Denver Fencing Center - Denver, CO, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | BLYTH Jourdain L. | V V V V V V | V V V V V | 3.9 | 6 | +2.1 |
| 2 | NIEBERGALL Colin G. | V V V V V V | V V V V D | 4.5 | 6 | +1.5 |
| 3 | WESTEN Zachary (Zack) C. | V V D V D | V V V D | 2.6 | 3 | +0.4 |
| 3 | SHUGART Henry R. | V V D V V V | V V V D | 5.0 | 5 | - |
| 5 | ALTMAN Jeff H. | V V V V V | V V D | 3.7 | 5 | +1.3 |
| 6 | REES Daniel I. | D V V V V V | V V D | 4.6 | 5 | +0.4 |
| 7 | SMITH Jackson | V D V V V | V V D | 3.0 | 4 | +1.0 |
| 8 | VASHRO Layne | D V V D V V | V V D | 4.9 | 4 | -0.9 |
| 9 | BUVARP Elisabeth M. | V V V V V V | V D | 4.3 | 6 | +1.7 |
| 10 | LE BIHAN Henri | D D V V V V | V D | 2.6 | 4 | +1.4 |
| 11 | ALAIMO Charles | V D D V V | V D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
| 12 | KAJI Ty | D V D V V | V D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
| 13 | ETCHELL Thomas W. | D V V D V | V D | 2.0 | 3 | +1.0 |
| 14 | BRANDRETH Garret | V V D V D | V D | 3.7 | 3 | -0.7 |
| 15 | KISSINGFORD John F. | D V V D D | V D | 3.5 | 2 | -1.5 |
| 16 | BROOKS Tean R. | V D D D D V | V D | 3.0 | 2 | -1.0 |
| 17 | HOLDERNESS Landon | D V V V V D | D | 3.2 | 4 | +0.8 |
| 18 | COLE Matthew | D D V V V | D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
| 19 | WATSON William | V D D V V D | D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
| 20 | MILLER Veronica | V D D V D V | D | 2.7 | 3 | +0.3 |
| 21 | WOLF Isabella A. | V V D D D V | D | 3.3 | 3 | -0.3 |
| 22 | WEBER Nora | D V D V D D | D | 2.4 | 2 | -0.4 |
| 23 | SOLTER Kai | D D V D D V | D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 |
| 24 | GOLDMAN Rami | V D D D V D | D | 2.7 | 2 | -0.7 |
| 25 | NIETZER Jo A. | V D D D D | D | 0.5 | 1 | +0.5 |
| 26 | KRUGER Mark (Mark Kruger) | V D D D D D | D | 2.1 | 1 | -1.1 |
| 27 | MOSKOFF Tessa | D V D D D D | D | 2.7 | 1 | -1.7 |
| 27 | WEBER Dick | D D V D D D | D | 1.0 | 1 | - |
| 29 | ANDERSON Jennifer | D V D D D D | D | 1.9 | 1 | -0.9 |
| 30 | KENT Elizabeth J. | D D V D D D | D | 1.1 | 1 | -0.1 |
| 31 | KENT IV David | D D V D D D | D | 2.6 | 1 | -1.6 |
| 32 | FOWLER Henry | D D D D D | V D | 1.2 | 0 | -1.2 |
| 33 | BULK Sierra | D D D D D | D | 0.8 | 0 | -0.8 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.