V D | 3.7 | 5 | +1.3 |
| 7 | WOLMART Zander | V V V V D | V V V D | 2.0 | 4 | +2.0 |
| 8 | WONG Caleb W. | D D V V V | V V V D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
| 9 | LIM Brandon | V V V V V V | V D | 4.7 | 6 | +1.3 |
| 10 | BELAND Riley James "RJ" | V V V D V V | V V D | 3.4 | 5 | +1.6 |
| 11 | LEVY Jack | V V V D D V | V V D | 4.5 | 4 | -0.5 |
| 12 | CHENG Brandon | D D V V V V | V V D | 4.3 | 4 | -0.3 |
| 13 | MIAO Heqi | V D V D V D | V V D | 3.6 | 3 | -0.6 |
| 14 | HELD Lev | V D V D D V | V V D | 2.0 | 3 | +1.0 |
| 15 | JARAMILLO Juan | V D V D D D | V V D | 2.7 | 2 | -0.7 |
| 16 | GUPTA Arav | D D V V D D | V V D | 1.8 | 2 | +0.2 |
| 17 | WASCO Andrew | V V V V V V | D | 4.7 | 6 | +1.3 |
| 18 | WITCZAK Mateus | V V D V V V | D | 4.7 | 5 | +0.3 |
| 19 | ZHANG Simon | V V V V D V | D | 2.9 | 5 | +2.1 |
| 20 | NIEBERGALL Jaxson | V V D V V V | D | 2.7 | 5 | +2.3 |
| 21 | ORIE Sohan | V V V D V V | D | 2.1 | 5 | +2.9 |
| 22 | LORENZ Evan | D V V V V V | V D | 4.0 | 5 | +1.0 |
| 23 | SWIFT Owen | V V V D V V | V D | 4.4 | 5 | +0.6 |
| 24 | ABDELLAHI Aziz | V D V V V D | D | 5.0 | 4 | -1.0 |
| 25 | ZONG Yujie | V V V V D D | V D | 4.2 | 4 | -0.2 |
| 26 | BHASKAR Dhananjay K. | D V V V D V | V D | 4.7 | 4 | -0.7 |
| 27 | RIDKY Sam | V V D V D | V D | 3.4 | 3 | -0.4 |
| 28 | LIU Eric | D V V V D V | V D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
| 29 | DAI Zihou | V D D V V V | V D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
| 30 | MARTINEZ Luke | V D V V D D | V D | 1.4 | 3 | +1.6 |
| 31 | LEE Damian | V V D V D D | V D | 2.6 | 3 | +0.4 |
| 32 | JAIDEVA Aakash | V V D D D V | V D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
| 33 | WEISS Toby | D V D V V D | D | 3.4 | 3 | -0.4 |
| 34 | JAGANNATHAN Ajay | D V D D V V | D | 2.7 | 3 | +0.3 |
| 35 | CONG Mason | D V D V V D | D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
| 36 | LABRADOR RODRIGUEZ Emanuel | D D V V D V | D | 3.6 | 3 | -0.6 |
| 37 | COBITZ Harrison | D D V V D D | D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
| 38 | DZIALO George A. | D D D V D | D | 2.5 | 1 | -1.5 |
| 39 | BENNETT Lachlan | D D D V D V | D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
| 40 | MCCAFFREY Timothy | D V D V D D | D | 2.8 | 2 | -0.8 |
| 41 | WANG Theodore | V D D V D D | D | 3.4 | 2 | -1.4 |
| 42 | MARSHQUIST Miles | D V D D V D | D | 0.8 | 2 | +1.2 |
| 43 | HAUSLER Jayden | D D D D V V | D | 3.2 | 2 | -1.2 |
| 44 | KRAYTMAN Matthew | D D D D D V | D | 1.9 | 1 | -0.9 |
| 45 | CHIEN Nolan | V D D D D D | D | 2.4 | 1 | -1.4 |
| 46 | SOMANI Aarav | V D D D D D | D | 0.8 | 1 | +0.2 |
| 47 | MERCURE Edward (Tony) | D D D D V D | D | 2.3 | 1 | -1.3 |
| 49 | SONG Ryan | D D D D V D | D | 2.1 | 1 | -1.1 |
| 50 | LOSQUADRO Joseph | D D D D D D | D | 2.8 | 0 | -2.8 |
| 51 | ZHANG David | D D D D D D | D | 1.9 | 0 | -1.9 |
| 52 | MENZIES Liam | D D D D D D | D | 1.7 | 0 | -1.7 |
| 52 | KOCKELMAN Zeno | D D D D D D | D | 2.6 | 0 | -2.6 |
| 54 | MUKHERJEE Aryan | D D D D D D | D | 0.7 | 0 | -0.7 |
| 55 | BERGHAUSER Zachary | D D D D D D | D | 0.7 | 0 | -0.7 |
| 56 | BARAKAT Bailey | D D D D D | D | 0.6 | 0 | -0.6 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.