Ontario Convention Center - Ontario, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | WANG James | - | 1% | 8% | 24% | 37% | 24% | 5% |
| 2 | LOPEZ Mateo | - | 3% | 16% | 37% | 34% | 10% | |
| 3 | LUO Gavin | - | - | 4% | 18% | 36% | 32% | 10% |
| 3 | LVOVSKIY Roman | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 42% | 23% | |
| 5 | SU Eric | - | - | 2% | 13% | 32% | 37% | 16% |
| 6 | FU BRANDEN | - | - | 1% | 5% | 22% | 42% | 30% |
| 7 | CAO Chong | - | 4% | 17% | 35% | 33% | 11% | |
| 8 | WANG Henrik | - | 2% | 14% | 37% | 36% | 11% | |
| 9 | FAKHRI Adrian | - | - | 3% | 15% | 36% | 35% | 10% |
| 10 | QI Zach | - | - | 4% | 17% | 35% | 32% | 11% |
| 11 | LEI Isaac | 1% | 7% | 22% | 33% | 26% | 10% | 1% |
| 12 | JI Derek | 1% | 6% | 22% | 36% | 27% | 9% | 1% |
| 13 | LEE Kyle Sung Ju | - | 3% | 15% | 35% | 34% | 13% | 1% |
| 14 | DESAI Arthav | - | 2% | 11% | 31% | 39% | 17% | |
| 15 | YE Aaron | - | - | 5% | 25% | 44% | 26% | |
| 16 | ZHANG Hanzhi | 3% | 16% | 35% | 31% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 17 | LEE Jayden | - | - | 3% | 14% | 31% | 35% | 15% |
| 18 | CHEN Aaron | - | - | - | 4% | 19% | 42% | 34% |
| 19 | MOROAICA Seiku | - | - | 1% | 6% | 25% | 42% | 25% |
| 20 | ZHENG Matt | - | 4% | 16% | 34% | 33% | 12% | |
| 21 | CHOI LIAM | - | 1% | 8% | 28% | 42% | 22% | |
| 22 | HSIEH Maxwell | - | - | 4% | 15% | 34% | 35% | 11% |
| 23 | EKAMBARAM Rithik | - | 1% | 8% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 5% |
| 24 | DENG Aurik | 4% | 24% | 41% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 25 | WU Allen | 2% | 13% | 30% | 33% | 17% | 4% | - |
| 26 | WONG Alexander | - | 1% | 7% | 21% | 34% | 28% | 9% |
| 27 | YOON Jacob | 11% | 33% | 36% | 17% | 4% | - | |
| 28 | RAZAI Evan | - | - | 4% | 19% | 37% | 32% | 8% |
| 29 | DENG Richard | - | 2% | 15% | 36% | 35% | 11% | |
| 30 | RAMAKRISHNA Arjun | 1% | 11% | 35% | 36% | 14% | 2% | |
| 31 | LI Sky | 24% | 41% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 32 | BURKHART Camden | 8% | 30% | 39% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
| 33 | FERRING Theo | - | 2% | 11% | 29% | 35% | 19% | 4% |
| 34 | ELSAYED Omar | 2% | 14% | 38% | 34% | 12% | 1% | |
| 35 | DING Orlando | 1% | 6% | 22% | 36% | 27% | 8% | |
| 36 | LOVELL Jackson | 10% | 29% | 34% | 20% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 37 | DAUM William | 4% | 18% | 33% | 30% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 38 | CHUNG Evan | - | 2% | 14% | 37% | 36% | 11% | |
| 38 | NG Jaden | 33% | 48% | 17% | 2% | - | - | |
| 40 | YUNG Nathan | 2% | 15% | 35% | 33% | 13% | 2% | |
| 41 | JECHA Zachary | 11% | 35% | 35% | 15% | 3% | - | |
| 42 | WOO Slade | 4% | 19% | 37% | 30% | 10% | 1% | |
| 43 | WU Aiden | 27% | 48% | 21% | 4% | - | - | |
| 44 | VAN CLEVE Isaac | 5% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 9% | 1% | |
| 45 | RAMOS Pious | 27% | 42% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 46 | CHEN Donovan | 14% | 39% | 33% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 47 | NGUYEN Tristan | 6% | 24% | 35% | 25% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 48 | DING Kyen | 2% | 15% | 33% | 32% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 49 | SUN Alan | 13% | 39% | 35% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 50 | WHITE Marcus | 1% | 7% | 22% | 33% | 26% | 10% | 1% |
| 51 | WANG Chuyun | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 38% | 21% | 4% |
| 52 | RAMAKRISHNA Aditya | 14% | 34% | 33% | 15% | 4% | - | - |
| 53 | LAD Anish | 23% | 42% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 54 | LIU Franklin | 17% | 38% | 31% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 55 | LIU Huberry | - | < 1% | - | 2% | 13% | 41% | 44% |
| 56 | CONCANNON Jackson | 6% | 22% | 34% | 26% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 57 | CHOI Theo | 1% | 9% | 26% | 35% | 22% | 6% | - |
| 57 | SO Cheston | - | 11% | 32% | 35% | 17% | 4% | - |
| 59 | HELM Kevan | - | 7% | 29% | 40% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 60 | BOURCIER Rowan | 19% | 40% | 29% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 61 | LIU Jayden | 12% | 35% | 34% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
| 62 | LI Edward | 15% | 36% | 32% | 14% | 3% | - | |
| 63 | PILYAVSKY Daniel | 17% | 39% | 32% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 64 | ZHU Mason | 31% | 47% | 19% | 3% | - | - | |
| 65 | CHAN Ethan | 5% | 21% | 34% | 27% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 66 | SHETTY Vikram | 32% | 45% | 19% | 3% | - | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.