Ontario Convention Center - Ontario, CA, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
# | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
1 | CHANG Jonathan | V V V V V V | V V V V V | 4.4 | 6 | +1.6 |
2 | CHEN Matthew | V V V V V V | V V V V V D | 5.2 | 6 | +0.8 |
3 | KIM Daniel Y. | V V V V V | V V V V D | 4.3 | 5 | +0.7 |
3 | ZHOU Chenqiao | V V V V V | V V V V D | 3.8 | 5 | +1.2 |
5 | KRYLTSOV Michael | V V V V V V | V V V D | 5.1 | 6 | +0.9 |
6 | CHALUT Etienne | D V V V V V | V V V D | 5.2 | 5 | -0.2 |
7 | CHEN Charlie Tian-You | V V V D V V | V V V D | 4.8 | 5 | +0.2 |
8 | LEE Jaden | V V V D D | V V V V D | 2.7 | 3 | +0.3 |
9 | ZHOU Shawn | D V V V V V | V V D | 3.2 | 5 | +1.8 |
10 | QIU Zhaocheng | V V V V D V | V V D | 4.2 | 5 | +0.8 |
11 | NGUYEN Martin | V V D V V V | V V | 4.6 | 5 | +0.4 |
12 | LOZANO Veyron Jericho | V V V V V D | V V D | 4.8 | 5 | +0.2 |
13 | PARK Sky | V D V V V V | V V D | 4.9 | 5 | +0.1 |
14 | CHOI Ethan | V V V V D | V V D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
15 | WANG Elijah (QiChen) | V V D D V | V V V D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
16 | KUNTSEVICH Ivan I. | V D D D D V | V V V D | 2.6 | 2 | -0.6 |
17 | WANG Michael | V V V V D V | V D | 3.9 | 5 | +1.1 |
18 | ZHANG Aaron | V V V D V V | V D | 5.0 | 5 | - |
19 | PARK Steve (Sangmin) | D V V V V | V D | 3.3 | 4 | +0.7 |
20 | COSTE Fabien | V V D V V D | V D | 4.4 | 4 | -0.4 |
21 | LI Edison M. | D V V V D V | V D | 4.1 | 4 | -0.1 |
22 | YI William W. | V V D D V V | V D | 5.2 | 4 | -1.2 |
23 | LIU William | D D V V V V | V D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
24 | SISINNI Leonardo | D V V D V V | V D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
25 | DINSAY Kristjan | D V V V V D | V D | 5.0 | 4 | -1.0 |
26 | PARK Rion | D V V D V V | V V D | 4.7 | 4 | -0.7 |
27 | WONG Evan | D V V V V D | V V D | 3.3 | 4 | +0.7 |
28 | YANG Charles | V D V V D | V V D | 2.2 | 3 | +0.8 |
29 | KIM Jonah | D V V D V D | V V D | 3.3 | 3 | -0.3 |
30 | MARTIN IV Elmer D. | D V D V D V | V V D | 4.8 | 3 | -1.8 |
30 | PE Noah | V D V D D V | V V D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
32 | PINCHENG Yao | V V D D D V | V V D | 3.9 | 3 | -0.9 |
33 | NAVARRO Kato | V V V V V V | D | 3.8 | 6 | +2.2 |
34 | HUANG Jonathan | V V V V V D | D | 4.1 | 5 | +0.9 |
35 | RODRIGUEZ Tyler | V V D V V V | D | 3.7 | 5 | +1.3 |
36 | YU ShiYu (Henry) | V V V V D V | D | 2.8 | 5 | +2.2 |
37 | SUMIN Yang | V V V V V D | D | 2.0 | 5 | +3.0 |
38 | LEE Christopher T. | V D V V V | D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
39 | MORROW Brenden | V V V D V | D | 3.3 | 4 | +0.7 |
40 | ANDRADE Cedric | V V D V D V | D | 1.8 | 4 | +2.2 |
41 | TSOI Spencer | V V D D V V | D | 2.6 | 4 | +1.4 |
42 | WONG Braxton | D V V V D V | D | 2.7 | 4 | +1.3 |
43 | KIM Aiden | D V V D V V | D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
44 | BIELER Mason | D V V V D V | D | 3.3 | 4 | +0.7 |
45 | DERRICK Blake | V V D D V V | V D | 5.0 | 4 | -1.0 |
