The future of US Fencing is at stake!

For transparency, fairness, and athlete support, VOTE NOW for:
(1) Maria Panyi, (2) Andrey Geva, (3) Igor Chirashnya, and (4) Sue Moheb.

Bill Goering Memorial - CO Cup #3 and Vets

Senior Mixed Épée

Sunday, January 27, 2019 at 8:30 AM

Denver Fencing Center - Denver, CO, USA

Probability density of pool victories

Reset

Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.

# Name Number of victories
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
1 BLYTH Jourdain L. - 1% 9% 26% 36% 23% 5%
2 NIEBERGALL Colin G. - - 2% 13% 33% 38% 14%
3 WESTEN Zachary (Zack) C. 2% 13% 32% 34% 17% 3%
3 SHUGART Henry R. - - 1% 5% 22% 42% 30%
5 ALTMAN Jeff H. - 1% 9% 31% 41% 18%
6 REES Daniel I. - - 1% 10% 32% 40% 16%
7 SMITH Jackson - 6% 24% 38% 26% 7%
8 VASHRO Layne - - 1% 6% 25% 43% 26%
9 BUVARP Elisabeth M. - - 3% 16% 36% 34% 10%
10 LE BIHAN Henri 2% 14% 31% 32% 16% 4% -
11 ALAIMO Charles 1% 6% 22% 36% 28% 8%
12 KAJI Ty - 6% 32% 40% 19% 3%
13 ETCHELL Thomas W. 5% 26% 39% 24% 6% -
14 BRANDRETH Garret - 1% 8% 29% 42% 20%
15 KISSINGFORD John F. - 2% 13% 33% 37% 15%
16 BROOKS Tean R. - 6% 25% 37% 24% 7% 1%
17 HOLDERNESS Landon 1% 6% 20% 34% 28% 11% 1%
18 COLE Matthew - 4% 21% 40% 28% 6%
19 WATSON William 2% 14% 35% 35% 13% 1% -
20 MILLER Veronica 2% 12% 29% 33% 19% 5% -
21 WOLF Isabella A. - 5% 18% 33% 30% 12% 2%
22 WEBER Nora 4% 18% 33% 29% 14% 3% -
23 SOLTER Kai 5% 22% 35% 27% 9% 1% -
24 GOLDMAN Rami 2% 13% 29% 33% 18% 4% -
25 NIETZER Jo A. 60% 34% 6% 1% - -
26 KRUGER Mark (Mark Kruger) 4% 23% 37% 26% 8% 1% -
27 MOSKOFF Tessa 1% 11% 31% 35% 18% 4% -
27 WEBER Dick 33% 43% 20% 4% - - -
29 ANDERSON Jennifer 8% 30% 36% 19% 5% 1% -
30 KENT Elizabeth J. 28% 42% 23% 6% 1% - -
31 KENT IV David 2% 13% 30% 32% 17% 4% -
32 FOWLER Henry 14% 56% 26% 4% - -
33 BULK Sierra 42% 41% 15% 2% - -

Explanation

The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:

This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.