Fortune ROC/RJCC/RYC

Junior Men's Foil

Saturday, August 30, 2025 at 8:00 AM

Ontario Convention Center - Ontario, CA, USA

Probability density of pool victories

Reset

Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.

# Name Number of victories
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
1 CHANG Jonathan - - 2% 13% 39% 36% 10%
2 CHEN Matthew - - - 2% 16% 43% 39%
3 KIM Daniel Y. - - 2% 13% 41% 44%
3 ZHOU Chenqiao - 1% 7% 28% 43% 21%
5 KRYLTSOV Michael - - - 3% 17% 45% 35%
6 CHALUT Etienne - - - 3% 16% 44% 38%
7 CHEN Charlie Tian-You - - 1% 7% 26% 44% 23%
8 LEE Jaden 1% 10% 31% 38% 18% 3%
9 ZHOU Shawn 1% 6% 21% 35% 28% 9% 1%
10 QIU Zhaocheng - - 4% 19% 40% 30% 7%
11 NGUYEN Martin - - 2% 10% 31% 40% 17%
12 LOZANO Veyron Jericho - - 1% 6% 26% 45% 22%
13 PARK Sky - - - 4% 25% 45% 25%
14 CHOI Ethan - - 5% 24% 46% 25%
15 WANG Elijah (QiChen) - 7% 27% 38% 22% 4%
16 KUNTSEVICH Ivan I. 1% 12% 32% 35% 16% 3% -
17 WANG Michael - 1% 8% 25% 37% 24% 5%
18 ZHANG Aaron - - 1% 5% 22% 42% 30%
19 PARK Steve (Sangmin) - 2% 17% 41% 33% 7%
20 COSTE Fabien - - 3% 14% 33% 37% 13%
21 LI Edison M. - 1% 6% 22% 36% 27% 8%
22 YI William W. - - - 3% 15% 41% 42%
23 LIU William - 1% 9% 27% 36% 22% 4%
24 SISINNI Leonardo - 4% 16% 32% 32% 14% 2%
25 DINSAY Kristjan - - - 4% 19% 45% 32%
26 PARK Rion - - 1% 9% 30% 43% 17%
27 WONG Evan - 5% 19% 35% 29% 11% 1%
28 YANG Charles 3% 20% 39% 29% 9% 1%
29 KIM Jonah - 4% 19% 35% 29% 11% 2%
30 MARTIN IV Elmer D. - - - 6% 28% 44% 21%
30 PE Noah 1% 13% 38% 34% 12% 2% -
32 PINCHENG Yao - 1% 8% 25% 36% 25% 6%
33 NAVARRO Kato - 2% 10% 28% 37% 21% 3%
34 HUANG Jonathan - 1% 6% 20% 36% 30% 8%
35 RODRIGUEZ Tyler - 2% 12% 30% 34% 18% 4%
36 YU ShiYu (Henry) - 9% 30% 37% 19% 4% -
37 SUMIN Yang 4% 27% 39% 23% 6% 1% -
38 LEE Christopher T. - 3% 15% 34% 35% 13%
39 MORROW Brenden - 2% 16% 39% 34% 9%
40 ANDRADE Cedric 7% 34% 39% 17% 3% - -
41 TSOI Spencer 1% 12% 34% 35% 15% 3% -
42 WONG Braxton 1% 11% 29% 35% 19% 5% -
43 KIM Aiden - 1% 6% 22% 37% 27% 6%
44 BIELER Mason - 3% 17% 36% 32% 11% 1%
45 DERRICK Blake - - 1% 5% 21% 42% 32%
46 ZHONG Maxwell - 1% 7% 23% 36% 26% 7%
47 GORDON William L. 1% 7% 22% 35% 26% 8% 1%
48 BAE Eugene - 1% 7% 26% 42% 24%
49 ZHAN Kevin 2% 21% 39% 28% 9% 1%
50 ZHOU Ryan - 3% 18% 37% 32% 10%
51 LI Daniel 1% 14% 35% 34% 14% 2%
52 ZHANG Jacob - - 2% 15% 38% 35% 9%
53 PARK William - 3% 16% 36% 33% 11% 1%
54 CHANG Nathan 1% 10% 31% 39% 17% 3% -
54 CAJERO Luis O. 12% 34% 34% 16% 4% - -
56 ONG Nicholas - 4% 27% 42% 23% 3%
57 ROZALSKI Eli - 1% 6% 25% 43% 25%
58 LEPAROUX Jean - 3% 15% 31% 33% 16% 3%
59 HERNANDEZ BERRON Salvador 6% 25% 37% 24% 7% 1% -
60 CHANG Eric Jonathan 7% 28% 37% 22% 6% 1% -
61 LI Lucas - 4% 23% 40% 25% 6% -
62 ZHANG Andrew 45% 40% 13% 2% - -
63 LEONG Wilson Hua 33% 51% 15% 2% - -
64 YUE Jackson 1% 12% 32% 36% 17% 3% -
65 BI Ryan - 4% 25% 42% 25% 4%
66 AGARWAL Savya 15% 44% 31% 9% 1% -
67 BORG Matthew - 4% 19% 36% 31% 10% 1%
68 SEIGEL Duncan 2% 19% 39% 30% 9% 1% -
69 GUDIMETLA Siddhanth 12% 37% 36% 13% 2% - -
70 TRUJILLO Jonah 33% 48% 17% 2% - - -
71 FLANAGAN Miles 8% 28% 36% 21% 6% 1% -
72 ORNELAS Matteo 8% 34% 38% 17% 3% -
73 SCHIENEMAN Valentine 1% 15% 42% 31% 9% 1%
74 CHOI Colin - 6% 23% 38% 26% 7% 1%
75 FOY Grant 9% 31% 36% 19% 5% 1% -
75 CHEN kenneth 24% 41% 26% 8% 1% - -
77 HUANG Nathan 14% 39% 35% 11% 1% - -
78 ZHANG Jayden 1% 20% 39% 29% 10% 1% -
79 PETROV Mikhail 3% 19% 36% 29% 11% 2% -
80 NISHIHIRA Tyler 7% 27% 36% 22% 7% 1% -
80 XU Ryan 27% 46% 22% 5% 1% - -
82 GUO Joey 23% 43% 27% 6% 1% - -
83 BURLINGAME Owen 26% 42% 25% 7% 1% - -
84 KARPMAN Benny 31% 45% 20% 4% - - -
85 WEI Winston 12% 33% 34% 17% 4% - -
86 POUND Michael 30% 42% 22% 5% 1% - -
87 LI Jake 58% 34% 7% 1% - - -
88 DACKO Nolan 44% 46% 9% 1% - -
89 YEE Colin 4% 21% 36% 28% 10% 2% -
90 MAO Runxian 33% 48% 17% 2% - - -
91 WILLIAMS Matthew 75% 22% 3% - - -
92 LEE Christopher 45% 41% 12% 1% - -
93 ZIEGLER Everisto 53% 37% 9% 1% - - -
94 NGUYEN Ethan 80% 19% 2% - - - -

Explanation

The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:

This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.