Ontario Convention Center - Ontario, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | CHANG Jonathan | - | - | 2% | 13% | 39% | 36% | 10% |
2 | CHEN Matthew | - | - | - | 2% | 16% | 43% | 39% |
3 | KIM Daniel Y. | - | - | 2% | 13% | 41% | 44% | |
3 | ZHOU Chenqiao | - | 1% | 7% | 28% | 43% | 21% | |
5 | KRYLTSOV Michael | - | - | - | 3% | 17% | 45% | 35% |
6 | CHALUT Etienne | - | - | - | 3% | 16% | 44% | 38% |
7 | CHEN Charlie Tian-You | - | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 44% | 23% |
8 | LEE Jaden | 1% | 10% | 31% | 38% | 18% | 3% | |
9 | ZHOU Shawn | 1% | 6% | 21% | 35% | 28% | 9% | 1% |
10 | QIU Zhaocheng | - | - | 4% | 19% | 40% | 30% | 7% |
11 | NGUYEN Martin | - | - | 2% | 10% | 31% | 40% | 17% |
12 | LOZANO Veyron Jericho | - | - | 1% | 6% | 26% | 45% | 22% |
13 | PARK Sky | - | - | - | 4% | 25% | 45% | 25% |
14 | CHOI Ethan | - | - | 5% | 24% | 46% | 25% | |
15 | WANG Elijah (QiChen) | - | 7% | 27% | 38% | 22% | 4% | |
16 | KUNTSEVICH Ivan I. | 1% | 12% | 32% | 35% | 16% | 3% | - |
17 | WANG Michael | - | 1% | 8% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 5% |
18 | ZHANG Aaron | - | - | 1% | 5% | 22% | 42% | 30% |
19 | PARK Steve (Sangmin) | - | 2% | 17% | 41% | 33% | 7% | |
20 | COSTE Fabien | - | - | 3% | 14% | 33% | 37% | 13% |
21 | LI Edison M. | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 36% | 27% | 8% |
22 | YI William W. | - | - | - | 3% | 15% | 41% | 42% |
23 | LIU William | - | 1% | 9% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 4% |
24 | SISINNI Leonardo | - | 4% | 16% | 32% | 32% | 14% | 2% |
25 | DINSAY Kristjan | - | - | - | 4% | 19% | 45% | 32% |
26 | PARK Rion | - | - | 1% | 9% | 30% | 43% | 17% |
27 | WONG Evan | - | 5% | 19% | 35% | 29% | 11% | 1% |
28 | YANG Charles | 3% | 20% | 39% | 29% | 9% | 1% | |
29 | KIM Jonah | - | 4% | 19% | 35% | 29% | 11% | 2% |
30 | MARTIN IV Elmer D. | - | - | - | 6% | 28% | 44% | 21% |
30 | PE Noah | 1% | 13% | 38% | 34% | 12% | 2% | - |
32 | PINCHENG Yao | - | 1% | 8% | 25% | 36% | 25% | 6% |
33 | NAVARRO Kato | - | 2% | 10% | 28% | 37% | 21% | 3% |
34 | HUANG Jonathan | - | 1% | 6% | 20% | 36% | 30% | 8% |
35 | RODRIGUEZ Tyler | - | 2% | 12% | 30% | 34% | 18% | 4% |
36 | YU ShiYu (Henry) | - | 9% | 30% | 37% | 19% | 4% | - |
37 | SUMIN Yang | 4% | 27% | 39% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - |
38 | LEE Christopher T. | - | 3% | 15% | 34% | 35% | 13% | |
39 | MORROW Brenden | - | 2% | 16% | 39% | 34% | 9% | |
40 | ANDRADE Cedric | 7% | 34% | 39% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
41 | TSOI Spencer | 1% | 12% | 34% | 35% | 15% | 3% | - |
42 | WONG Braxton | 1% | 11% | 29% | 35% | 19% | 5% | - |
43 | KIM Aiden | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 37% | 27% | 6% |
44 | BIELER Mason | - | 3% | 17% | 36% | 32% | 11% | 1% |
45 | DERRICK Blake | - | - | 1% | 5% | 21% | 42% | 32% |
46 | ZHONG Maxwell | - | 1% | 7% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 7% |
47 | GORDON William L. | 1% | 7% | 22% | 35% | 26% | 8% | 1% |
