Ontario Convention Center - Ontario, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | GACIOCH Noah | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 38% |
2 | LI Grayson | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 27% |
3 | SU Samuel | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 56% | 17% | |
3 | FU Nolan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 56% | 18% |
5 | XUE Michael | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 72% | 20% |
6 | VOO Lucas | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 24% |
7 | WONG Aaron | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 36% | 7% |
8 | SAMIMI Sina | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 49% | 16% | 2% |
9 | ADDLEMAN Joshua | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 57% |
10 | RONG Marcus | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 38% |
11 | PARKE Nathaniel | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 46% |
12 | LEUNG Dylan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 80% | 47% | 13% |
13 | CHEN Jayden | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 67% | 20% |
14 | BERTEL Florian | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 34% | 7% |
15 | GUO Luke | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 75% | 39% | 9% |
16 | MOSLEY Wally | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 61% | 21% |
17 | DENG haoyu | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 26% |
18 | MA Nolan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 56% | 17% |
19 | KROTZ Nicolas | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 47% | 16% | 2% |
20 | DENG Destin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 21% |
21 | KHUSHRAJ Rohan | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 54% | 21% | 3% |
22 | PARRA Lucas | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 43% | 14% | 1% |
23 | LIU Daniel | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 53% | 18% | 2% |
24 | OLIVAS Joseph | 100% | 99% | 89% | 64% | 32% | 9% | 1% |
25 | WANG Devin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 23% |
26 | JU Shang | 100% | 98% | 86% | 55% | 20% | 3% | - |
27 | GONZÁLEZ Jesús | 100% | 97% | 81% | 47% | 16% | 2% | - |
28 | TOYOFUKU Lucas | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 66% | 31% | 6% |
29 | LUO Alvin Y. | 100% | 96% | 78% | 45% | 16% | 3% | - |
29 | SCHWARTZMAN Ethan | 100% | 100% | 94% | 72% | 37% | 11% | 1% |
31 | HWANG Matthew | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 57% | 24% | 5% |
32 | DAVIDSON James | 100% | 97% | 80% | 46% | 15% | 2% | - |
33 | XIE HanZhang (Elon) | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 37% | 8% | |
34 | DU Evan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 47% |
35 | WONG Vansen | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 29% | 7% | 1% |
36 | ONG David | 100% | 100% | 97% | 86% | 59% | 25% | 5% |
37 | TAMHANE Sidhant | 100% | 91% | 61% | 25% | 5% | 1% | - |
38 | KOU Mason | 100% | 99% | 90% | 66% | 32% | 8% | 1% |
39 | WONG Alexander | 100% | 99% | 93% | 73% | 41% | 14% | 2% |
40 | MA Ciel | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 55% | 21% | 3% |
41 | LIU Xuyao | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 52% | 18% | 3% |
42 | LEE Lucas | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 64% | 28% | 4% |
43 | SZETO Zachary | 100% | 91% | 58% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
44 | MILLER Xavier | 100% | 99% | 89% | 62% | 26% | 5% | - |
45 | SHOURIE Neel | 100% | 97% | 81% | 50% | 18% | 3% | - |
46 | SCHIPPER Johann | 100% | 99% | 91% | 58% | 20% | 3% | |
47 | WU Nathan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 60% | 20% |
48 | ENG Kyler | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 75% | 39% | 9% |
49 | ZHANG Luqi | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 64% | 31% | 7% |
50 | FU Benjamin | 100% | 98% | 87% | 57% | 23% | 5% | - |
51 | LIU Yihong | 100% | 96% | 73% | 36% | 10% | 2% | - |
52 | FUNG SCOTT | 100% | 87% | 50% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
53 | LI Vance | 100% | 97% | 83% | 52% | 20% | 4% | - |
54 | ZHAO Luke | 100% | 94% | 69% | 32% | 7% | 1% | - |
55 | SUN Jiarui (Jerry) | 100% | 99% | 91% | 68% | 36% | 11% | 2% |
56 | RAHMAN Ali | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 58% | 22% | 3% |
57 | PARADKAR Akshay | 100% | 84% | 50% | 19% | 4% | 1% | - |
58 | LIN Daniel | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 44% | 14% | 1% |
59 | FEKETE John | 100% | 96% | 77% | 42% | 13% | 2% | - |
60 | FERRIERE Theo | 100% | 88% | 56% | 22% | 5% | 1% | - |
61 | WANG Lucas | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 52% | 19% | 3% |
62 | GUO Jonathan | 100% | 97% | 83% | 52% | 20% | 4% | - |
63 | SHIH Derek | 100% | 94% | 70% | 35% | 10% | 1% | - |
64 | SHOURIE Seth | 100% | 96% | 76% | 40% | 11% | 1% | - |
65 | NGUYEN Ethan V. | 100% | 98% | 87% | 60% | 27% | 7% | 1% |
66 | NOLAN Morgan | 100% | 61% | 19% | 3% | < 1% | - | - |
67 | YU Haoyun | 100% | 95% | 75% | 41% | 13% | 2% | - |
68 | ABRAHAM Aaron | 100% | 93% | 69% | 35% | 10% | 2% | - |
69 | MAI Sy | 100% | 84% | 46% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
70 | KONG William | 100% | 89% | 58% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - |
71 | KIM Daniel | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 56% | 17% | |
72 | WANG Mason | 100% | 97% | 83% | 53% | 23% | 6% | 1% |
73 | OR Anson | 100% | 80% | 40% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
74 | CHAN Nathan | 100% | 91% | 62% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - |
75 | GUO zhaohong | 100% | 89% | 58% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - |
76 | TAVERNA Matteo | 100% | 94% | 67% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - |
77 | HUNG Ludwig | 100% | 37% | 5% | - | - | - | |
78 | YOO Lucas | 100% | 98% | 88% | 61% | 28% | 7% | 1% |
79 | TIAN Dylan | 100% | 98% | 86% | 57% | 24% | 5% | - |
80 | ZHANG Jenson | 100% | 97% | 79% | 46% | 16% | 3% | - |
81 | YE Andrew | 100% | 45% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
82 | BALUCAN Gabriel | 100% | 97% | 81% | 48% | 17% | 3% | - |
83 | LI Connor | 100% | 78% | 40% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
84 | ZHANG Zhihan | 100% | 93% | 64% | 25% | 5% | 1% | - |
84 | YUN Mason | 100% | 79% | 40% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
86 | BONTHA Dhruv | 100% | 98% | 85% | 55% | 21% | 4% | - |
87 | LIU Aiden | 100% | 96% | 78% | 44% | 15% | 3% | - |
88 | RAJPRABHU Pranesh | 100% | 80% | 40% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
89 | GONZALEZ-KUSHNER Elian | 100% | 94% | 70% | 36% | 11% | 2% | - |
90 | YUN Nicholas | 100% | 96% | 74% | 38% | 10% | 1% | - |
91 | YIM Antonio | 100% | 99% | 90% | 60% | 23% | 4% | - |
92 | KIM Christian | 100% | 83% | 45% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
93 | YOON Ian | 100% | 90% | 46% | 12% | 2% | - | |
94 | KIM Hayden | 100% | 98% | 83% | 50% | 17% | 2% | - |
95 | PARK Sihoon | 100% | 79% | 39% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
95 | ZENG Aidrik | 100% | 86% | 47% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
97 | HAN Alex | 100% | 99% | 88% | 58% | 22% | 3% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.