Ontario Convention Center - Ontario, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | WANG James | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 30% | 5% |
| 2 | LOPEZ Mateo | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 44% | 10% | |
| 3 | LUO Gavin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 42% | 10% |
| 3 | LVOVSKIY Roman | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 65% | 23% | |
| 5 | SU Eric | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 53% | 16% |
| 6 | FU BRANDEN | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 30% |
| 7 | CAO Chong | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 44% | 11% | |
| 8 | WANG Henrik | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 47% | 11% | |
| 9 | FAKHRI Adrian | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 46% | 10% |
| 10 | QI Zach | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 43% | 11% |
| 11 | LEI Isaac | 100% | 99% | 92% | 70% | 37% | 11% | 1% |
| 12 | JI Derek | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 36% | 10% | 1% |
| 13 | LEE Kyle Sung Ju | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 48% | 13% | 1% |
| 14 | DESAI Arthav | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 56% | 17% | |
| 15 | YE Aaron | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 70% | 26% | |
| 16 | ZHANG Hanzhi | 100% | 97% | 81% | 46% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 17 | LEE Jayden | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 82% | 51% | 15% |
| 18 | CHEN Aaron | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 77% | 34% |
| 19 | MOROAICA Seiku | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 25% |
| 20 | ZHENG Matt | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 45% | 12% | |
| 21 | CHOI LIAM | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 64% | 22% | |
| 22 | HSIEH Maxwell | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 47% | 11% |
| 23 | EKAMBARAM Rithik | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 29% | 5% |
| 24 | DENG Aurik | 100% | 96% | 72% | 31% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 25 | WU Allen | 100% | 98% | 85% | 55% | 22% | 4% | - |
| 26 | WONG Alexander | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 72% | 37% | 9% |
| 27 | YOON Jacob | 100% | 89% | 56% | 21% | 4% | - | |
| 28 | RAZAI Evan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 39% | 8% |
| 29 | DENG Richard | 100% | 100% | 98% | 82% | 46% | 11% | |
| 30 | RAMAKRISHNA Arjun | 100% | 99% | 87% | 52% | 16% | 2% | |
| 31 | LI Sky | 100% | 76% | 35% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 32 | BURKHART Camden | 100% | 92% | 62% | 23% | 4% | - | - |
| 33 | FERRING Theo | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 58% | 23% | 4% |
| 34 | ELSAYED Omar | 100% | 98% | 85% | 46% | 13% | 1% | |
| 35 | DING Orlando | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 35% | 8% | |
| 36 | LOVELL Jackson | 100% | 90% | 60% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 37 | DAUM William | 100% | 96% | 78% | 45% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 38 | CHUNG Evan | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 48% | 11% | |
| 38 | NG Jaden | 100% | 67% | 19% | 2% | - | - | |
| 40 | YUNG Nathan | 100% | 98% | 82% | 48% | 15% | 2% | |
| 41 | JECHA Zachary | 100% | 89% | 54% | 19% | 3% | - | |
| 42 | WOO Slade | 100% | 96% | 77% | 41% | 11% | 1% | |
| 43 | WU Aiden | 100% | 73% | 26% | 4% | - | - | |
| 44 | VAN CLEVE Isaac | 100% | 95% | 71% | 35% | 10% | 1% | |
| 45 | RAMOS Pious | 100% | 73% | 31% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 46 | CHEN Donovan | 100% | 86% | 47% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 47 | NGUYEN Tristan | 100% | 94% | 70% | 35% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 48 | DING Kyen | 100% | 98% | 82% | 49% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 49 | SUN Alan | 100% | 87% | 48% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 50 | WHITE Marcus | 100% | 99% | 92% | 70% | 37% | 11% | 1% |
| 51 | WANG Chuyun | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 25% | 4% |
| 52 | RAMAKRISHNA Aditya | 100% | 86% | 52% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
| 53 | LAD Anish | 100% | 77% | 35% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 54 | LIU Franklin | 100% | 83% | 45% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 55 | LIU Huberry | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 44% |
| 56 | CONCANNON Jackson | 100% | 94% | 72% | 38% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 57 | CHOI Theo | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 28% | 6% | - |
| 57 | SO Cheston | 100% | 100% | 88% | 56% | 21% | 4% | - |
| 59 | HELM Kevan | 100% | 100% | 93% | 64% | 24% | 4% | - |
| 60 | BOURCIER Rowan | 100% | 81% | 40% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
| 61 | LIU Jayden | 100% | 88% | 53% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
| 62 | LI Edward | 100% | 85% | 49% | 17% | 3% | - | |
| 63 | PILYAVSKY Daniel | 100% | 83% | 44% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 64 | ZHU Mason | 100% | 69% | 22% | 3% | - | - | |
| 65 | CHAN Ethan | 100% | 95% | 73% | 39% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 66 | SHETTY Vikram | 100% | 68% | 23% | 4% | - | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.