48 | BAE Eugene | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 42% | 24% | |
49 | ZHAN Kevin | 2% | 21% | 39% | 28% | 9% | 1% | |
50 | ZHOU Ryan | - | 3% | 18% | 37% | 32% | 10% | |
51 | LI Daniel | 1% | 14% | 35% | 34% | 14% | 2% | |
52 | ZHANG Jacob | - | - | 2% | 15% | 38% | 35% | 9% |
53 | PARK William | - | 3% | 16% | 36% | 33% | 11% | 1% |
54 | CHANG Nathan | 1% | 10% | 31% | 39% | 17% | 3% | - |
54 | CAJERO Luis O. | 12% | 34% | 34% | 16% | 4% | - | - |
56 | ONG Nicholas | - | 4% | 27% | 42% | 23% | 3% | |
57 | ROZALSKI Eli | - | 1% | 6% | 25% | 43% | 25% | |
58 | LEPAROUX Jean | - | 3% | 15% | 31% | 33% | 16% | 3% |
59 | HERNANDEZ BERRON Salvador | 6% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - |
60 | CHANG Eric Jonathan | 7% | 28% | 37% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - |
61 | LI Lucas | - | 4% | 23% | 40% | 25% | 6% | - |
62 | ZHANG Andrew | 45% | 40% | 13% | 2% | - | - | |
63 | LEONG Wilson Hua | 33% | 51% | 15% | 2% | - | - | |
64 | YUE Jackson | 1% | 12% | 32% | 36% | 17% | 3% | - |
65 | BI Ryan | - | 4% | 25% | 42% | 25% | 4% | |
66 | AGARWAL Savya | 15% | 44% | 31% | 9% | 1% | - | |
67 | BORG Matthew | - | 4% | 19% | 36% | 31% | 10% | 1% |
68 | SEIGEL Duncan | 2% | 19% | 39% | 30% | 9% | 1% | - |
69 | GUDIMETLA Siddhanth | 12% | 37% | 36% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
70 | TRUJILLO Jonah | 33% | 48% | 17% | 2% | - | - | - |
71 | FLANAGAN Miles | 8% | 28% | 36% | 21% | 6% | 1% | - |
72 | ORNELAS Matteo | 8% | 34% | 38% | 17% | 3% | - | |
73 | SCHIENEMAN Valentine | 1% | 15% | 42% | 31% | 9% | 1% | |
74 | CHOI Colin | - | 6% | 23% | 38% | 26% | 7% | 1% |
75 | FOY Grant | 9% | 31% | 36% | 19% | 5% | 1% | - |
75 | CHEN kenneth | 24% | 41% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
77 | HUANG Nathan | 14% | 39% | 35% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
78 | ZHANG Jayden | 1% | 20% | 39% | 29% | 10% | 1% | - |
79 | PETROV Mikhail | 3% | 19% | 36% | 29% | 11% | 2% | - |
80 | NISHIHIRA Tyler | 7% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 7% | 1% | - |
80 | XU Ryan | 27% | 46% | 22% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
82 | GUO Joey | 23% | 43% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
83 | BURLINGAME Owen | 26% | 42% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
84 | KARPMAN Benny | 31% | 45% | 20% | 4% | - | - | - |
85 | WEI Winston | 12% | 33% | 34% | 17% | 4% | - | - |
86 | POUND Michael | 30% | 42% | 22% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
87 | LI Jake | 58% | 34% | 7% | 1% | - | - | - |
88 | DACKO Nolan | 44% | 46% | 9% | 1% | - | - | |
89 | YEE Colin | 4% | 21% | 36% | 28% | 10% | 2% | - |
90 | MAO Runxian | 33% | 48% | 17% | 2% | - | - | - |
91 | WILLIAMS Matthew | 75% | 22% | 3% | - | - | - | |
92 | LEE Christopher | 45% | 41% | 12% | 1% | - | - | |
93 | ZIEGLER Everisto | 53% | 37% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
94 | NGUYEN Ethan | 80% | 19% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.