Danvers Indoor Sports - DANVERS, MA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | LAI Boden | - | - | - | - | 3% | 26% | 70% |
2 | TRULL A.J. | - | - | - | - | 1% | 18% | 81% |
3 | XIA Dashan | - | - | - | - | 1% | 16% | 82% |
3 | NGO-D'ANDRE Nicolas | - | 1% | 5% | 18% | 34% | 31% | 11% |
5 | BOUDREAUX James | - | - | - | - | 2% | 22% | 76% |
6 | LIU Adam | - | - | - | - | 5% | 31% | 64% |
7 | MEHROTRA Neel | - | - | 3% | 14% | 32% | 35% | 15% |
8 | CAFASSO Alexander | 6% | 30% | 46% | 17% | 2% | ||
9 | MA YIXING (Tiger) | - | 1% | 5% | 23% | 42% | 26% | 3% |
10 | BRADSHAW Carter | - | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 41% | 24% |
11 | SUH Aiden | - | 2% | 11% | 29% | 35% | 19% | 4% |
12 | CHALLAMEL Hadrien | 3% | 21% | 45% | 26% | 5% | - | |
13 | SINGLETON Aman | - | - | 1% | 9% | 39% | 51% | |
14 | BAJAJ Nakul | - | 4% | 24% | 51% | 21% | ||
15 | TRAN Spencer | - | 1% | 8% | 40% | 51% | ||
16 | ROSIELLO Francesco | 2% | 12% | 30% | 34% | 19% | 4% | - |
17 | GLUSHKOV David | - | - | 2% | 9% | 28% | 40% | 21% |
18 | LI Ray | - | 3% | 14% | 33% | 35% | 14% | 1% |
19 | MANSFIELD Hunter | 1% | 10% | 28% | 35% | 21% | 5% | - |
20 | LUO Alexander | - | 1% | 5% | 19% | 39% | 32% | 5% |
21 | SPALDING Elihu | - | 2% | 9% | 23% | 34% | 25% | 7% |
22 | KABA Elias | - | 2% | 10% | 26% | 35% | 22% | 5% |
23 | WANG-SONG Evan | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 39% | 21% | 1% |
24 | DURKIN Hudson | - | - | 5% | 21% | 41% | 29% | 4% |
25 | BYRON Max | - | 3% | 17% | 35% | 32% | 12% | 1% |
26 | BHANDARE Veer | 1% | 7% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 6% | - |
27 | OSHIMA Robert | 1% | 8% | 24% | 34% | 24% | 8% | 1% |
28 | ERIKSEN Casey | 1% | 10% | 36% | 38% | 14% | 1% | |
29 | SZCZAPA Lukas | 4% | 19% | 34% | 28% | 12% | 2% | - |
30 | WANG Eason | 3% | 19% | 37% | 29% | 10% | 1% | - |
31 | MARTISEK Martin | 1% | 6% | 20% | 34% | 28% | 10% | 1% |
32 | PETINO Leonardo | 1% | 7% | 22% | 33% | 26% | 9% | 1% |
33 | SAVORETTI Pietro | - | - | 2% | 11% | 29% | 38% | 20% |
34 | CHEN Evan | - | 3% | 15% | 34% | 34% | 14% | 1% |
35 | PARIGIAN Alexander | 1% | 7% | 26% | 38% | 23% | 5% | - |
36 | CARPENTER Touma S. | - | 5% | 19% | 33% | 28% | 12% | 2% |
37 | KOPPENHEFFER Rowan | - | 3% | 14% | 32% | 35% | 16% | 1% |
38 | CUELLAR Markus | - | 3% | 17% | 40% | 33% | 7% | |
39 | PUTHOFF Henry | 2% | 14% | 32% | 32% | 16% | 3% | - |
40 | CHEN Tianjun | - | 4% | 20% | 36% | 30% | 10% | 1% |
41 | CHEN Cameron | 10% | 31% | 35% | 19% | 5% | 1% | - |
42 | ORESKOVIC Olivier | - | 5% | 21% | 35% | 28% | 10% | 1% |
43 | MOZZER Nolan | 2% | 13% | 31% | 33% | 17% | 4% | - |
44 | ASHLEY Logan | 2% | 12% | 30% | 34% | 18% | 4% | - |
45 | ZHAI Junqi | - | 4% | 17% | 32% | 30% | 14% | 2% |
46 | BRESLAV Asher | 6% | 26% | 37% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - |
47 | ROFINO Samuel | 36% | 42% | 18% | 4% | - | - | - |
48 | PAN Anthony | - | 1% | 4% | 18% | 35% | 32% | 10% |
49 | ROBINSON Garrett | 1% | 10% | 30% | 38% | 18% | 3% | - |
50 | SONG Aidan | 3% | 14% | 30% | 31% | 17% | 4% | - |
51 | CHAN Tyler | 11% | 31% | 33% | 18% | 5% | 1% | - |
51 | CHAVES Evan | 7% | 30% | 37% | 20% | 5% | - | - |
53 | MECHREFE Anthony | 3% | 17% | 35% | 31% | 12% | 2% | - |
54 | THOMAS Ethan | 6% | 23% | 34% | 25% | 9% | 2% | - |
55 | ZHANG Jonathan | - | 2% | 11% | 31% | 38% | 17% | 1% |
56 | ZHENG Jason | 2% | 15% | 32% | 31% | 15% | 4% | - |
57 | SONPAL Winslow | 14% | 38% | 34% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
58 | GU Eric | 4% | 20% | 34% | 28% | 12% | 2% | - |
59 | ZHU Brady | 8% | 27% | 35% | 22% | 7% | 1% | - |
60 | BENNETT Nathaniel | 11% | 32% | 34% | 18% | 5% | 1% | - |
61 | HANNA Alexander | 4% | 23% | 39% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - |
62 | SMALL Brayden | 4% | 19% | 36% | 29% | 11% | 1% | - |
62 | LIU-XUE Shuliang | 32% | 41% | 21% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
64 | LIU George | 4% | 24% | 39% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - |
65 | HAN Nathan | 26% | 41% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
66 | MOSHIER Calvin | 32% | 47% | 19% | 2% | - | ||
67 | LEE Ryan | 60% | 33% | 6% | 1% | - | - | |
68 | HOLCOMB Liam | 14% | 35% | 33% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
69 | RUDIGER George | 40% | 41% | 15% | 3% | - | - | - |
70 | WILLIAMS Gavin | 30% | 44% | 22% | 4% | - | - | - |
71 | BEAULIEU Edmund | 26% | 44% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
72 | LEE Harrison | 28% | 48% | 21% | 3% | - | ||
73 | KLOTS Theo | 22% | 43% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
74 | LIU Easun | 2% | 17% | 49% | 27% | 5% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.