Air Force Cadet Field House - Air Force Academy, CO, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
1 | MUENKE Magnus | - | - | 3% | 18% | 44% | 34% |
2 | BOUDREAUX James | - | - | - | 1% | 13% | 86% |
3 | HSU Joshua | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 40% | 21% |
3 | GUO Woody | - | 1% | 10% | 33% | 40% | 16% |
5 | LEE Jayden J. | - | - | 2% | 15% | 42% | 41% |
6 | RAHMAN Zayd | 1% | 14% | 36% | 35% | 12% | 1% |
7 | MARENCIK Miles | - | 2% | 12% | 34% | 40% | 12% |
8 | LI Grayson | 1% | 5% | 19% | 35% | 31% | 10% |
9 | GONZALEZ Kian | - | 1% | 7% | 28% | 44% | 20% |
10 | SCHMIDT Leonard | - | 1% | 11% | 32% | 39% | 17% |
11 | DILEEP Roshan | 1% | 7% | 28% | 42% | 21% | 1% |
12 | DENG Destin | 13% | 35% | 34% | 15% | 3% | - |
13 | TIEKING Noah | 1% | 10% | 33% | 37% | 17% | 3% |
14 | SUN Neo | 1% | 13% | 36% | 37% | 13% | - |
15 | EMERSON Zachary | 3% | 18% | 34% | 31% | 13% | 2% |
16 | DAVIDSON James | 13% | 38% | 34% | 12% | 2% | - |
17 | SCHWITZER Eliot | 2% | 13% | 34% | 36% | 14% | 2% |
18 | KIM Remington | - | 3% | 18% | 39% | 32% | 9% |
19 | PARADKAR Akshay | 27% | 48% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
20 | RAHMAN Ali | 4% | 22% | 36% | 27% | 9% | 1% |
21 | COSGROVE Franklin | 2% | 16% | 38% | 33% | 11% | 1% |
22 | HONG Daniel | 1% | 8% | 30% | 41% | 19% | 1% |
23 | HOLLOWAY IMRIE Colin | 42% | 43% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
24 | MARTEGANI Enea | 5% | 29% | 40% | 21% | 4% | - |
25 | SCHNEIDER Ronan | 16% | 43% | 32% | 9% | 1% | - |
26 | YAO Tristan | 5% | 23% | 40% | 26% | 6% | - |
27 | MESSENGER Niko | 4% | 30% | 40% | 21% | 4% | - |
28 | DEAN Samuel | 30% | 43% | 22% | 5% | - | - |
29 | DEAN Isaac | 57% | 35% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
30 | ADAMS Simeon | 36% | 45% | 16% | 2% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.