Ontario Convention Center - Ontario, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | GACIOCH Noah | - | - | - | 4% | 17% | 41% | 38% |
| 2 | LI Grayson | - | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 42% | 27% |
| 3 | SU Samuel | - | 1% | 10% | 32% | 40% | 17% | |
| 3 | FU Nolan | - | - | 2% | 11% | 31% | 38% | 18% |
| 5 | XUE Michael | - | - | - | 4% | 23% | 52% | 20% |
| 6 | VOO Lucas | - | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 41% | 24% |
| 7 | WONG Aaron | - | 1% | 6% | 21% | 36% | 29% | 7% |
| 8 | SAMIMI Sina | - | 3% | 15% | 32% | 33% | 14% | 2% |
| 9 | ADDLEMAN Joshua | - | - | - | - | 6% | 37% | 57% |
| 10 | RONG Marcus | - | - | - | 3% | 16% | 44% | 38% |
| 11 | PARKE Nathaniel | - | - | - | 2% | 13% | 39% | 46% |
| 12 | LEUNG Dylan | - | 1% | 4% | 16% | 33% | 34% | 13% |
| 13 | CHEN Jayden | - | - | 1% | 6% | 27% | 47% | 20% |
| 14 | BERTEL Florian | - | 1% | 7% | 22% | 36% | 27% | 7% |
| 15 | GUO Luke | - | 1% | 5% | 19% | 36% | 30% | 9% |
| 16 | MOSLEY Wally | - | - | 2% | 10% | 28% | 40% | 21% |
| 17 | DENG haoyu | - | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 41% | 26% |
| 18 | MA Nolan | - | - | 2% | 11% | 32% | 39% | 17% |
| 19 | KROTZ Nicolas | - | 4% | 16% | 32% | 31% | 14% | 2% |
| 20 | DENG Destin | - | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 45% | 21% |
| 21 | KHUSHRAJ Rohan | - | 3% | 14% | 30% | 33% | 17% | 3% |
| 22 | PARRA Lucas | - | 5% | 18% | 33% | 30% | 12% | 1% |
| 23 | LIU Daniel | - | 2% | 12% | 32% | 35% | 16% | 2% |
| 24 | OLIVAS Joseph | 1% | 10% | 25% | 32% | 23% | 8% | 1% |
| 25 | WANG Devin | - | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 41% | 23% |
| 26 | JU Shang | 2% | 12% | 31% | 35% | 17% | 2% | - |
| 27 | GONZÁLEZ Jesús | 3% | 16% | 34% | 32% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 28 | TOYOFUKU Lucas | - | 1% | 8% | 24% | 35% | 24% | 6% |
| 29 | LUO Alvin Y. | 4% | 18% | 33% | 29% | 13% | 3% | - |
| 29 | SCHWARTZMAN Ethan | - | 6% | 22% | 35% | 27% | 10% | 1% |
| 31 | HWANG Matthew | - | 3% | 13% | 27% | 32% | 20% | 5% |
| 32 | DAVIDSON James | 3% | 17% | 34% | 31% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 33 | XIE HanZhang (Elon) | - | 4% | 20% | 39% | 29% | 8% | |
| 34 | DU Evan | - | - | - | 2% | 12% | 38% | 47% |
| 35 | WONG Vansen | 1% | 9% | 27% | 35% | 22% | 6% | 1% |
| 36 | ONG David | - | 2% | 11% | 27% | 34% | 20% | 5% |
| 37 | TAMHANE Sidhant | 9% | 30% | 36% | 19% | 5% | - | - |
| 38 | KOU Mason | 1% | 9% | 25% | 34% | 24% | 7% | 1% |
| 39 | WONG Alexander | 1% | 6% | 20% | 32% | 27% | 12% | 2% |
| 40 | MA Ciel | - | 2% | 12% | 30% | 34% | 17% | 3% |
| 41 | LIU Xuyao | - | 2% | 13% | 32% | 34% | 16% | 3% |
| 42 | LEE Lucas | - | 2% | 9% | 25% | 36% | 23% | 4% |
| 43 | SZETO Zachary | 9% | 32% | 38% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 44 | MILLER Xavier | 1% | 10% | 27% | 36% | 21% | 5% | - |
| 45 | SHOURIE Neel | 3% | 16% | 32% | 31% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 46 | SCHIPPER Johann | 1% | 9% | 33% | 38% | 17% | 3% | |
| 47 | WU Nathan | - | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 41% | 20% |
| 48 | ENG Kyler | - | 1% | 5% | 19% | 36% | 30% | 9% |
| 49 | ZHANG Luqi | - | 2% | 9% | 24% | 33% | 24% | 7% |
| 50 | FU Benjamin | 2% | 12% | 30% | 34% | 18% | 5% | - |
| 51 | LIU Yihong | 4% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 52 | FUNG SCOTT | 13% | 37% | 33% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
