Ontario Convention Center - Ontario, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | XU Ethan | - | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 41% | 30% |
2 | ALVAREZ Francisco Janusz | - | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 41% | 23% |
3 | WANG Waylon | - | - | 1% | 8% | 29% | 42% | 20% |
3 | WU Gengze (Daniel) | - | - | - | 5% | 30% | 65% | |
5 | YANG Steve | - | - | - | 1% | 9% | 37% | 53% |
6 | AGARWAL Jagrav | - | 2% | 12% | 30% | 35% | 18% | 3% |
7 | EVANS Desmond | - | - | - | - | 3% | 23% | 74% |
8 | LO Enzo | - | - | - | 4% | 21% | 45% | 30% |
9 | SUN Roy | - | - | - | - | 3% | 24% | 72% |
10 | CREMEL Remi | - | - | - | 5% | 22% | 43% | 30% |
11 | MURDOCK Koichi | - | - | 1% | 7% | 28% | 43% | 22% |
12 | CAO Benjamin | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 38% | 26% | 6% |
13 | NGUYEN Norris | - | 2% | 15% | 40% | 35% | 8% | - |
14 | PARK Kaiden | - | - | 2% | 12% | 34% | 38% | 14% |
15 | DING Sam | - | - | 1% | 9% | 30% | 42% | 17% |
16 | LI Aaron | - | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 41% | 24% |
17 | TROYANKER Makar | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 37% | 23% | 5% |
18 | TAN Benjamin | - | - | 4% | 19% | 38% | 31% | 8% |
19 | SHENOY Neil | - | 2% | 13% | 32% | 35% | 15% | 1% |
20 | CHENG Alvin | - | 2% | 10% | 27% | 35% | 21% | 5% |
21 | WANG Theodore | 2% | 14% | 31% | 32% | 17% | 4% | - |
22 | SUN Lucas | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 37% | 28% | 7% |
23 | SCHOR William | 12% | 35% | 35% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
24 | XIE Garrett | 2% | 14% | 33% | 34% | 14% | 2% | - |
25 | VIEN Bradley | - | 4% | 18% | 34% | 30% | 12% | 2% |
26 | MENG Eric | 1% | 7% | 22% | 34% | 26% | 9% | 1% |
27 | ZHANG alex | 1% | 15% | 35% | 33% | 14% | 2% | - |
28 | LIN Dylan | 1% | 8% | 27% | 37% | 21% | 5% | - |
29 | MA Justin | 1% | 6% | 20% | 33% | 28% | 11% | 2% |
30 | DONG YIKUN | 4% | 19% | 35% | 29% | 11% | 2% | - |
31 | HO Cameron | - | 3% | 16% | 35% | 33% | 12% | 1% |
32 | KIM Liam | - | 2% | 15% | 42% | 34% | 6% | - |
33 | XU Daniel | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 41% | 22% | 2% |
34 | ZHANG Charlie | 1% | 8% | 27% | 39% | 23% | 3% | |
35 | WANG Eason | - | - | 3% | 17% | 37% | 33% | 10% |
36 | LIU Aiden | - | - | 4% | 21% | 39% | 29% | 7% |
37 | LI Lief | - | 2% | 9% | 25% | 35% | 23% | 6% |
38 | LIN Sampson | - | 1% | 10% | 30% | 39% | 18% | 1% |
39 | GOLDSTEIN Benjamin | - | 3% | 14% | 33% | 35% | 15% | 1% |
39 | CHOI William | 1% | 7% | 21% | 33% | 27% | 10% | 1% |
41 | HUANG Owen | - | - | 2% | 10% | 28% | 39% | 21% |
42 | BHANGOO Arman | 4% | 25% | 40% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - |
43 | LOZANO Koen Alexander | - | 3% | 13% | 29% | 33% | 18% | 3% |
44 | CHEN Ian | 20% | 40% | 30% | 10% | 1% | - | |
45 | LEE Juneau | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 40% | 22% | 2% |
46 | BHOOMI Abhiram | 2% | 21% | 41% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - |
47 | RAJ Yojith | - | 4% | 20% | 39% | 28% | 8% | 1% |
48 | LIN Stewart | 5% | 24% | 38% | 26% | 7% | - | |
49 | GOYAL Arie | 1% | 12% | 41% | 33% | 11% | 2% | - |
50 | LITVACK Jackson | 5% | 21% | 35% | 27% | 11% | 2% | - |
51 | WANG Andy | 20% | 42% | 28% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
52 | GU Evan | - | 4% | 20% | 38% | 29% | 8% | 1% |
53 | WONG Kingston | 16% | 42% | 32% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
54 | ZHANG Bryant | 24% | 41% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
55 | XU Benjamin | 13% | 34% | 33% | 16% | 4% | - | - |
56 | BRADY Theodore | 3% | 16% | 32% | 31% | 15% | 3% | - |
57 | BAGWELL Theodore | 2% | 13% | 34% | 33% | 15% | 3% | - |
58 | FUNG Caleb | 5% | 24% | 38% | 26% | 7% | - | |
59 | CUI Heng Rui | 18% | 40% | 30% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
60 | SPICER-YOUAKIM Benjamin | 12% | 33% | 34% | 17% | 4% | 1% | - |
61 | ZENG Cayden | 3% | 18% | 33% | 29% | 13% | 3% | - |
62 | ZUO Thomas | 27% | 42% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
63 | ZHOU Milo | 3% | 18% | 36% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - |
64 | WEST Kai | 5% | 22% | 37% | 27% | 8% | - | |
65 | ANDERSON Stellan | 21% | 50% | 24% | 4% | - | - | - |
66 | TOTH Leland | - | - | 2% | 10% | 30% | 39% | 18% |
67 | WU Kangdi | 10% | 35% | 38% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
68 | STOCK Ian | 42% | 42% | 14% | 2% | - | - | - |
69 | LUO Derren | 58% | 34% | 7% | 1% | - | - | - |
70 | KIM Noah | 39% | 45% | 15% | 2% | - | - | - |
71 | FUNG Lucas | 12% | 36% | 35% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
72 | PARK Bryant | 5% | 24% | 38% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - |
73 | TELFORD Kristopher | - | 2% | 14% | 35% | 34% | 13% | 2% |
74 | SHELDON Mai | < 1% | 5% | 28% | 42% | 21% | 4% | - |
75 | THAO Zenji | 30% | 45% | 21% | 4% | - | - | - |
75 | SASOMSUP Kaison | 2% | 16% | 36% | 31% | 12% | 2% | - |
77 | PHILLIPS Julian | 19% | 40% | 29% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
77 | ZHANG Yuen | 6% | 32% | 41% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
79 | PENG Max | 49% | 41% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
79 | LU David | < 1% | 4% | 25% | 39% | 24% | 6% | 1% |
81 | LIU Kingston | 29% | 41% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
81 | DANGELO Logan | < 1% | - | - | 4% | 27% | 57% | 12% |
81 | RUDENKO Zhdan | 26% | 42% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.