Northwest Fencing Center - Tigard, OR, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | CHANG Lydia | - | - | - | 4% | 24% | 51% | 20% |
| 2 | SOE Hayleigh | - | - | - | - | 4% | 27% | 69% |
| 3 | KENSICKI Phoebe | - | - | - | 1% | 9% | 38% | 51% |
| 3 | PARK Lauren | - | - | - | - | 3% | 24% | 73% |
| 5 | WANG Doreen | - | - | 1% | 5% | 20% | 41% | 34% |
| 6 | DESAI Zoya | - | 1% | 8% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 6% |
| 7 | JIANG Ziqing | - | 1% | 9% | 30% | 42% | 18% | |
| 8 | ZHANG Hannah | - | - | 5% | 22% | 44% | 29% | |
| 9 | CHUNG Katie | 1% | 8% | 23% | 33% | 25% | 8% | 1% |
| 10 | NICOLETTI Thea | 3% | 16% | 31% | 30% | 15% | 4% | - |
| 11 | DONG Nancy | 5% | 26% | 38% | 23% | 6% | 1% | |
| 12 | LI Audrey | - | 2% | 10% | 26% | 35% | 22% | 5% |
| 13 | THOTA Akira | - | - | 2% | 13% | 36% | 39% | 10% |
| 14 | LIN Avery | - | - | 4% | 17% | 36% | 34% | 10% |
| 15 | LIN Clara | - | 6% | 26% | 39% | 23% | 5% | - |
| 16 | AI Mirabelle | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 38% | 23% | 3% |
| 17 | CHENG Audrey | - | - | - | 4% | 19% | 43% | 34% |
| 18 | HO Peyton | - | - | 2% | 10% | 28% | 39% | 22% |
| 19 | KIM Rylie | 1% | 9% | 26% | 36% | 22% | 6% | - |
| 20 | ARUNKISHORE Dakshina | - | 1% | 11% | 34% | 37% | 14% | 1% |
| 21 | CHEN bridgette | - | 1% | 13% | 37% | 35% | 12% | 1% |
| 22 | ESAKI Kei | - | - | - | 2% | 11% | 37% | 50% |
| 23 | LIU Doris-Zihan Zhou | 1% | 9% | 26% | 35% | 23% | 6% | - |
| 24 | CHOI Jian | - | - | - | 2% | 14% | 42% | 42% |
| 25 | LIU Anya | - | 2% | 10% | 26% | 35% | 22% | 5% |
| 26 | KIM Ellen | 4% | 17% | 32% | 30% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 27 | NAKAZATO Olivia | 1% | 10% | 33% | 37% | 16% | 2% | - |
| 28 | ZHU Claire | 1% | 9% | 27% | 36% | 21% | 5% | - |
| 29 | PAN Samantha | 1% | 6% | 21% | 34% | 27% | 10% | 1% |
| 30 | FU Joy | 4% | 19% | 34% | 28% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 31 | LAM Dorris Yandor | 1% | 8% | 25% | 34% | 23% | 7% | 1% |
| 32 | HOLSTAD Anneliese | 1% | 13% | 40% | 33% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 33 | KO Adeline | - | 4% | 18% | 35% | 31% | 11% | 1% |
| 34 | SMIRNOV Victoria | - | 4% | 19% | 38% | 30% | 8% | 1% |
| 35 | WU Gloria | 1% | 5% | 19% | 33% | 29% | 12% | 2% |
| 36 | ZHANG Annabelle | 1% | 11% | 28% | 34% | 20% | 5% | - |
| 37 | KIM Olivia | 4% | 21% | 35% | 28% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 38 | NAKAZATO Isabella | - | 2% | 10% | 28% | 37% | 21% | 4% |
| 39 | ARCE BASURCO Juliana | 7% | 26% | 37% | 23% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 40 | DEJOY Leilah | 3% | 16% | 33% | 31% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 41 | FU Angela | 17% | 38% | 32% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 42 | ZHANG Katie Qingyun | 3% | 20% | 38% | 29% | 9% | 1% | |
| 43 | KIM Ines | 5% | 21% | 33% | 27% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 44 | ZHANG Selene T. | 2% | 13% | 31% | 33% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 45 | CHEN Chloe | 29% | 41% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 45 | TUNG Alison | 4% | 20% | 36% | 28% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 47 | GOWDA Adisha | 3% | 18% | 37% | 31% | 10% | 1% | |
| 48 | PENG Yuewei | 39% | 42% | 16% | 3% | - | - | |
| 49 | CHEN Michelle | 7% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 50 | JOESUF Thea | - | 2% | 10% | 28% | 37% | 21% | 2% |
| 51 | ZHENG Joanna | 4% | 22% | 37% | 27% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 52 | HO Avery | 9% | 40% | 36% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 53 | KHANAL Sarah | 5% | 21% | 34% | 27% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 54 | CHEUNG Carabelle | 27% | 41% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 55 | SUN Zoey | 29% | 49% | 19% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 56 | YOUN Davina | 5% | 23% | 35% | 25% | 9% | 2% | - |
| 57 | TANG Clementine | 23% | 40% | 27% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 58 | JIANG Ziqi | 13% | 35% | 34% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
| 59 | PENG Yuerui | 35% | 42% | 19% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 60 | WU Allison | 1% | 6% | 19% | 33% | 29% | 12% | 1% |
| 61 | SCHULTZ Emmi | 40% | 46% | 12% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 62 | LEE Clara | 59% | 34% | 7% | 1% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.