Ontario Convention Center - Ontario, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | GORDON William L. | - | - | 2% | 13% | 39% | 39% | 7% |
2 | CHOI Ethan | - | - | 2% | 13% | 32% | 37% | 16% |
3 | WILLIAMS Dean | - | - | - | - | 6% | 32% | 62% |
3 | SUMIN Yang | - | 3% | 13% | 30% | 33% | 18% | 3% |
5 | FLANAGAN Miles | - | 2% | 9% | 24% | 34% | 24% | 7% |
6 | DENG David | - | 2% | 11% | 26% | 34% | 22% | 5% |
7 | BHANOT Arjun | 1% | 7% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 6% | |
8 | ZHAN Kevin | - | 1% | 8% | 29% | 40% | 20% | 3% |
9 | BI Ryan | - | - | - | 1% | 10% | 36% | 53% |
10 | NISHIHIRA Tyler | - | 1% | 15% | 42% | 34% | 8% | |
11 | KIM Jonah | - | - | 4% | 26% | 46% | 23% | |
12 | SU Desmond | - | 5% | 21% | 37% | 29% | 8% | |
13 | UYPECKCUAT Maximillian Trajan | - | 1% | 10% | 30% | 40% | 19% | |
14 | ANDRADE Cedric | - | 3% | 14% | 32% | 34% | 15% | 2% |
15 | SU Preston | 2% | 13% | 28% | 31% | 19% | 6% | 1% |
16 | LEE Christopher | 1% | 6% | 22% | 35% | 26% | 9% | 1% |
17 | AGARWAL Savya | - | 5% | 22% | 36% | 27% | 9% | 1% |
18 | PONTOPPIDAN Erik | 1% | 8% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 6% | |
18 | CHANG Nathan | - | 1% | 9% | 30% | 41% | 19% | |
20 | ZHANG Jayden | - | 3% | 14% | 32% | 33% | 16% | 3% |
21 | KARPMAN Benny | - | 5% | 19% | 34% | 29% | 11% | 1% |
22 | XU Ryan | 2% | 17% | 40% | 31% | 9% | 1% | - |
23 | MANIKTALA Suvir | 1% | 7% | 24% | 38% | 25% | 6% | |
24 | LAMBRECHT Julius | - | - | 4% | 24% | 45% | 26% | |
25 | ARCARA Evan | 9% | 33% | 36% | 17% | 4% | - | - |
26 | LEONG Wilson Hua | 6% | 26% | 38% | 23% | 6% | 1% | |
27 | DANIEL Nikith | 6% | 27% | 38% | 23% | 6% | 1% | |
28 | CAJERO Luis O. | - | 1% | 9% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 6% |
29 | ALCAZAREN Cian | 5% | 22% | 35% | 26% | 10% | 2% | - |
30 | ZHANG Andrew | - | 8% | 44% | 37% | 11% | 1% | |
31 | WILLIAMS Matthew | 21% | 47% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
32 | DULAI Angad | 19% | 41% | 29% | 9% | 1% | - | |
33 | BURLINGAME Owen | - | 6% | 22% | 36% | 26% | 8% | 1% |
34 | DOUGLASS Liam | - | 4% | 17% | 35% | 32% | 11% | |
35 | NGUYEN Nolan | 54% | 42% | 4% | - | - | - | |
36 | LI Austin | 17% | 39% | 31% | 11% | 2% | - | |
37 | POUND Michael | - | 5% | 24% | 41% | 24% | 5% | - |
38 | CHEUNG Henry | 49% | 40% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
39 | TRUJILLO Jonah | 4% | 18% | 33% | 29% | 13% | 3% | - |
40 | JORDON Karl | - | 1% | 10% | 28% | 36% | 21% | 5% |
41 | DULAI Agam | 13% | 40% | 33% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
42 | FARRELL Samuel | 3% | 18% | 34% | 30% | 13% | 3% | - |
43 | NGUYEN Ethan | 32% | 56% | 12% | 1% | - | - | |
44 | LEE Colin | 45% | 39% | 13% | 2% | - | - | |
45 | ZIEGLER Everisto | 37% | 44% | 17% | 2% | - | - | - |
46 | JEREZ PINE Luca | 36% | 42% | 18% | 4% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.