| 53 | LI Vance | 3% | 15% | 31% | 31% | 16% | 4% | - |
| 54 | ZHAO Luke | 6% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 55 | SUN Jiarui (Jerry) | 1% | 8% | 23% | 32% | 25% | 10% | 2% |
| 56 | RAHMAN Ali | - | 2% | 11% | 29% | 36% | 19% | 3% |
| 57 | PARADKAR Akshay | 16% | 34% | 31% | 15% | 4% | 1% | - |
| 58 | LIN Daniel | - | 5% | 18% | 33% | 30% | 12% | 1% |
| 59 | FEKETE John | 4% | 19% | 35% | 29% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 60 | FERRIERE Theo | 12% | 32% | 34% | 17% | 4% | 1% | - |
| 61 | WANG Lucas | - | 3% | 14% | 31% | 34% | 16% | 3% |
| 62 | GUO Jonathan | 3% | 15% | 31% | 31% | 16% | 4% | - |
| 63 | SHIH Derek | 6% | 24% | 35% | 25% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 64 | SHOURIE Seth | 4% | 20% | 36% | 28% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 65 | NGUYEN Ethan V. | 2% | 11% | 27% | 33% | 21% | 6% | 1% |
| 66 | NOLAN Morgan | 39% | 42% | 16% | 3% | < 1% | - | - |
| 67 | YU Haoyun | 5% | 21% | 34% | 27% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 68 | ABRAHAM Aaron | 7% | 24% | 34% | 24% | 9% | 2% | - |
| 69 | MAI Sy | 16% | 38% | 32% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 70 | KONG William | 11% | 31% | 34% | 19% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 71 | KIM Daniel | - | 1% | 11% | 32% | 39% | 17% | |
| 72 | WANG Mason | 3% | 14% | 29% | 31% | 17% | 5% | 1% |
| 73 | OR Anson | 20% | 39% | 29% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 74 | CHAN Nathan | 9% | 29% | 35% | 20% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 75 | GUO zhaohong | 11% | 31% | 34% | 18% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 76 | TAVERNA Matteo | 6% | 27% | 38% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 77 | HUNG Ludwig | 63% | 32% | 5% | - | - | - | |
| 78 | YOO Lucas | 2% | 11% | 27% | 33% | 21% | 6% | 1% |
| 79 | TIAN Dylan | 2% | 12% | 29% | 33% | 19% | 5% | - |
| 80 | ZHANG Jenson | 3% | 18% | 33% | 30% | 13% | 3% | - |
| 81 | YE Andrew | 55% | 35% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 82 | BALUCAN Gabriel | 3% | 16% | 33% | 31% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 83 | LI Connor | 22% | 39% | 28% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
| 84 | ZHANG Zhihan | 7% | 30% | 39% | 20% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 84 | YUN Mason | 21% | 39% | 28% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
| 86 | BONTHA Dhruv | 2% | 13% | 31% | 33% | 17% | 4% | - |
| 87 | LIU Aiden | 4% | 19% | 34% | 29% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 88 | RAJPRABHU Pranesh | 20% | 40% | 29% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 89 | GONZALEZ-KUSHNER Elian | 6% | 23% | 35% | 25% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 90 | YUN Nicholas | 4% | 21% | 37% | 28% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 91 | YIM Antonio | 1% | 9% | 31% | 37% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 92 | KIM Christian | 17% | 38% | 31% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 93 | YOON Ian | 10% | 44% | 34% | 11% | 1% | - | |
| 94 | KIM Hayden | 2% | 15% | 33% | 33% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 95 | PARK Sihoon | 21% | 40% | 28% | 9% | 2% | - | - |
| 95 | ZENG Aidrik | 14% | 38% | 33% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 97 | HAN Alex | 1% | 11% | 30% | 36% | 18% | 3% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.