Danvers Indoor Sports - DANVERS, MA, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
# | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
1 | LAI Boden | V V V V V V | V V V V V V | 5.7 | 6 | +0.3 |
2 | TRULL A.J. | V V D V V V | V V V V V D | 5.8 | 5 | -0.8 |
3 | XIA Dashan | V V V V D V | V V V V D | 5.8 | 5 | -0.8 |
3 | NGO-D'ANDRE Nicolas | V V V V V V | V V V V D | 4.2 | 6 | +1.8 |
5 | BOUDREAUX James | D V V V V V | V V V D | 5.7 | 5 | -0.7 |
6 | LIU Adam | V V V V D V | V V V D | 5.6 | 5 | -0.6 |
7 | MEHROTRA Neel | V V V D V V | V V V D | 4.4 | 5 | +0.6 |
8 | CAFASSO Alexander | V V D V | V V V D | 1.8 | 3 | +1.2 |
9 | MA YIXING (Tiger) | V D V V V V | V V D | 4.0 | 5 | +1.0 |
10 | BRADSHAW Carter | V V D V V V | V V D | 4.8 | 5 | +0.2 |
11 | SUH Aiden | D V V V V V | V V D | 3.7 | 5 | +1.3 |
12 | CHALLAMEL Hadrien | V V V D V | V V D | 2.1 | 4 | +1.9 |
13 | SINGLETON Aman | D V V V V | V V D | 4.4 | 4 | -0.4 |
14 | BAJAJ Nakul | D V V V | V V D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
15 | TRAN Spencer | D V V V | V V D | 3.4 | 3 | -0.4 |
16 | ROSIELLO Francesco | D D D V D D | V V V D | 2.7 | 1 | -1.7 |
17 | GLUSHKOV David | V V V V V D | V D | 4.7 | 5 | +0.3 |
18 | LI Ray | D V V V V V | V D | 3.5 | 5 | +1.5 |
19 | MANSFIELD Hunter | D V V V V V | V D | 2.8 | 5 | +2.2 |
20 | LUO Alexander | V D V V V V | V D | 4.1 | 5 | +0.9 |
21 | SPALDING Elihu | V V V V V D | V D | 3.9 | 5 | +1.1 |
22 | KABA Elias | V V D V D V | V D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
23 | WANG-SONG Evan | D D V V V V | V D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
24 | DURKIN Hudson | D V D V V V | V D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
25 | BYRON Max | V V D D V V | V D | 3.3 | 4 | +0.7 |
26 | BHANDARE Veer | V V D V D V | V D | 3.0 | 4 | +1.0 |
27 | OSHIMA Robert | V V D D V V | V D | 3.0 | 4 | +1.0 |
28 | ERIKSEN Casey | V D D V V | V D | 2.6 | 3 | +0.4 |
29 | SZCZAPA Lukas | V D D V D V | V D | 2.3 | 3 | +0.7 |
30 | WANG Eason | D D V D V V | V D | 2.3 | 3 | +0.7 |
31 | MARTISEK Martin | V D D V V D | V D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
32 | PETINO Leonardo | D D V V D D | V D | 3.1 | 2 | -1.1 |
33 | SAVORETTI Pietro | V V V V V V | D | 4.6 | 6 | +1.4 |
34 | CHEN Evan | V V V V D D | D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
35 | PARIGIAN Alexander | V V V D D V | D | 2.9 | 4 | +1.1 |
36 | CARPENTER Touma S. | D V V D V V | D | 3.3 | 4 | +0.7 |
37 | KOPPENHEFFER Rowan | D V V D V V | D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
38 | CUELLAR Markus | V D V V D | D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
39 | PUTHOFF Henry | V V D V D D | D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
40 | CHEN Tianjun | D D V V V D | D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
41 | CHEN Cameron | V D V V D D | D | 1.8 | 3 | +1.2 |
42 | ORESKOVIC Olivier | V D V D V D | D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
43 | MOZZER Nolan | D V V D V D | D | 2.6 | 3 | +0.4 |
44 | ASHLEY Logan | V D D D V V | D | 2.6 | 3 | +0.4 |
45 | ZHAI Junqi | V V D D D D | D | 3.4 | 2 | -1.4 |
46 | BRESLAV Asher | V D D D D V | D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
47 | ROFINO Samuel | D D D V V D | D | 0.9 | 2 | +1.1 |
48 | PAN Anthony | D V D D D V | D | 4.2 | 2 | -2.2 |
49 | ROBINSON Garrett | V V D D D D | D | 2.7 | 2 | -0.7 |
50 | SONG Aidan | D D D D V V | D | 2.6 | 2 | -0.6 |
51 | CHAN Tyler | D V V D D D | D | 1.8 | 2 | +0.2 |
51 | CHAVES Evan | V V D D D D | D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
53 | MECHREFE Anthony | D V D D V D | D | 2.4 | 2 | -0.4 |
54 | THOMAS Ethan | D D V D V D | D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
55 | ZHANG Jonathan | V D D V D D | D | 3.6 | 2 | -1.6 |
56 | ZHENG Jason | V D D D D V | V D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
57 | SONPAL Winslow | D D D V V D | V D | 1.5 | 2 | +0.5 |
58 | GU Eric | D D D V D D | V D | 2.3 | 1 | -1.3 |
59 | ZHU Brady | D D D D D V | V D | 2.0 | 1 | -1.0 |
60 | BENNETT Nathaniel | D D V D D D | V D | 1.8 | 1 | -0.8 |
61 | HANNA Alexander | D V D D D D | V D | 2.1 | 1 | -1.1 |
62 | SMALL Brayden | D D D D D D | V D | 2.3 | 0 | -2.3 |
62 | LIU-XUE Shuliang | D D D D D D | V D | 1.0 | 0 | -1.0 |
64 | LIU George | D D D D D D | V D | 2.1 | 0 | -2.1 |
65 | HAN Nathan | D V D V D D | D | 1.2 | 2 | +0.8 |
66 | MOSHIER Calvin | V D D D | D | 0.9 | 1 | +0.1 |
67 | LEE Ryan | D V D D D | D | 0.5 | 1 | +0.5 |
68 | HOLCOMB Liam | D D D V D D | D | 1.6 | 1 | -0.6 |
69 | RUDIGER George | D D D V D D | D | 0.8 | 1 | +0.2 |
70 | WILLIAMS Gavin | D D V D D D | D | 1.0 | 1 | - |
71 | BEAULIEU Edmund | D D D D V D | D | 1.1 | 1 | -0.1 |
72 | LEE Harrison | D D D D | D | 1.0 | 0 | -1.0 |
73 | KLOTS Theo | D D D D D D | D | 1.2 | 0 | -1.2 |
74 | LIU Easun | D D D D D | D | 2.2 | 0 | -2.2 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
---|---|---|---|
Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.