46 | ZHONG Maxwell | V D V V V D | V D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
47 | GORDON William L. | D V V V V D | V D | 3.1 | 4 | +0.9 |
48 | BAE Eugene | V V V D D | V D | 3.8 | 3 | -0.8 |
49 | ZHAN Kevin | D D V V V | V D | 2.2 | 3 | +0.8 |
50 | ZHOU Ryan | D V V V D | V D | 3.3 | 3 | -0.3 |
51 | LI Daniel | V D D V V | V D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
52 | ZHANG Jacob | D D V V V D | V D | 4.3 | 3 | -1.3 |
53 | PARK William | D D V D V V | V D | 3.4 | 3 | -0.4 |
54 | CHANG Nathan | D V V V D D | V D | 2.7 | 3 | +0.3 |
54 | CAJERO Luis O. | D D V V V D | V D | 1.7 | 3 | +1.3 |
56 | ONG Nicholas | D V V D D | V D | 2.9 | 2 | -0.9 |
57 | ROZALSKI Eli | D V D D V | V D | 3.9 | 2 | -1.9 |
58 | LEPAROUX Jean | V D V D D D | V D | 3.5 | 2 | -1.5 |
59 | HERNANDEZ BERRON Salvador | D D V D V D | V D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
60 | CHANG Eric Jonathan | V V D D D D | V D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
61 | LI Lucas | V D D D V D | V D | 3.1 | 2 | -1.1 |
62 | ZHANG Andrew | D D D D V | V D | 0.7 | 1 | +0.3 |
63 | LEONG Wilson Hua | V D D D D | V D | 0.8 | 1 | +0.2 |
64 | YUE Jackson | D D D D V D | V D | 2.6 | 1 | -1.6 |
65 | BI Ryan | V D D V V | D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
66 | AGARWAL Savya | D V D D V | D | 1.4 | 2 | +0.6 |
67 | BORG Matthew | V D D V D D | D | 3.3 | 2 | -1.3 |
68 | SEIGEL Duncan | D D V D D V | D | 2.3 | 2 | -0.3 |
69 | GUDIMETLA Siddhanth | D V D D V D | D | 1.6 | 2 | +0.4 |
70 | TRUJILLO Jonah | D V D D D V | D | 0.9 | 2 | +1.1 |
71 | FLANAGAN Miles | V D D D D V | D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
72 | ORNELAS Matteo | D D D V D | D | 1.7 | 1 | -0.7 |
73 | SCHIENEMAN Valentine | D D D V D | D | 2.3 | 1 | -1.3 |
74 | CHOI Colin | D V D D D D | D | 3.1 | 1 | -2.1 |
75 | FOY Grant | D D D V D D | D | 1.8 | 1 | -0.8 |
75 | CHEN kenneth | D D V D D D | D | 1.2 | 1 | -0.2 |
77 | HUANG Nathan | D D D D V D | D | 1.5 | 1 | -0.5 |
78 | ZHANG Jayden | D D D V D D | D | 2.3 | 1 | -1.3 |
79 | PETROV Mikhail | D D D V D D | D | 2.3 | 1 | -1.3 |
80 | NISHIHIRA Tyler | D V D D D D | D | 2.0 | 1 | -1.0 |
80 | XU Ryan | D D D D D V | D | 1.1 | 1 | -0.1 |
82 | GUO Joey | V D D D D D | D | 1.2 | 1 | -0.2 |
83 | BURLINGAME Owen | V D D D D D | D | 1.1 | 1 | -0.1 |
84 | KARPMAN Benny | D D V D D D | D | 1.0 | 1 | - |
85 | WEI Winston | D D D D D V | D | 1.7 | 1 | -0.7 |
86 | POUND Michael | D D D D D D | D | 1.1 | 0 | -1.1 |
87 | LI Jake | D D D D D D | D | 0.5 | 0 | -0.5 |
88 | DACKO Nolan | D D D D D | D | 0.7 | 0 | -0.7 |
89 | YEE Colin | D D D D D D | D | 2.2 | 0 | -2.2 |
90 | MAO Runxian | D D D D D D | D | 0.9 | 0 | -0.9 |
91 | WILLIAMS Matthew | D D D D D | D | 0.3 | 0 | -0.3 |
92 | LEE Christopher | D D D D D | D | 0.7 | 0 | -0.7 |
93 | ZIEGLER Everisto | D D D D D D | D | 0.6 | 0 | -0.6 |
94 | NGUYEN Ethan | D D D D D D | D | 0.2 | 0 | -0.2 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
---|---|---|---|
Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.